'>>1291396
The effort to sue took on new importance with the revelations that the bribery allegations cited on air originated from the FBI informant Alexander Smirnov, who was indicted by special counsel David Weiss in February.


In a statement, Geragos said: “For the last five years, Fox News has relentlessly attacked Hunter Biden and made him a caricature in order to boost ratings and for its financial gain. The recent indictment of FBI informant Smirnov has exposed the conspiracy of disinformation that has been fueled by Fox, enabled by their paid agents and monetized by the Fox enterprise. We plan on holding them accountable.”

Hunter Biden has been a focus of Fox News coverage for the last several years. A review of network transcripts by the group Media Matters cites at least 13,440 mentions of Hunter Biden since January 2023. Biden’s legal team believes the number of mentions over many years makes the potential case as significant if not more so than the Dominion case, according to sources familiar with the legal strategy.

The Biden letter specifically cites Fox’s advancement of bribery allegations by Smirnov, who was indicted in February on charges of making false statements about the Bidens to the FBI. “Smirnov and the post indictment revelations basically closed the loop on the conspiracy,” Geragos told NBC News.

The letter alleges that Fox News knew that the bribery allegations were unverified at the time but continued to report that the source was “highly credible,” and demands corrections and retractions — including on-air statements by television hosts “including Sean Hannity, Jesse Watters, and Maria Bartiromo, to inform their viewers on air that they have been sharing a debunked allegation from a source who has been federally indicted.”';

'>>1291397
The letter also alleges that Fox’s airing of “intimate images” belonging to Hunter Biden that his lawyers claim were “hacked, stolen, and/or manipulated” violates Biden’s civil rights as well as copyright law. Much of the letter is focused on a six-part “mock trial” titled “The Trial of Hunter Biden” that aired in October 2021, described by Fox as what a trial might look like if Biden was charged with Foreign Agents Registration Act or bribery charges — neither of which Biden has been charged with. “While using certain true information, the series intentionally manipulates the facts, distorts the truth, narrates happenings out of context, and invents dialogue intended to entertain. Thus, the viewer of the series cannot decipher what is fact and what is fiction,” the letter says. The letter demands that the series be removed from all streaming services.';

'huh, i was told that the laptop wasn't real and it was all conspiracies though?';

'>>1291399
The dick pics were real obviously, and republitards couldn't stop slobering over them';

'>>1291400
>republitards couldn't stop slobering over th
MTG had her vagina juices on the pix of Hunter that she showed in congress.
Hunter should look into suing her.';

'>>1291400
How about the underage hookers he was fuckin?';

'>>1291396
>take a bunch of photos of yourself committing crimes including smoking crack and having an illegal firearm
>post photos to the internet
>get mad when the news covers it
do bidens really?';

'>>1291405
It's good to be the king.';

'>>1291404
>How about the underage hookers he was fuckin?
There's no evidence any of them were underage, but if you recognize the hookers and know their ages, maybe tell the FBI that. I'm sure they'll be curious where you got that info.

>>1291405
Pretty sure this lawsuit is about the whole accusing him of being involved in an international conspiracy to corrupt the US government thing and then refusing to retract the story when it turned out all their sources were full of shit, not about the cool crimes.';

'>>1291407
>Pretty sure this lawsuit is about the whole accusing him of being involved in an international conspiracy to corrupt the US government thing and then refusing to retract the story when it turned out all their sources were full of shit, not about the cool crimes.
See:
>The letter also alleges that Fox’s airing of “intimate images” belonging to Hunter Biden... violates Biden’s civil rights as well as copyright law';

'>>1291409
Revenge porn is illegal';

'>>1291409
>copyright law
I'm confused on how copyright law applies to something that I'm sure is not copyrighted.';

'>>1291412
and copyright of something that intelligence officials insist never existed in the first place. truly awe inspiring stuff here';

'>>1291413
You shouldn't lie while accusing others of lying';

'>>1291413
Even if it was copyrighted (which I'm sure it isn't?) then surely fair use would apply.
>Under the fair use doctrine of the U.S. copyright statute, it is permissible to use limited portions of a work including quotes, for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports.
I understand lawyers can make all sorts of pathetic arguments that won't hold up in court, but this seems like a pretty easy slam dunk.';

'>>1291414
where's the lie?';

'>“For the last five years, Fox News has relentlessly attacked Hunter Biden and made him a caricature in order to boost ratings and for its financial gain,”
Isn't that *literally* what every news network has done with trump?

