import 4.code.options;
import 4.code.about;

class Header{

public void title(){

String fullTitle = "// - ";
}

public void menu();

public void board();

public void goToBottom();

public void refresh(a);

}
class Thread extends Board{
public void Facebookremoves559pagesaheadofU.S.midterms;using'coordinatedinauthenticbehavior(OP Anonymous){

String fullTitle = "Facebook removes 559 pages ahead of U.S. midterms; using 'coordinated inauthentic behavior";
int postNumber = "299727";
String image = "";
String date = "10/11/18(Thu)15:56:43";
String comment = "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/11/facebook-removes-559-inauthentic-pages-ahead-of-us-midterms.html

Facebook on Thursday announced the removal of 559 Pages and 251 accounts that it says broke the company's rules against spam and "coordinated inauthentic behavior."

The company said it chose to disclose the removal of these accounts and pages due to the "timing ahead of the U.S. midterm elections."

Facebook said many of the Pages in question were using fake accounts to share links across groups on Facebook. Those accounts would hit the Like button on those links, artificially inflating engagement, the company said in a blog post.

"They post clickbait posts on these Pages to drive people to websites that are entirely separate from Facebook and seem legitimate, but are actually ad farms," the company said. "This activity goes against what people expect on Facebook, and it violates our policies against spam."
..."
;

}
public void comments(){
if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299730 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)16:22:45")

"In other words, they deleted anything pro conservative.";


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299735 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)16:38:30")

">>299730
According to the half of the article that wasnt posted, the deleted content was because the posters were artificially inflating the likes on the posts via bot farm. They make a point not to mention what exactly the content was or where it was from or even if it was Fake News™"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299744 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)16:56:22")

">>299730
More like they deleted bot accounts and SHOCK, all the bots are shilling for conservatives.
It's not the first time it's been exposed a lot of the followers for the right wing are just Russian bots.
https://metro.co.uk/2018/02/21/twitter-just-purged-russian-bots-trump-fans-crying-followers-vanish-7329362/"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299792 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)18:53:03")

">>299744
Shareblue begone"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299794 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)19:06:35")

">>299792
>When cornered by the facts with no chance escape or rebuttable, the /pol/ppet cries 'shareblue'"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299795 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)19:08:30")

">>299794
you guys shill this board nonstop, i can identify three or four of you by posting style alone"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299800 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)19:18:38")

">>299795
Most of it is one person working overtime."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299801 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)19:20:03")

">>299795
Compared to the endless stream of /pol/shills three or four sounds about even."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299804 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)19:21:59")

">>299795
>Deletes your Russian bot army from facebook"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299805 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)19:27:34")

">>299727
>all the "bots" failbook finds just happen to be espousing right-wing politics
A mere coincidence goyim, we all know the left doesn't employ shills after all!"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299807 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)19:36:15")

">>299805
Citation needed you cocksucking faggot"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299811 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)19:49:10")

">>299805
Only the right wing is conspiring with the Russians.
When your group commits a certain type of crime, don't be shocked when only your group is the one prosecuted for it."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299854 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)21:47:07")

">>299744
>More like they deleted bot accounts and SHOCK, all the bots are shilling for conservatives
no, its just what you hear on the sounbites on CNN, lets look at some numbers for an actual, large scale bot purge:
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/twitter-purge-begins-trump-obama-perry-lose-hundreds-thousands-followers-n891081
Katy Perry, the most followed person on Twitter, lost 2.8 million followers, bringing her follower count down to a mere 106.8 million. President Barack Obama lost around 2.3 million, bringing his following to 101.3 million. And President Donald Trump shed more than 300,000 followers, bringing his total to 53.1 million as of Thursday evening."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299856 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)21:49:05")

">>299854
in other words due to the Twitter bot purge:
Katy Perry lost 2.5% of followers
Obama lost 2.2% of followers
Trump lost 0.5% of followers

