import 4.code.options;
import 4.code.about;

class Header{

public void title(){

String fullTitle = "/n/ - Transportation";

public void menu();

public void board();

public void goToBottom();

public void refresh(a);

class Thread extends Board{
public void EmptyTitle(OP Anonymous){

String fullTitle = "EmptyTitle";
int postNumber = "1212407";
String image = "1502230027477.jpg";
String date = "07/11/18(Wed)18:54:31";
String comment = "Final say on these?";

public void comments(){
if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212408 && dateTime=="07/11/18(Wed)18:56:41")

it's black"

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212411 && dateTime=="07/11/18(Wed)19:08:51" && image=="I LOVE HELMETS.jpg")


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212436 && dateTime=="07/11/18(Wed)19:55:29")

Specialized makes ugly helmets. I prefer Giro"

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212455 && dateTime=="07/11/18(Wed)20:46:01" && image=="d04.jpg")

"Hemut save life";

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212550 && dateTime=="07/12/18(Thu)05:09:28")

I see no reason not to wear one when cycling and you an use the straps to mount these sound dampening catears on them to reduce wind-noise."

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212632 && dateTime=="07/12/18(Thu)10:30:33")

"I wear the Specialized Max (made for big heads) and love it. Came with a dorky front part that is easily removed because it isn't 2003 anymore.

as for these "low profile" race helmets I would caution against them. Once you are going through the hassle of buying and wearing a helmet you might as well get one that provides the most protection as possible.

I fear that falling in a low profile helmet would result in a catastrophic fracture of your jaw or cheekbone which would be deflected with a fatter, eggier shaped helmet that protrudes farther out from the side of your head."

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212633 && dateTime=="07/12/18(Thu)10:33:57")

"Its better than nothing, just dont buy some expensive as fuck memebrand";

if(nikolasv !!gwLtMyM6EoH && title=="" && postNumber==1212637 && dateTime=="07/12/18(Thu)10:45:35")

I went to a manufacturer bike demo and they require you to have helmets, so it is one of the few rides I took with a helmet. The owner's son of 3 bike stores in the county was there and saw my helmet on the table and told me that I should throw it out because it is too old and not safe. He said after 2 years the Styrofoam should be replaced. Really that helmet is from 2010 and I am not getting a new one, I only use a helmet for bike demos like that one. He then gave some spiel about a nasty crash where he broke his collarbone and his helmet cracked into over 6 pieces and says he would died without one.

I wanted to tell him:
You know what is not safe -- promoting road racing and mtb racing culture which is the Fred koolaid bike stores like him do. A bunch of barely skilled people in a peloton is what will really fuck you up. A bunch of barely skilled people trying to pass each other on narrow trails where they have to make abrupt line choices on their mtb because someone else is there is also a good way to get injured. But I didn't say it because I don't want to break rapport with the LBS.

I still never had a serious fall that broke bones or forced me to me miss work. Yet avid Freds seem to get fucked up on the regular, I wonder why?

If you want to be safe, stop participating in Fred culture. I figure at that bike demo I must have been the youngest guy there other than some of the bike store employees and I am 36... Also there ware alot of overweight mtb Freds trying to cram their bodies into lycra it was an ugly sight. "Herr derr -- even though I am overweight and never gonna be at a bodyweight to get good at cycling --- I still need to wear lycra even at a mtb demo because the industry has me mesmerized with getting any type of aero advantage..." No wonder when people like that represent cycling, why cycling cannot grow..."

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212641 && dateTime=="07/12/18(Thu)10:48:55")

nice blog faggot"

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212682 && dateTime=="07/12/18(Thu)12:46:21")

daily reminder to kys yourself, nikofag"

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212684 && dateTime=="07/12/18(Thu)12:50:23" && image=="tripcodes.png")

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1212686 && dateTime=="07/12/18(Thu)12:56:20")

this reads like a terry davis usenet post"

if(nikolasv !!gwLtMyM6EoH && title=="" && postNumber==1213168 && dateTime=="07/13/18(Fri)15:43:29" && image=="nerdliving.on.toilet.png")


Worthless manlets, incapable of intelligent discussions. That is why you "anonymous coward". Slashdot got it right back in the mid nineties about what kind of people don't want to stand by what they write.

See the pic for what you would look like if you could gain weight."

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1213169 && dateTime=="07/13/18(Fri)15:49:50")

"Not wearing one is basically a "I don't go fast"";

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1213171 && dateTime=="07/13/18(Fri)15:50:22")

nice blog faggot"

if(nikolasv !!gwLtMyM6EoH && title=="" && postNumber==1213178 && dateTime=="07/13/18(Fri)16:03:27")

Not wearing one means one is educated on how ineffective they are and how biased the past studies touting their alleged benefit were:

The most cited study for their benefit was comparing American minority children riding on the roads who got struck by cars and their trips to the hospital and comparing them to obedient middle class white kids riding with helmets, supervised in parks or other car-free areas and their falls and their pussy white parents taking them to hospitals for scrapes... Then that study attributed the greater injuries of the people hit by cars to non-helmet use and the lesser injury of the pussy white kids simply falling without striking a car, to their wearing a helmet... Give us a break.

Nice cowardice anonfag idiot.


>In this study, a comparison was made between 145 children treated in hospitals in Seattle for a head injury (the 'cases'), and a 'community control' group of 480 children who had, in one way or another, simply fallen from their bikes. A comparison of the two groups based mainly on helmet use of children under 15 years (21.1% of ‘control’ vs 2.1% of ‘case’ children) leads to the frequently quoted claim that the reduction in head injury due to helmets is 85%.


>As well as having a helmet wearing rate 7 times that of the cyclists riding round Seattle, the ‘community control’ group came from higher income households and had parents with higher educational levels. The observational survey of child cyclists riding in Seattle found that helmet wearers were predominantly white, middle class, riding with their parents in parks, whereas the non-wearers were more often black or other races riding alone on busy city streets. The risk profile of these two groups would be quite different.

Anyway no one expects anything progressive from you Anglosphere whites, so please fuck off of the face of the earth..."

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1213181 && dateTime=="07/13/18(Fri)16:05:39")

nice blog faggot"

if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==1213198 && dateTime=="07/13/18(Fri)16:24:01" && image=="helmet stickers.jpg")

Great place to show off my sticker collection"