I don't see this going anywhere';

'>>1291412
>I'm confused on how copyright law applies to something that I'm sure is not copyrighted.
You're confusing copyright and registered copyright.
>In all countries where the Berne Convention standards apply, copyright is automatic, and need not be obtained through official registration with any government office. Once an idea has been reduced to tangible form, for example by securing it in a fixed medium (such as a drawing, sheet music, photograph, a videotape, or a computer file), the copyright holder is entitled to enforce their exclusive rights.';

'>>1291418
>Isn't that *literally* what every news network has done with trump?
No. Trump's just that stupid and corrupt. An accurate portrait is definitionally not a caricature, no matter how awful you look in it.

Maliciously lying about someone isn't legal, as Trump himself found out recently.';

'>>1291425
>Bernie Convention standards
Oh well, how about that?
>Author's rights under the Berne Convention must be automatic; it is prohibited to require formal registration. However, when the United States joined the convention on 1 March 1989,[6] it continued to make statutory damages and attorney's fees only available for registered works.
Ok, well wait a minute, there's a problem...';

'>>1291426
>No. Trump's just that stupid and corrupt.
So yes, because using your tax payer funded salary to participate in human trafficking of prostitutes and smoking crack is both stupid and corrupt. Gotcha.

>An accurate portrait is definitionally not a caricature
Given that the reporting on Hunter has been accurate, despite leftists best attempt to obfuscate the issue and outright lie about his crimes, he's hardly been made into a caricature. No more so than he's made one of himself, at the least.

>Maliciously lying about someone isn't legal, as Trump himself found out recently.
Good thing Fox hasn't been lying about Hunter at all. In-fact the only lies about Hunter come from the libshit pissbabies who still cry about his laptop being Russian disinfo, despite it being confirmed by the multiple law enforcement agencies charging Hunter with crimes.';

'>>1291427
You can register a copyright after the fact, fucking idiot.
>In the US, registering after an infringement only enables one to receive actual damages and lost profits.
Literally all registering in advance does is ensure you'll have your attorney's fees covered if you win a copyright case.';

'>>1291428
>because using your tax payer funded salary to participate in human trafficking
Nobody said anything about Texas or Florida's governors.

>Given that the reporting on Hunter has been accurate
Lol

>Good thing Fox hasn't been lying about Hunter at all
Lmao even';

'>>1291400
Least homosexual post ITT';

'>>1291429
>You can register a copyright after the fact, fucking idiot.
lol what are you talking about man
do you think Hunter is going to apply for a copyright on the videos he took of himself smoking crack and fucking whores?

Is that really what you're saying here? Because that's fucking gold bro.';

'>>1291430
>Nobody said anything about Texas or Florida's governors.
Correct, we're talking about Hunter Biden paying for prostitutes to be trafficking for his use.

>>Given that the reporting on Hunter has been accurate
>Lol
I'm glad you have no argument and you agree. Feel free to prove otherwise.

>>Good thing Fox hasn't been lying about Hunter at all
>Lmao even
Again, feel free to prove otherwise. Note: crying about the laptop being fake is an automatic concession on your point, it's documented as real and you don't get to lie about it anymore.

>>1291431
>he's gonna start sucking dick to get the last word again
You greedy slut';

'>>1291399
51 CIA intelligence officials signed a letter saying it was Russian disinformation.

Republicans keenly noted that the laptop contained CSAM of Hunter banging his underaged niece, which democrats tried to cover up.

"NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW!"';

'>>1291434
>51 CIA agents offered their opinion, which was wrong
Cool. Laptop still confirmed as real though.