The numbers really lean heavy on democrats using bots in larger numbers, you just dont hear it reported on as widely"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299859 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)21:50:56")

">>299744
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/12/technology/twitter-followers-nyt.html
if you read this article, the number of followers lost for obama vs trump is a little different...
it claims trump lost 340k followers, which would be 0.6%, while Obama lost 3 million, which puts him at losing 3% overall followers"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299860 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)21:51:54")

">>299856
So why is it conservatives that are mad whenever there's bot purging?"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299861 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)21:53:39")

">>299856
I don't think bot purges isn't what the OP article is talking about. It seems like actual people are behind the fakes, maybe something similar to a bangladeshi click farm."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299863 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)21:57:43")

">>299861
Still an absolutely nightmarish image. Little kids, in poorly ventilated sweatshops, clicking away at shit they can't even read all day...for pennies. PENNIES.

I totally do think there are bots out there I just think the idea of click farming in a sweatshop is hilarious"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299864 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)22:02:10")

">>299860
Because once again, it's what is most widely reported on"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299869 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)22:08:08")

">>299811
Hello CNN shill."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299871 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)22:10:02")

">>299859
>>299856
Yet you don't see Obama, Kerry or liberals crying about it since it's only for Republicans where bots are a key part of their propaganda campaign against the American people. Which is why it's always the right wing who cries like little bitches about censorship when they lose their bot following."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299872 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)22:10:28")

">>299863
It might be funny to you but they are a real thing and can make up whatever fake grassroots support is needed for the highest bidder. This is exactly what the OP article is talking about.

https://www.businessinsider.com/silicon-valley-are-click-farms-real-2016-6

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/bizarre-click-farm-10000-phones-10419403"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299874 && dateTime=="10/11/18(Thu)22:11:53")

">>299873
Very ironic post for this thread."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299908 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)00:01:38")

">>299872
Oh, I don't need convincing. I read an article about unnatural engagement rates back when #walkaway got botted, got curious, and looked at the tweets myself.

I got the picture after the tenth post with 10 followers and 400 replies."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299920 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)00:39:42")

">>299872
It's funny, but it always seems to be the right wing that pays to create those astroturf campaign.
See >>299908 and the #walkaway bot campaign by Russian and the right wing."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299922 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)00:52:09")

">>299920
>it always seems to be the right wing that pays to create those astroturf campaign.
>Obama literally had 10 times the number of followers on Twitter which turned out to be Bots than Trump did
>Obama, like Trump ran his entire campaign from social media
>I conveniently ignore this and choose to blame it all on Republicans
Your willfully ignorant if you think only one team is playing ball in this game"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299924 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)00:54:01")

">>299922
Sources on all of those ridiculous fucking claims?"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299976 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)05:48:00")

">>299744
>More like they deleted bot accounts and SHOCK, all the bots are shilling for conservatives.

How do we know they were "bots" if the pages/accounts are deleted?"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299977 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)05:49:48")

">The USA Really News Agency is offering everybody whose accounts have been blocked to file a collective lawsuit due to the violations of American laws and brutal censorship.
>Moreover, we are offering a reward of up to $5,000 for any information on peremptorily illegal actions from the side of the U.S. Government and the structures controlled by them that impose censorship in the field of social networks in particular, and the Internet in general

https://usareally.com/page/zuckerberg"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299996 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)08:18:47")

">>299924
>Sources on all of those ridiculous fucking claims?
how about you get fucked anon, or try reading the thread, your choice
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/12/technology/twitter-followers-nyt.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/twitter-purge-begins-trump-obama-perry-lose-hundreds-thousands-followers-n891081
Both teams play ball in the same game, and you only hear major outrage over republicans doing it
you are a fucking willfully blind idiot"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==299999 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)08:21:26")

">>299996
You proved you didn't read the articles at all. Obama's extra followers were dummys but not bots."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300000 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)08:23:47")

">>299999
You clearly did not read the articles.

