import 4.code.about;

class Header {

public void title() {

String fullTitle = '/an/';
}

public void menu();

public void board();

public void goToBottom();

}
class Thread extends Board {
public void undefined(OP Anonymous) {

String fullTitle = 'undefined';
int postNumber = 4781990;
String image = '1714088526808543.jpg';
String date = '04/25/24(Thu)19:42:06';
String comment = 'Science LIED to me';

}
public void comments() {
if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4781996 && dateTime=='04/25/24(Thu)19:44:33') {

'>>4781990
What THE FUCK is that?????'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782027 && dateTime=='04/25/24(Thu)20:11:16') {

'>>4781990
show me the SCIENCE that says T. rex was covered in feathers

you can't
because SCIENCE never said that'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782037 && dateTime=='04/25/24(Thu)20:25:32') {

'>>4781996
MEGA ULTRA CHICKEN'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782199 && dateTime=='04/26/24(Fri)01:30:08') {

'>>4781990
What's with the human, though?'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782295 && dateTime=='04/26/24(Fri)06:57:43'  && image=='Early_feathers.jpg') {

'>>4782027
Kinda this, the current scientific consensus is that it didn't have feathers, and if it did, they were sparse and thin like an elephant.
Also eternal reminder, when people mention "feathers" on a dinosaur, they aren't usually talking about giant eagle flight feathers, but little fucked up hair filaments that in some cases would be nearly indistinguishable from fur or fuzz.'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782297 && dateTime=='04/26/24(Fri)06:59:10') {

'>>4782037
Noo... he is legend'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782362 && dateTime=='04/26/24(Fri)09:15:25') {

'>>4782199
its natural predator'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782395 && dateTime=='04/26/24(Fri)10:01:51') {

'>>4781990
90% of the time when you think scientists lied to you, it was actually reporters, advertisers, and politicians misrepresenting scientific research or discussion on purpose. They'll take a small squabble between two groups of scientists over something without enough evidence to conclude on, pick a side, and loudly declare it's a fact when almost nobody in the scientific community would back such a claim.'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782397 && dateTime=='04/26/24(Fri)10:08:07') {

'>>4782395
>almost nobody
And you can be sure they will find that "almost nobody" and get him to shill whatever point they want'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782477 && dateTime=='04/26/24(Fri)12:26:34'  && image=='BWC.webm') {

'>>4781996
>Your father!'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782483 && dateTime=='04/26/24(Fri)12:31:47') {

'>>4782395
True to an extent, but we have a fair number of instances of scientists lying and outright misrepresenting their findings for the purpose of an agenda, this is why its useful to learn how to digest the data yourself rather than relying on a mouthpiece to explain it but of course most people simply don’t have care or have the time for it so they fall back on the ‘scientists’ and tabloids and shit.'
;

}

if(Anonymous && title=='undefined' && postNumber==4782484 && dateTime=='04/26/24(Fri)12:32:53') {

'>>4782477
>BWC has arrived'
;

}

}
}