>The laptop was real: DOJ confirms in new court filing it indeed belonged to Hunter Biden
https://abc3340.com/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi

Again, this is a settled topic.';

'>>1291429
Oh man...
>The Effective Date of copyright registration is important to know because without it (17 USC §411(a) of the Copyright Act), a court does not have jurisdiction to hear a copyright infringement case. In Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v Wall-Street.Com, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that registration of a work exists when the Copyright Office registers the copyright in the work, not when an applicant submits an application. While it is great to have clarity, this answer does not solve the dilemma of a copyright owner wanting to request the special relief of statutory damages and attorney fees (17 USC §504(c)) against an infringer because such remedies are available only if registration precedes the infringement.
What does "precedes" mean again?';

'>>1291429
Why did you run away, faggot? I was having fun. =(';

'>>1291436
Definitely the guy who takes selfies of himself smoking crack would've copywritten said selfies before forgetting he left them on his laptop. Bulletproof legal case here';

'>>1291439
It gets so quiet when the shills scatter.';

'>>1291400
projecting again, I see';

'>>1291439
Pretty much this lol the copyright argument is laughable he's going to get laughed out of court';

'>>1291434
>>1291435
Imagine being this gullible';

'>>1291440
No one wants to engage with your mental illness. Why would they? In your head you're always going to be right no matter how wrong you really are.';

'>>1291432
Yes. He will. It costs him virtually nothing and lets him pursue an easy lawsuit. Why wouldn't he? It's not like the pics go away if he doesn't.';

'>>1291436
You're just repeating what I said, dipshit.';

'>>1291437
Some of us have lives, dumb bitch. Can't just sit around taking cock all day.';

'>>1291473
I think you're very confused, dumbass. Maybe copyright works that way in your eurotrash country, but it doesn't work that way in the US. I even linked you the criminal code that clarifies that you can't sue someone for copyright infringement if you haven't copyrighted the material before the "infringement" occurred.

Just take your meds.';

'ITT kneejerking faggots don't know the difference between a laptop and an external hard drive';

'>>1291476
Imagine moving the goalpost all the way from
>It's Russian disinformation
to
> ackshually it was an external hard drive not a laptop
And not realizing you look retarded to anyone paying attention';

'>>1291482
I can understand how you would want to blame you being so wrong and not understanding the facts of the case on me "moving the goalposts" when you apparently never knew where the goalposts originally were in the first place or how many goalposts there were.';

'>>1291482
Good post';

'>>1291476
Both contained hunters data.
The laptop itself was seized by the FBI in 2016
Isaac's personal hard drive contained a copy of the data which he distributed to various figures';

'>>1291486
Agreed';

'>>1291491
>Both contained hunters data.
No they didn't.';

'>>1291486
>>1291492
oops actually meant for >>1291484';

'>>1291494
Shut up retard';

'>>1291493
Hunter seems to think they did, so I don't really care what you think on the matter, you're kind of just stupid';

'>>1291500
chud headcanon is so wild';

'>>1291499
Fuck off boomer';

'russia really doesn't want to let this talking point go';

'>>1291502
Are you implying that Hunter is actually claiming he owns the copyright to Russian disinformation?
Of so then bigly story!';

'>>1291504
When you people are retards, you are very easy to call out.

The whole point of this article is Hunter is suing for people distributing the contemt found on his laptop.

Idk how you can even argue that it's not Hunter's data giving he's literally suing everybody he can over distributing it, even the laptop repairman he forgot to pay because he was so high on crack cocaine';

'>>1291507
>>1291510
How much longer are you going to keep perpetuating Rudy Guiliani's conspiracy theory? Do you not realize millions of people are laughing at you people?';

'>>1291512
As long as Comer and Grassley and Jim "sleeveless" Jordan keep telling the sheep it's real then they will believe it.';

'>>1291493
>Hunter is claiming he owns a copyright over a bunch of stuff he has nothing to do with
So I guess it'll be thrown out of court even quicker than I had thought';

'>>1291515
Either way you'll never know because you learn everything you know about the case from right wing twitter accounts and rumble videos.';

'>>1291512
>He's gonna sue Fox News for copyright violations on the videos he recorded of himself smoking crack and fucking underage whores
>Also, none of it really happened
This is what pure cognitive dissonance looks like.';

'>>1291512
Your not very good at gas lighting, specially when you're in an article where the guy in question is saying it's his data and he's suing people for distributing it';

'>>1291517
This.
This retard shill we are talking to is one of the most retarded people on this board';

'>>1291517
When none of the things you claim are going to happen in your crazy headcanon actually happen I'll be here to laugh at you.

