'undefined';

'>>21931951
I like fur on that far right chick, but the bodies are horrendous.';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21931951
holy fuck great hairy cunt on the one on the right';

'>>21931951';

'undefined';

'>>21931951';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21931951';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21932156
Fuck, I want to impregnate the three of them on spot.';

'why are nudists always the last people that you ever want to see nude?';

'>>21934151
Same reason why dating site users are the last people you'd ever want to date.';

'>>21932151
Love this euro body';

'>>21932165
MOAR redheads';

'>>21934151
meh. I've never been to a nude beach irl. but unless she's obese, then it doesn't really matter. big tits are big tits, and a fat ass is a fat ass. you get to enjoy the view at the nude beach at least.';

'>>21934151
because they think by becoming nudists, it's their chance to see attractive people nude.
a lot of them are also exhibitionists who just want to expose themselves to others.';

'undefined';

'>>21934341';

'>>21934341';

'undefined';

'>>21935687
Interesting looking beach there';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21934151
Idk saw plenty of hot nudists in Europe, less so in America';

'>>21934529
Anon...';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21932157
>File
super weird legs on the right below the knee, wtf';

'>>21936123
most nudists are old people, with wrinkly, leathery skin trying to relive old times. the truth is that nudism is just not that popular with younger people anymore, compared to the 1970's and 80's.';

'>>21937102
Most. Not all. There’s a nude beach in New Jersey I frequent. On nice Saturdays there are dozens and dozens of hot young women prancing around naked. Nudism has made a big comeback as women have become even more sexually liberated whores.';

'>>21937142
as they say, pics or it didn't happen';

'>>21931953
The three on the left are your typical nudist beach enjoyers.';

'undefined';

'ew';

'>>21936720
more?';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21937654
Leilani Dowding';

'>>21937654';

'>>21937654
>>21938057';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21935952
classic pic and still epic. wherever shes at i hope she had lots of beautiful babies';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21936436
what?????';

'>>21934151
Because nudism isn't about showing off, it's about being comfortable. So sick of this type of question.';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21937142
Can confirm that sandy hook has hot girls on Saturdays in the summer. Always a few. Always more creepy old men but still';

'wife';

'undefined';

'>>21941628
>Outdoors
>Wearing a fucking mask
Retarded bitch';

'>>21940216
Apparently that pro model who was in her mid 20s when that pic was taken was not allowed.';

'undefined';

'>>21942835
Kek';

'>>21942835
It's just as stupid indoors. Mask have been proven time and time again to be completely ineffective against airborne viruses.
Wearing a mask is basically the sign of a brainwashed hivemind retard.';

'>>21943421
A brainwashed hivemind retard who believes/does everything the globalist totalitarian oppressors say, I might add.';

'>>21943421
>>21943422
Seeth, long-coofer';

'>>21941306
This guys got jokes.';

'>>21941306
Maybe these people should eschew being comfortable.';

'>>21943646
Fat and old people are just as disgusting clothed as they are naked.';

'>>21943421
Sure buddy. Thats why the entire team wears them during surgery. Cuz they dont work.
You fucking moron.
Link to all the "evidence" you have of masks not working.';

'>>21943646
I remember the first time I saw people wearing pajamas out in town and I thought "well this is it, we've finally collapsed as a society".';

'>>21931951
I could have my way with all of these chicks. FUN!';

'>>21943811

Not the guy you're arguing with, but deductive reasoning tells me they work better outwards than inwards meaning, you're sick, use a mask to prevent being a human sized virus atomizer, but if you're healthy it's kinda meh, since you can't achieve a perfect seal with the common surgical mask and air will travel through the path of least resistance and thus still catching the virus. So as with most things, the "truth" seems to lie in the middle. They work, not just as well, and in the ways most people think.';

'>>21932157
The one of the right looks younger but that pussy more beaten up';

'>>21943811
You sound like someone who definitely got the jab.';

'>>21943925
and you sound like a colossal retard';