the word dummy is not mentioned in either of them, both articles are talking about bots

I would be interested to hear your retarded differentiation between a bot and a dummy, regardless"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300001 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)08:24:49")

">>299999
>The company is taking the action to restore trust in its platform. Many users have inflated their followings with automated or fake accounts, buying the appearance of social influence to bolster their political activism, business endeavors or entertainment careers
>President Trump, who has used Twitter as a way to speak directly to both loyal voters and critics, lost about 340,000 followers in the Twitter purge, knocked down to 53 million from 53.4 millon on Wednesday. His predecessor, President Barack Obama, took a much bigger hit, losing three million followers in about one day. (He started with many more, dropping to 101 million on Thursday from 104 million the day before.)"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300002 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)08:26:53")

">>299999
your stupid if you think that these accounts in question simply like or follow someone and dont do anything at all.
they are autmated accounts, set up so talk, and like, and chat with each other making it look like legitimate activity."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300005 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)08:37:15")

">>300000
>>300001
>>300002
Obama bought them back in 2012. (So did Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich). The accounts were dummies made by bots but not bots themselves.
>Twitter followers are sold in two ways: “Targeted” followers, as they are known in the industry, are harvested using software that seeks out Twitter users with similar interests and follows them, betting that many will return the favor. “Generated” followers are from Twitter accounts that are either inactive or created by spamming computers — often referred to as “bots.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/fashion/twitter-followers-for-sale.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1345810035-hPtdwhoE1D2MaX4UUGwl9g"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300012 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)08:54:54")

">>300005
>This sort of picking hairs
Everybody's bot acountswere purchased at some point
None of these politicians made them themselves
Or are you suggesting the accounts were created, smashed the like button and follow buttons and then never used again?
Because I've actually bought some bot following from blackhatworld back in 2012 or 2013 and even the inexpensive ones would still talk to each other and chatter and post images"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300015 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)08:57:04")

">>300012
The aren't bots if all they do is sit there after being created, which is what Obama's fake"Followers" were doing."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300017 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)09:02:05")

">>300005
>It's ok when my political party does it, but it's different when your political party does it
Are American politics really this stupid?
Don't answer, they are"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300019 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)09:04:23")

">>300005
Why would anyone accept a citation on a technical/technology related subject from the fashion section of any publication"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300020 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)09:05:59")

">>300017
It's like you're conflating the difference between a spambot and a dummy account.

>>300019
>it's a shoot the messenger argument
I guess fashionistas use fake twitter accounts even more than Obama does."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300024 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)09:15:47")

">>300022
Go away /pol/ nobody asked you"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300025 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)09:17:32")

">>300020
Yes, I shot the messenger in my argument
There is a reason that hair dressers can't testify in court about the results of dna testing, and it is because they know nothing about it and are not a subject expert, thus anything they say on the subject holds little weight.
I shot the messenger for the same line of reasoning and in fact did not read your article.
If you provide one that isn't a opinion and is from either a science, technology, political or uncategorized section of a major publication suupporting your argument I will read it"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300027 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)09:22:08")

">>300025
It isn't opinion, in fact it doesn't even have anything to do with fashion in the slightest, but have fun getting triggered over a URL."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300030 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)09:26:22")

">>299730
Yep, but if your using that commie garbage to begin with your almost beyond hope anyway"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300031 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)09:27:57")

">>300030
What's commie garbage about one of the largest corporations in the world?"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300032 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)09:30:57")

">>300031
if it doesn't suck trumps cock then it's unamerican"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300043 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)10:16:32")

">>300005
I'm sorry but your article does not support your claim. It uses the term fake account but just not actually say what you are claiming.
In fact it describes exactly what anon described here >>300012
And I tend to agree with that. People do not pay money for accounts that don't do anything except just hit a like button once and then go dormant.
these body counts generate traffic and talk to each other so that it's not obvious they are fake.
Your article did not actually support anything you said, you are ascribing your own meaning to words and putting your own meaning behind what was actually written in order to support your Viewpoint when the article did not actually say anything like that"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300045 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)10:20:41")