>>1291518
That's funny because you're actually the one trying to spread a 5 year old debunked conspiracy theory out of lack of anything else to run a presidential campaign on.';

'>>1291520
Bro just shut up already, you're probably the only person left who thinks this is all fake, the dude is literally suing everyone over releasing his data, every post you say otherwise just makes you sound more retarded';

'https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-data-analysis/';

'>>1291523
is the screen literally covered in cum?';

'>>1291523
>Copy of what's believed to be Hunter Biden's laptop data turned over by repair shop to FBI showed no tampering, analysis says
>By Catherine Herridge, Graham Kates
>November 21, 2022 / 6:14 PM EST / CBS News
>Data from a laptop that the lawyer for a Delaware computer repair shop owner says was left by Hunter Biden in 2019 – and which the shop owner later provided to the FBI under subpoena – shows no evidence of tampering or fabrication, according to an independent review commissioned by CBS News.
Oomph.
That's gonna be a big L for Libbot Shillmeister';

'>>1291525
Not really considering Bill Barr had all the time in the world to file charges in 2019-2020 and didn't because there isn't anything incriminating on there. But of course you already knew that and keep perpetuating the conspiracy theory because you've got nothing else.';

'>>1291521
The truth isn't going away no matter how much you whine and scream about how much it hurts you.';

'>Biden sued Giuliani and several limited liability companies he owns, along with Giuliani’s attorney Robert Costello and 10 unnamed individuals, accusing them of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, California Computer Data Access and Fraud Act and rules against unfair business practices.

>The lawsuit takes issue with Giuliani and Costello’s possession of Biden’s “laptop”—which the lawsuit notes is not an actual laptop, but rather “an ‘external drive’ that Defendants were told contained hundreds of gigabytes of Plaintiff’s personal data”—which the defendants have allegedly illegally hacked and tampered with, making “further alterations and damage to the data.”';

'>>1291529
>The lawsuit takes issue with Giuliani and Costello’s possession of Biden’s “laptop”—which the lawsuit notes is not an actual laptop, but rather “an ‘external drive’ that Defendants were told contained hundreds of gigabytes of Plaintiff’s personal data”
100% correct
The laptop was turned over to the FBI in 2016.
The hard drive was a copy of the laptop data retained by John Mac isaac, later turned over to other individuals.

The original copy of data on the hard drive has been validated by Independent News organizations, see above.

The actual laptop itself as far as I know the FBI has held on to and they haven't released any public statements about it except for the fact that they seized it in 2016';

'>>1291530
yet he's suing giuliani for tampering, among other illegalities';

'>>1291529
>Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, California Computer Data Access and Fraud Act and rules against unfair business practices.
>>1291529
>which the defendants have allegedly illegally hacked and tampered with, making “further alterations and damage to the data.”
Oh wow this is great, so he's implying it's his own personal data that Giuliani "altered" or "damaged" after they received it.

Giuliani, or somebody he gave it to did in fact do this, because there were some files that had been altered in some of the copies of the hard drive data that was floating around after the fact.

The original hard drive data, which has still did this day been retained by John Mac isaac, has been unaltered according to independent investigations, once again see the link above';

'>>1291532
>he's suing giuliani for tampering
Tampering with Russian disinformation?
Or tampering with hunters own personal data?';

'>>1291399
the laptop that rudy found (credible), that hunter shipped many states over because the family of the vice president of the united states doesnt have an IT guy (credible).

does anyone even know what kind of laptop it is or what fucking color it is? has anyone even physically seen this thing? we're coming up on 5 years of hearing about this thing. it all seems very fake and gay.';

'>>1291538
Imagine being so indoctrinated you think Rudy Guiliani's version of events is real.';

'>>1291540
they get paid to do so, i believe';

'Oh ffs he's not just acting retarded but now he's samefagging';

'>>1291537
crickets';

'>>1291541
I blame Donald J. Trump for making people stupider.';

'>>1291538
>>1291523
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-data-analysis/
>>1291524
Yes, I already commented on it, the picture is right there. It looks like the screen is covered in some sort of cum-like substance.';