'>>21943938
Yeah, you definitely suffer from the typical brainrot caused by the jab.';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21943811
>during surgery
non med fag obedient covidiot detected. The reason you wear masks in surgery is because you literally are protecting your own face from potential fluids and you have a fucking open body in front of you for the operation. It literally has nothing to do with catching a cold or any respiratory virus you fucking retard. Literally ask any surgeon or anyone involved in the surgical room at all. Holy shit you maskers are stupid.';

'undefined';

'>>21943965
a beautiful body absolutely ruined by tattoos';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21943968
Aren't surgical masks mean to prevent the surgeon from contaminating the patient? The same way masks in public use are meant to keep you from spreading a virus if you're sick, the same way Japanese have been wearing masks every flue season for years.';

'>>21943990
You are conflating respiratory virus with the surgical field. There are studies on this. The mask in surgery has nothing to do with the Covidiots who wear them because they are obedient retards... here is a study for masks in the field. If you are capable of reading - you will see that these masks are mainly for splash and not viral despite what your Stephen Colbert grandma killing talking point told you - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/#:~:text=One%20prospective%20study%20revealed%20that,face%20in%2024%25%20of%20procedures.&text=The%20incidence%20of%20blood%2Fbodily,between%20settings%20and%20between%20individuals.

Also if you are looking for actual scientific studies on why masks are retarded and you are an obedient idiot for wearing them for covid - This is a good place to start if you are capable of reading and understanding the literature. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full?fbclid=IwAR32YbOOonMabgRx90Y7hbbsTqODwmWyXrrlH6sKPYlHfr-tzLRO_lp2M5U

Finally there are actual studies coming out that show the masks might have made Covid worse for the people wearing them. Which is common sense - but if you super care about the science here is an article that points to it. https://dailysceptic.org/2023/11/25/norwegian-researchers-find-masks-linked-with-covid-infections/?fbclid=IwAR0ujZpkuht_Y0CZUAEIjk7yXRxLV2q7q-5XSkiRYKJ809CdLDVSRVJ4edE

Also stop being an obedient dog that does what they are told by their masters, and just enjoy the fucking nudist thread.';

'>>21944513
Well here's a study that says masks in India were highly effective in reducing the spread of covid. They measured the spread in villages that complied and used masks and those that didn't and the masked villages had lower infection rates.
I think you've spent the last 4 years scouring obscure research journals and weirod websites to cherrypick studies that support you preconceived idiocy.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8184081/';

'>>21944521

This is a nude beach photo thread.';

'>>21943984
Love that body type! She’s amazingly sexy';

'undefined';

'>>21944521
My recollection in 2020 was that once COVID hit here (America), Americans, overall, were very compliant wearing masks. 100%? No. But in many areas, at least 90%. And yet, people still got it and people still died. So I guess we fall back on the old argument, "But if it saves one life, isn't it worth it?" Same could be said about designing cars not to exceed 35 mph, but people won't stand for it. It's a tradeoff. We accept certain risks in order to have certain freedoms. The nice thing is, if you like masks, you can wear them to your heart's content!! Me? I prefer to go maskless, even if there's a greater risk of getting sick. Personal choice.';

'>>21944604
Please share more';

'>>21944521
talking about cherry picked studdies that support preconceived idiocy...';

'Known this TikTok bitch with really nice tits for a long time... Was delighted to recently discover she got recorded by some creeper on a topless beach in Europe 10 years ago lol. Check em out, pretty glorious.';

'>>21944744';

'>>21944747';

'>>21944748';

'>>21944750';

'>>21941306
this';

'>>21944521
>links an abstract that is not even a study
>Literally reads "could have saved X" with no real way to copy or test any of the linked claims
>No where in abstract does it say "highly effective" in fact the read just gives details of various masks and if you understand the science you realize that only the N95 masks would have had any real effect if used properly - which no one was doing.
>Calls the Cochrane mask study that debunked all of the mask claims weirdo cherry picked studies even though it is from many journals over many years with actual parameters you can test yourself.