">>300043
What kind of /pol/sperg do you have to be to take a lighthearted article about celebrities including Obama padding out their social media accounts with extra followers as a marketing ploy to find the doom and gloom angle about shillbots.
>Your article did not actually support anything you said,
>the article did not actually say anything like that
Yes it fucking did, or what the fuck else do you think
>Will Mitchell, the founder of Clear Presence Media, a marketing company outside Tampa, Fla., said that he has bought more than a million followers for his clients, which include musicians, start-ups and a well-known actress he declined to identify.
means?
Do you really think those fake accounts are being used to shill?"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300046 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)10:23:53")

">>300045
I'm telling you how this business operates as somebody who has had experience in it.
These accounts do not hit a like button and then go dormant forever. People who buy bots do not want it totally obvious that they've are buying bot accounts and your article does not say anything to support your claim that they hit a like button and then go dormant.
Feel free to quote the part of the article that proves I'm wrong"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300047 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)10:24:46")

">>300045
>Do you really think those fake accounts are being used to shill?
Yes they absolutely are. They're used to retweet the customers tweets and to post their own tweets on what the customer is talking about"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300049 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)10:25:45")

">>300045
>Company that earns a business selling bot accounts
>Millions of accounts used for famous actors and pop stars
>But these accounts are not used to shill
Do you even read what you post"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300050 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)10:31:51")

">>300046
>>300047
>>300049
I give up trying to educate you people. It's hopeless. Obama's "bot" twitter followers were dormant and didn't even have the capability to do more in 2012. You people claim to be in the industry yet don't seem to have any idea how marketing works.

These are not shills, they are dormant placeholders to pad out the followers of celebrities and nothing more.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johngreathouse/2012/08/27/celebrities-with-the-most-allegedly-fake-twitter-followers/#735ef942ae3b"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300058 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)10:49:32")

">>299730
>Conservative ideas are so bad that they have to set up bots to spam Facebook to make it look like they have popular support
Spinning is fun, just don't get too dizzy there."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300072 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)11:28:33")

">>300050
>I give up trying to educate you people. It's hopeless. Obama's "bot" twitter followers were dormant
when it really comes down to it you have provided absolutely no evidence to back up your claim and it seems to be motivated by your political bias, i.e. its bot activity when one side of the political spectrum does it, but it is different when the other side does it"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300073 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)11:31:33")

">>300072
the other side isn't "doing it" at all"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300079 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)11:44:31")

">>300073
:/ Once again you either haven't read it are ignoring what was posted earlier in the thread in favor of your own political bias"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300081 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)11:50:35")

">>300079
At very least you're talking about asymmetric warfare. Your position is analogous to the faggots who say FoxNews and MSNBC are exactly the same when they obviously are very different in their levels of journalism."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300084 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)12:01:24")

">>300050
Even if that's true, padded follower numbers is clearly nowhere near on the same level as the botting we get nowadays.

Computer generated comments, upvotes by the thousands, engagement rates of up to four THOUSAND percent. Comparing that to empty, inactive accounts used solely to pad follower numbers is like comparing dynamite to a nuke."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300096 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)13:00:48")

">>300084
>Comparing that to empty, inactive accounts used solely to pad follower numbers
and there has been no evidence presented of this. I have never heard of shit-tier accounts like this.
Back in 2012 I was paying $50 for 1000 followers and they did not just hit a like button and stay otherwise inactive. they would chat and engage other users who engaged with them.
And im damn sure any political candidate running for US presidency would have a better source of higher quality bot accounts than blackhatworld"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300097 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)13:02:28")

">>300058
kek"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300104 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)13:27:27")

"Fuck Facebook/Instagram&Twitter all Commie Bastards FREEDOM WILL NOT BE SILENT!!!";