'>>1291545
You already know the laptop wasn't his data, you're just playing dumb now.';

'>>1291543
you know this is an anonymous website, right dummy?';

'>>1291551
Don't bother, he thinks everyone to the left of Steve Bannon is the same poster';

'>>1291550
Ah, so hunter is accusing Giuliani of hacking Russian disinformation!
What a twist! The plot thickens!';

'>>1291540
>>1291541
>>1291552
>>1291551
Really, I know your extremely mentally retarded and all but if your going to samefag so fkn much and want people to believe you, wait longer than the 60 timeout every time you want to reply to yourself

You really are retarded, samefag-kun';

'>>1291553
Direct quote from the article:
>conspiracy and subsequent actions to defame Mr. Biden and paint him in a false light,
This is what you are still trying to perpetuate, and again I can't stress enough that the only reason this debunked bullshit keeps coming up is lack of anything else for the GOP to run on in this election year.';

'>>1291555
you don't even know how to use contractions, retard. why would anyone listen to you';

'>>1291555
>the poster who thinks Rudy Guiliani is trustworthy is calling other people retarded
top kek';

'>>1291556
The fact your conspiracy theory needs a new twist every time someone points why it's hunters data and he's suing people for releasing it really just makes you look stupid.';

'>>1291559
I haven't mentioned him once, and I even said he altered the data given to him.

But damn son, you been samefagging this thread and acting like a retard the whole time

You really are a sad sad little person';

'>>1291561
i wonder when the last time was you went a day without lying';

'>>1291561
Are the samefags in the room now?';

'It's amazing to me that all mainstream news and sources, even hunter himself has admitted the data belongs to hunter, yet somehow, there is someone who is actually mentally ill enough on this board to argue otherwise';

'>>1291565
weird you'd believe giuliani when he's such an egregious liar that his law license was suspended';

'>>1291540
imagine thinking i thought he was. wew.';

'>>1291548
>https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-data-analysis/

>what's believed to be
>analysis says
wew';

'>>1291579
Does it have a picture of the laptop or not? Because that's why I linked it, faggot.';

'>>1291576
>Rudy said so I believe it, and that's final
Ok boomer';

'>>1291441
You wish I was projecting those dick pics you gay faggot';

'>>1291586
Jealous again, Anon?';

'>>1291402
>MTG had her vagina juices on the pix of Hunter that she showed in congress.

BLEEECH!!1


>Hunter should look into suing her.
She dont got a lot, but that's even better to hurt her';

'>>1291405
>>post photos to the internet
Hunter didn't post them you moron.
They were stolen from his laptop, that's why it's called revenge porn';

'>>1291596
It wasn't his laptop.';

'>>1291581
"what is believed to be" does not mean here it definitely is.

>>1291582
i dont believe anything he says. your reading comprehension is poor.';

'>>1291601
can you try to be honest';

'>>1291601
Sure, idk what your conspiracy theory is anon, it was filled with his data and he's suing that his data was leaked.

IDC that you think Rudy Giuliani hacked a non existent laptop and uploaded perfect clones of gigabytes of actual hunter Biden data onto this non existent laptop or whatever the fuck your crazy cope is';

'>>1291639
those dick pics were copyright protected, chud. drumpf will pay for this';

'>>1291649
It's really weird how you people have conflated
>the unlicensed commercial exploitation of his image,
with copyright violations';

'>>1291649
>those dick pics were copyright protected
this still makes me laugh every time I think about it';

'>>1291652
chud headcanon makes you laugh?';

'https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-quietly-deletes-hunter-biden-mock-trial-special-following-lawsuit-threat
Fox News deleting their smear campaign since Hunter has them dead to rights for a defamation suit';

'>>1291665
>Defamation suit based on things he did
Good luck, Penis Biden.';

'>>1291652
All creative works made by humans are copyright protected by default.';

'>>1291669
>based on things he did
How'd that work out with Dominion?