wtf am I reading in a nudist thread?';

'>>21941306
Those two things aren't mutually exclusive in my experience.';

'>>21941306
That's the usual excuse nudists give to normies, so as not to appear perverted. "It's all innocent." "It's not sexual". Spare us with that bullshit.
We all know the main reason people practice nudism is because they want to see other people nude and expose themselves, too.';

'undefined';

'>>21944513
Thanks for sharing the Cochrane review paper
If you look at Data extraction and management table 1., you'll see that many if the included surgically mask vs no mask studies show anywhere between 45% - 76% adherence to the mask intervention, meaning that those who were suppose to mask up didn't do so consistently, sometimes half the time
Hard to blame a protective device for failing if you don't use if often or properly.
Back to nudism.';

'>>21944513
I appreciate the links. I do like reading, so I will take the time to go over these, but as >>21945787 points out, there are factors that are overlooked. I myself wasn't ever a hardcore masker, but I wore it where it was necessary.

>>21944618
Personal choice except that people have to put up with your coughing, spitting when you talk, flinging crumbs from your mouth when you eat, etc.

>>21945734
Wrong. A good half of "nudists" probably are exactly what you say, but the movement is legit. Nudists go out of their way to distance it from sex, which maybe is a little unrealistic, but they do it so the public can understand. It might be seen as downright anti-sex by some, or disingenuous, like you say.

Of course people like seeing pretty naked women, the same way that we like seeing pretty women in the clothed world. And yes, there might be excitement from walking around nude with others, excitement because it's a disregard for a taboo, a little bit exhibitionist for others, but I'll put it this way: I've visited a nudist resort on the off-season, when it wasn't quite warm anymore, and the only person there was an old-ass man, but I still liked being there because I could walk anywhere I wanted without putting anything on, and could relax.

>>21945196
Only other nigga that gets it.

Anyway, here's a naked girl.';

'>>21946301
>And yes, there might be excitement from walking around nude with others, excitement because it's a disregard for a taboo, a little bit exhibitionist for others, but I'll put it this way: I've visited a nudist resort on the off-season, when it wasn't quite warm anymore, and the only person there was an old-ass man, but I still liked being there because I could walk anywhere I wanted without putting anything on, and could relax.
Well said. For me there absolutely is an exhibitionistic aspect to it; I absolutely love being seen naked and getting to see other naked people, but even on an occasion where I'm not around anyone and am not really being looked at, its genuinely kind of a bummer to put my clothes back on because it just feels amazing to be completely naked outside on a hot day and skinny dip in the ocean. The fact that some (like me) enjoy the exhibitionistic feeling of being seen naked doesn't negate the fact that there is still a completely wholesome pleasure to be had in enjoying the feeling of being outside in your natural state.';

'>>21944744
>TikTok
username??';

'>>21946301
Epic pic!! It's always nice to read someone who knows syntax and grammar.';

'>>21946385
>The fact that some (like me) enjoy the exhibitionistic feeling of being seen naked doesn't negate the fact that there is still a completely wholesome pleasure to be had in enjoying the feeling of being outside in your natural state.
Bears repeating. Cheers, nudist anon.';

'>>21946413
Thanks friend, always great to talk to likeminded people here. I can hardly explain how much I'm looking forward to summer and getting to the nude beaches again. Have go gone before?';

'>>21946559
I haven't done beaches (except for one quick visit with friends who were curious), but pre-COVID, I went to resorts all the time. There are several near me. Was trying to go back to my favorite one last year but scheduling didn't work out. Was traveling also and stopped by a new one in a different state but didn't love it. I plan to come back in a big way this year, though, I have a small trip planned with a nude yacht trip stopping along several nude beaches, and a shuttle from a nearby nude AirBnB. Can't wait.';

'undefined';

'>>21946588
>The charges, officer?';