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300109 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)13:33:32")

">>299871
You realize the reason why Trump only lost such little followers for being "bots" is because he has already had his bot share purged multiple times? He's been accused of treason involving the Russians multiple times my dude"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300154 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)16:59:12")

">>299922
Yet you don't see Obama, Kerry or liberals crying about it since it's only for Republicans where bots are a key part of their propaganda campaign against the American people. Which is why it's always the right wing who cries like little bitches about censorship when they lose their bot following."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300156 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)17:03:15")

">>299976
STOP USING LOGIC YOU'RE RAPING ME
I read an article that Trump has a pee pee tape that's why he hired Russian bots it must be true!"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300157 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)17:04:07")

">>300096
So then what is this
>>300050
>Obama's "bot" twitter followers were dormant and didn't even have the capability to do more in 2012.
Which is it?"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300166 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)17:41:36")

">>299976
Because they wouldn't be deleted unless they were bots, which requires specific flags to marked.
Checkmate Ivan."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300171 && dateTime=="10/12/18(Fri)17:50:35")

">>299795
>three or four
Yeah well it sounds like Facebook just identified 559 of you"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300506 && dateTime=="10/13/18(Sat)20:51:40")

">>299744
Do you really use this shithole as a news resource or was it just for reference?"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300592 && dateTime=="10/14/18(Sun)10:47:26")

">>300166
>Because they wouldn't be deleted unless they were bots, which requires specific flags to marked.
Specific flags including, I'm sure:
Criticizing any part of the MSM for dishonest reporting
Posting anything right of center
Memes making fun of leftists and their inability to meme"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300604 && dateTime=="10/14/18(Sun)11:32:09")

">>300171
Underrated"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300712 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)01:01:46")

">>299727
>"inauthentic behaviour"
wth does that mean exactly???"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300767 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)04:42:15")

">>299730
In other words, being pro-conservative is indistinguishable from being a Russian bot.

But, no, the conservatives are the ones with the redpill. Right? Repeat after me. I. AM. FREE."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300797 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)09:22:13")

">>300592
Imagine being this far right wing"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300864 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)14:00:28")

">>300797
> Imagine being this far right wing
I don't have to imagine. All I need to do is tune in Faux News. Or basically any radio talk show, apart from NPR."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300866 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)14:14:10")

">>300767
>Repeat after me. I. AM. FREE.
The most descriptive line for a right-winger I've ever heard."
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300873 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)14:51:18")

">>300797
>Imagine being this far right wing
I.E, again, anything left of center is "this far right wing"

>>300864
Imagine being so far left wing you think the MSM, outside of NPR, are all right wing"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300876 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)15:00:45")

">>300866
>>300864
>>300797
AND THE SHILLING BEGINS WITH THE WORK WEEK
>>300656
>>300656
>>300656"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300889 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)15:20:04")

">>300876
>cross-linking a thread about something much less controversial

What's your point, cuck?"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300902 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)15:45:36")

">>300889
The point is this board is a lot better on the weekends whenfaggots like you aren't here.
Real funny how it's actually somewhat civil on this board until the weekdays when suddenly all these posters appear pushing a political agenda
Fuck off ass spelunker"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300903 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)15:47:43")

">>300889
>cuck
Sound the/pol/arm!!
/Pol/ppet detected!"
;


if(Anonymous && title=="" && postNumber==300910 && dateTime=="10/15/18(Mon)15:58:03")

">>300889
>cuck
whooop!
go back to /pol/land, we dont like /pol/ygamists around here, we'll make your head spin so quick you thought it was /pol/ harbor, you /pol/theist.
Do not pass go, do not collect $200, ive got a mono/pol/ly on boardwalk, and you just landed on a /pol/tel.
Quick, doctor! I need a /pol/iotomy, I think its /pol/ignant cancer!
when life gives you /pol/s, make ap/pol/ pie"
;


}
}