You thinking someone did something and someone actually doing the thing aren't the same thing for redhats (cultists)';

'>>1291672
This is eurotrash nonsense that literally doesn't apply to the US, at all.';

'>>1291672
The lawsuit was talking about 'his likeness' not actual photos, but don't let that get in the way of a good chud false narrative.';

'>>1291672
Fair use is no longer a thing?';

'>>1291677
Since when are news agencies not able to report on the likeness of the current president's son and/or his activities?';

'Hunters probably just sour hes already been sued himself by John Isaac for defamation.

At this point he knows he owes a few million to Isaac and he's just trying to find a way to make the money that doesn't include foreign grifting and corruption rackets with his dad';

'Hunter Biden literally caused this';

'>>1291679
For the purpose of defamation? Never. If FOX can defend that they truly believed the claims they were making about him to be true they'll win their case. If they can't, they won't.';

'>>1291711
the onus is on biden to prove that something defamatory was said at all. i sincerely doubt anyone could even demonstrate as much.';

'>>1291715
>the onus is on biden to prove that something defamatory was said at all
Well, not particularly. He has to prove damages, firstly, and then he has to prove intent. FOX isn't going to argue they didn't say things that reflected negatively on Biden. That's a given. They're going to argue that they said those things in good faith, believing that they were true. Its only defamation if they knowingly said those things knowing that they knew were false.

>i sincerely doubt anyone could even demonstrate as much.
People do all of the time, anon. Intent is the foundation of like 85% of our entire criminal code. Intent is only irrelevant in statutory offenses.';

'>>1291715
Fox lost their last their defamation case, so I don't think it's very likely they'd win this one either.';

'>>1291718
>>1291719
what false things did fox say about hunter biden?';

'>>1291724
>what false things did fox say about hunter biden?
I have no clue what Biden is alleging was false. I haven't read over the case. I'm not arguing one way or the other. I'm just explaining what defamation is and what the burden of evidence is.';

'>>1291727
>dunning kruger moment';

'>>1291718
He doesn't have to prove they knew it was false. The
>with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not
standard will be a slam dunk, especially with discovery.

Frankly more people should sue Fox. We know they aren't careful on internal comms, and they're biased as shit.';

'>>1291728
Could you tell me what I just said that was incorrect?';

'>>1291676
No, it isn't, dipshit

>>1291676
>Fair use is no longer a thing?
Why would fair use apply to literally stolen photos that everyone knew and admitted were stolen?

Also fair use doesn't mean something wasn't copyrighted. That's public domain.';

'>>1291730
Not him but you're a retard who can't read.
>Much of the letter is focused on a six-part “mock trial” titled “The Trial of Hunter Biden” that aired in October 2021, described by Fox as what a trial might look like if Biden was charged with Foreign Agents Registration Act or bribery charges — neither of which Biden has been charged with. “While using certain true information, the series intentionally manipulates the facts, distorts the truth, narrates happenings out of context, and invents dialogue intended to entertain. Thus, the viewer of the series cannot decipher what is fact and what is fiction,” the letter says. The letter demands that the series be removed from all streaming services.
Fox removed the content today according to >>1291665';

'>>1291733
>Not him but you're a retard who can't read.
Ironic, seeing as how literally 3 posts ago I explicitly said that I hadn't read over the case nor do I know what specific claims Biden is using as the basis for his lawsuit. My post was specifically talking about the legal parameters of defamation and what both sides had to prove, not the evidentiary accuracy of any claims being made. If you had bothered to read the previous posts you may have avoided this embarrassing shitpost.';

'>>1291732
I can see you are woefully ignorant of US law. I already even linked it in the thread. Nor do you seem to have any clue what "fair use" means. You can continue being an ignorant foreigner faggot though, and nobody can stop you.';

'>>1291734
It isn't ironic at all, you're simply a dumbass who can't be bothered to read the op article.';

'>>1291736
>It isn't ironic at all
Well, it is. You're criticizing me for not knowing a thing that I freely admitted not knowing at the beginning of my post. You call me a retard who can't read yet you unironically responded to me without reading what I said. This is the definition of irony.