'>>21946582
Nice, I'd love to go to a nudist resort but there's none near me; now that I've recently broken out of NEETville and gotten a pretty solid job I might look at travelling in the next couple of years. Cap d'Agde has always sounded cool to me; a whole large town where you can walk the streets totally naked with no consequences is basically a dream to me, I really want to make it someday.';

'undefined';

'>>21946638';

'>>21946638
>>21946639
cute';

'>>21931951
has anyone been to a nudist resort? it feels kinda nice walking around naked, i don't even care that much about seeing naked women. although, i'd much rather be around naked women than old dudes with saggy balls. but does anyone else feel like this? the sensation of the sun hitting your entire body feels amazing.';

'>>21946638
>>21946639
I wonder how a lot of these nudist pics that clearly aren't voyeur images or OF models end up online. Do they get put up by the people in them, or are they pics that a boyfriend or someone put out unbeknownst to them?
I really enjoy the idea that these Indian women were just taking regular family pictures and they felt personally liberated and comfortable enough to just share like any other picture. They seem like sweet people and the idea of chill normie women who are also nudists and don't see why anyone would make a big deal out of being naked lives in my head rent free.';

'>>21946638
>>21946639
Seeing moms and daughters together like that, while rare, is also a great reason for nudism.';

'>>21946638
US has nude beaches?';

'undefined';

'>>21947062
Yeah, a nudist resort. It does feel free. There's some ugliness you have to deal with but some bonuses too. I've gone with girls and by myself. Going alone is too weird. Everyone acts pretty normal, nothing really that sexual.';

'>>21947565
A few. Notable ones are Gunnison Beach in New Jersey, Playalinda and Haulover in Florida, and Blacks Beach in California.';

'>>21947062
They're like regular resorts, just you can be naked. I love going and so does my girl. We love it, its never been sexual but we have checked out people for sure. Unless youre a virgin cuck that can't stay soft around women I'd say go for it';

'>>21932102
A long time ago there used to be a huge Beach Girls playlist on Vimeo. This was one of the vids. Anybody know where it went?';

'>>21948418
Not sure about the video, but the photo set is I Like This Euro Beach Gallery 125';

'undefined';

'i cant find this picture anywhere and it gets posted semi often in beach threads

its a topless redhead in a black bikini bottom walking down the waterline on the beach with her fully nude friend that breasts that are not as tan as the rest of her body';

'>>21944687

That criticism seems to cut both ways.';

'>>21943950
I jabbed your mom and she liked it.';

'Corfou beach
In greece, nudist beach is not separated from public beach. So if you go naked, you are in between clothed people';

'undefined';

'>>21949404
the way it should be :)';

'>>21949404
Great ass! would love to see more!
>>21932147
what a dream';

'>>21949446
Wow. A pretty young mother who, while busy caring for a toddler, still cares enough about herself to keep herself in shape, do her hair, makeup, jewelry, right down to fully waxing and grooming her pubic hair for others to see.

Sublimely, this may be the hottest pic on these boards right now.';

'I'm looking for recommendations for good nudist beaches in Europe';

'>>21942835
she probably just doesnt want to be recognized';

'>>21946638
>>21947565
I've been masturbating to nudist stuff for so long I instantly recognize its Haulover Beach from the skyscrapers.';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21951126 >>21951127
It's pretty obvious these are photoshopped: you can clearly see the outline of the removed clothes.
Why do you do this? It's not fun, and only you find it hot.
It goes against /s/ rules too...';

'>>21951152
are you retarded';

'>>21951152
You can literally reverse search that and find the bitches insta';

'>>21951213
And how does that make it any less fake?';

'>>21951222
>No this random has been shopping off the clothes of this clearly dressed woman for years despite not one part of it looking shopped

What has caused this paranoia for you?';

'>>21949404
All the better! The only thing more fun than being naked among other naked people is being seen naked by the fully dressed!';

'>>21951359
I'm a dedicated nudist and it's always weird to be at a clothing-optional (rather than nudity required) club and there are some people remaining dressed. It feels like you're put on the spot.