>you're simply a dumbass who can't be bothered to read the op article
Well, good thing nothing I said had anything to do with the evidentiary claims cited in the article. Its almost like if you had read and processed what I said you would've known this.';

'>>1291735
>Nor do you seem to have any clue what "fair use" means

>Fair use gives users the right to use
>>copyrighted
>material without permission under certain circumstances
>https://copyright.psu.edu/copyright-basics/fair-use/

Fuck off Europoor';

'>>1291735
>>1291742
Also, this shit fails like every fair use standard except arguably educational and that's only if you take the matter to be of public interest, which it's not.

Using unpublished works obtained in bad faith in their entirety is a fucking nono.';

'>>1291639
there is a thing called a cloud server you know. this physical laptop is no where to be seen for YEARS now.

the story is make up by rudy. it's fake and gay.';

'>>1291744
>It's all fake!
>Giuliani hacked an imaginary laptop and put 128 GB of hunters data on it!
>There is no laptop!
>The pictures of it in the news are fake!
>The FBI made it all up!
Lmao you are legit retarded anon';

'>>1291744
So John Mac Isaac hacked the apple cloud and stole hunters data? And got the local files off his laptop too!?
Holy smokes anon, you better give MSNBC a tip about your conspiracy theory!';

'>>1291744
>According to reports on January 16, 2024, new filings by the U.S. Department of Justice's special counsel, headed by David C. Weiss, appear to be the first public confirmation of the laptop's authenticity by the DOJ. The filings refer to the laptop connected to Hunter Biden stating, “the defendant’s Apple MacBook Pro, which he had left at a computer store.”[68]
Even the DOJ acknowledges the laptop factually belonged to Biden';

'Dark Hunter Returns. There will be blood.';

'>>1291744
>people still claiming the laptop wasn't real and that it was an external HDD

https://abc3340.com/news/nation-world/the-laptop-was-real-doj-confirms-in-new-court-filing-it-indeed-belonged-to-hunter-biden-capitol-hill-deposition-investigation-business-deals-james-comer-house-oversight-committee-computer-repair-shop-new-york-post-article-special-counsel-david-weissi

>But the Department of Justice now, for the first time, has confirmed the laptop was Hunter's, an Apple MacBook Pro that he had left at a computer repair shop.

>The Jan. 16, 2024 court filing from special counsel David Weiss, opposing Hunter Biden's motion to dismiss the case against him, states: "A search warrant was also obtained for his laptop and the results of the search were largely duplicative of information investigators had already obtained from Apple"

So again, both the DOJ and FBI are saying the laptop was real, and that it was in fact a lap top and not an external HDD. Which means further attempts to argue otherwise are at this point, bad faith and can be summarily dismissed by calling you a Hunterfaggot, as your continued insistence and peddling this debunked narrative can only stem from your deep need to be gay lickspittle for him';

'>>1291755
>calling you a Hunterfaggot, as your continued insistence and peddling this debunked narrative can only stem from your deep need to be gay lickspittle for him

>it was an external HDD
>an Apple MacBook Pro that he had left at a computer repair shop

I said cloud and you came out blazing with this. Your reading comprehension is poor.';

'>>1291768
you said cloud and you were wrong. you then got btfo and now you're coping.';

'>>1291746
>still conflating the external hard drive with some random laptop from a blind guy
who is supposed to believe this';

'>>1291743
The president's son filming himself smoking crack and fucking whores isn't of public interest? Well, agree to disagree I guess, faggot.';

'Fox News pulls down series as Hunter Biden threatens lawsuit

Fox News has pulled down a six-part series in which it staged a mock trial of hypothetical criminal charges against Hunter Biden after the president's son threatened to sue the network.

The series, which was first posted on the cable network's right-wing streaming service back in October 2022, was removed only a day after Biden's legal team publicly made its threat.
https://www.npr.org/2024/04/30/1248275971/fox-news-hunter-biden-series-lawsuit-threat';

'>>1291837
Those pixs of Jennifer Lawrence's pussy were of interest to the public, but they were stolen, just like Hunter's. He didn't post them on the internet.
What;s so difficult about understanding this, stupid people?

what if i hacked your fat mama's apple acct and showed her roast beef on a porn site?';

'>>1291853
>Those pixs of Jennifer Lawrence's pussy were of interest to the public
If you could successfully argue that in court then you could make a case of fair use; however I do think there's a signifcant difference between the son of the president filming himself engaging in illegal activities and a celebrity's nude photos being leaked.

But if Democrats really want to lower that bar so much that Hunter can bunny-hop over it, I'm willing to watch and laugh.';

'>>1291853
Hunters laptop wasn't stolen you lying fool.
The computer repair guy should sue you for defamation.
The laptop became the computer repair guys property when Hunter didn't pay for the repair work, dumbass.
You are the stupidest motherfucker on this site by a long way.';

'>>1291853
They're evil, they fully understand it's wrong but they don't care';

'>>1291853
pretty sure fox never broadcast hunter biden's cock and balls on air. regardless, shills have now moved the goalposts all the way from "the laptop is russian disinformation" to "it was morally wrong"';

'>>1291768
>>1291791
>hunterfaggots coping poorly
Lmao

>>1291853
>random celebrity gettingbher casting couch blackmail exposed
>vs son of the fucking president participating in human trafficking and smoking drugs his father put people in jail for
Yeah not comparable, but nice try hunterfaggot';

'>>1291867
Good post';

'>>1291867
The computer repair guy had his home raided by the feds. Pretty sure he doesn't want to deal with this shit anymore.';

'>>1291877
>Hunterfaggots
You're the ones obsessed with him and his penis. Can you do anything but lie and project?';

'>>1291907
Why do you people lie left and right every fucking time a hunter Biden thread pops up';

'>>1291892
oops meant for >>1291853';

'>>1291927
Shut up retard';

'>>1291930
No.';

'>>1291837
>The president's son filming himself smoking crack and fucking whores isn't of public interest?
No. The president's son wasn't a part of his political operation. What possible impact could him smoking crack and fucking whores have on the public?';

'>>1291937
as long as we focus on him, kushner's 2 billion dollar saudi bribe stays in the background';

'>>1291937
>What possible impact could him smoking crack and fucking whores have on the public?

I spent all my $ savings on crack whores and I'm a senior and Hunter caused this because he's so cool and a role model and I wanted to be have a son just like him so we could do this stuff together(no incest homohk stuff).';

'>>1291937
>No. The president's son wasn't a part of his political operation.
I think sharing bank accounts with Joe and accepting bribes and jobs in Ukraine that he doesn't qualify for makes him part of the political operation.';

'>>1291938
That's a shitty what-a-butt-ism if you ask me.
Might wanna WIPE yourself off the face of the planet via sudoku, faggot.';

'>>1291863
>a celebrity's nude photos being leaked.
Stolen when Apple cloud was hacked>>1291867
>bad post

>The laptop became the computer repair guys property when Hunter didn't pay for the repair work


It's in the Geek Squad contract. all materials found on the device are the personal property of the client unless illegal by US law.

>>1291876
>"it was morally wrong"
No, it's illegally wrong.

>>1291877
>random celebrity gettingbher casting couch blackmail exposed
>vs son of the fucking president participating in human trafficking and smoking drugs
no human trafficing shill
and it dont matter who it is, dummy.';

'>>1291978
>illegally wrong
so legally right? agreed';

'>>1291978
>It's in the Geek Squad contract. all materials found on the device are the personal property of the client unless illegal by US law.
Repair shops typically have a boilerplate agreement (which was the case here) that if you abandon your property at their store that they own it after a certain period of time. This is usually 60-90 days. A lot of machines get abandoned at laptop repair shops; my first job was working at one 20 years ago. They all have this agreement.';

'>>1292029
good point, but you're forgetting that the crack smoking dick pic selfies were copyright protected.';

'>>1292056
Hunter's likeness is what is actually copyright protected and the suit is actually over defaming him with fake material.';

'>>1292059
which materials were fake?';

'>>1291396
I like Hunter, but I'm going to need a few more pictures of his cock if I'm gonna vote for the guy';

'>>1292067
t. one of 51 intelligence officials';

'>>1292065
Factually speaking, none';

'>>1292059
>Hunter's likeness is what is actually copyright protected
When did he apply for a copyright on his own likeness?';

'>>1291978
Check.
So you're finally admitting it was Hunters laptop and all the incriminating evidence on it is true.';

'>>1291404
yes, they were slobbering over those too.';