Strangely, I have repeat dreams about being in situations where I decide to be naked while others are not, it is somewhat accepted in the world of my dream, but people still give me looks.';

'>>21951359
why is she twirling her pubes';

'>>21951376
You never do that?';

'>>21951375
I enjoy the non-sexual reasons for nudism but I'm also a big CFNM and exhibitionism fan so I love the idea of going to a clothing optional venue and interacting with fully dressed people. My biggest fantasy since school has been to be the only one naked on a clothing optional beach and to run into whichever girls I'm crushing on, who are shocked to see the shy kid naked and start giggling, but when they find out its a nudist beach they encourage me, saying "hey, if you like letting it all hang out, then go for it man!". Then they bring me to their spot on the beach where the other girls from school/work/etc. are all hanging out and they react similarly, and I enjoy interacting with them as they stay clothed talking about my body and nudity.';

'>>21951433
Yeah, I can definitely admit that sounds pretty exciting.';

'>>21951433
I did something like that in college, three girls and me at the beach, it was early and off the path so we were alone,so I decided not to get my swim trunks wet. Spent a couple of hours just letting.it all hang out. Two were friends from back in HS, the third was beat friend's fiancee';

'>>21951433
>>21951452
>>21951578
Do you faggots infect every thread on every board?
What a queer fetish';

'>>21931952
That's one well abused butthole.';

'>>21951807
The fact one of them was impressed by my self-confidence and snuck into my room to drain my balls makes it less queer. And another one joined me in bearing it all when it was just the two of us';

'>>21951381
Not in public';

'>>21932147
Must be a europe thing because I've never seen nude woman on a beach this good between the pacific and Australia.';

'>>21951829
None of this happened. If you've been with a woman you'd realize why these fantasies sound absurd.
Do yourself a favor, if you're still young. Be someone a woman wants to fuck her, not some you think she wants to fuck. The latter will never happen. Do everything you can.
Get a girlfriend and love her and have her look up at you.
Congrats, you'll be cured of your perverse compulsions. No more threads about YMCA or bareassed 19th century boys or Keira Knightley in the Hole.
Every fucking board, I bet you guys have brought this shit to /n/ & /ck/ somehow';

'>>21951820
Who is this? So they really look like boxxy?';

'>>21951834
Well I'm assuming you're not naked in public, too.';

'>>21943970

A faggot...with an absolute faggot opinion.';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21951152
Those are tan lines. Skin gets darker, hairs get lighter.';

'Spain, so nice. Group of three about I'd guess 12-14 yo. Gorgeous girls, pussy hair, but basically no tits. All naked. Yup, didn't dare to photograph them. Just pure perfection. Let them just enjoy the natural beauty.';

'>>21952139
Now that's a happy, beautiful naked girl!
>>21952158
Don't take photos at a nudist resort or beach anyway, you dog.';

'>>21952069
>/ck/
sorry bro too late
owari da';

'>>21952164
Yeah, agreed. Just as I said. Purrrfect, never forget. But no fotozz.';

'undefined';

'>>21946638
>>21946639
Who are these two. I have seen these pictures for years .';

'undefined';

'>>21952221

why ugly bitches likes to show their ugly bodies ?';

'>>21952069
>Every fucking board, I bet you guys have brought this shit to /n/ & /ck/ somehow
Since when is CFNM inescapable? On 4chan and in general its a pretty underserved fetish, not like theres constant threads about it.
Your references (particularly The Hole) are pretty on point though, makes me think you're not making it up.
Are you the guy who was trying to cure me of it in the John Cena thread on the day of the Oscars lol?';

'>>21952327
Probably was me, I don't remember.
The fetish makes me unreasonably angry. Unlike most on here I've had some beautiful, intense relationships with women (and im not a sociopath) I can't really wrap my mind around it and don't want to. I get called insecure or whatever, even gay, when it's men seeking (a very feminine kind of) validation from (very put out into abstract masculinity) women and the whole thing is unquestionably gay AF.
That being said, every time it's the same thing. Same sneaky underhanded INsecure insertion of the fetish into the conversation followed by a bunch of bullshit where men are some belle of the ball to a bunch of cold, dry fag hags. Every single time. Get a new strategy ffs';

'>>21952387
>Probably was me, I don't remember.
>The fetish makes me unreasonably angry. Unlike most on here I've had some beautiful, intense relationships with women (and im not a sociopath) I can't really wrap my mind around it and don't want to. I get called insecure or whatever, even gay, when it's men seeking (a very feminine kind of) validation from (very put out into abstract masculinity) women and the whole thing is unquestionably gay AF.
At least looking at it from the vantage point of my own motivations for the fetish, I don't really see it as being sociopathic anymore than a woman's exhibitionist tendencies. I'm still a kissless virgin but I've at least made a female friend recently who I've had deep conversations with and spent time with, and while I would enjoy being seen naked by her, I wouldn't want it to be manipulative in nature or lead to her having less respect for me or my masculinity, as ridiculous as that probably sounds to you. You can call it gay or say it is a feminine impulse to want to be gazed upon in that way, and on the latter point you might be partially right, but at least in my CFNM fantasies I don't see it as being fundamentally compromizing to my masculinity or dignity in their eyes. Less about feminization or humiliation than being able to be comfortable nude in front of women I like while still being myself, and getting somewhat of a thrill from the vulnerability of it. More playful than anything.
>That being said, every time it's the same thing. Same sneaky underhanded INsecure insertion of the fetish into the conversation followed by a bunch of bullshit where men are some belle of the ball to a bunch of cold, dry fag hags. Every single time. Get a new strategy ffs
I honestly just don't recognize this trope or tendency from anything I've seen. I've heard of CFNM parties and I could see those being dismal like your description there, but idk.';

'>>21952289
That's why fags can comment on them.';

'>>21952404
Well, I wasn't calling you a sociopath. Just the general userbase. I wouldn't expect sociopathic teens to know what its like to find a secluded place on the beach and have his GF take off her sarong and be in a thong for him. Same goes for kissless virgins.
Aversion to 'cfnm' isn't as a fetish but as an insinuation- that men offer their bodies to a woman. Its perversely flaccid. It is everywhere in our culture because it reeks of sameness equality, gender inversion/subversion & makes men nonthreatening. It's also a eurotrash specialty and I hate Europeans and am glad they'll be replaced by Muslims.
Oh well, nothing personal.
Also, I was a limo driver, the kind that drives town cars. We worked for a stripper agency and so I was present at 25-30 bachelor parties and 4 bachelorette parties. I was security for the former; a witness for insurance at the latter.
Women are different from men, I don't really think humans begin to realize how much. It's female sexuality to be the stripper so to speak. Men and women kind of click that way. But watching bachelorette parties, where, ostensibly, the opposite is supposedly happening you see women for what they are- either sex objects, mother's or children. They're not men in women's bodies. Re: bachelorette party. They'll have fun with it, some of them, the gremlins & the hens but they are not at all turned on. In fact they're more turned on when at bachelor parties getting a proper lap dance from a woman and being lavished with attention from men providing.
Anyway, nothing personal. Just hate this fetish whenever it pops up';

'>>21934151
I live in Europe and nudism is a way of life, not something that looks for hedonism and/or lust as a goal.
You go to a nude beach (done it quite a few times) and the idea is to enjoy free of clothing, not to stare at the tits of the woman sitting under the umbrella next to you.
Hence why you see bodies of all shapes and ages (except for minors, as they have become something very rare nowadays which is good IMO).
After a couple of visits (even with my wife) I found I prefer to wear a good swim short. I don't know. Seems I never got it right. Actually I think naturism is hippy shit that from time to time gets hyped again. And that's perhaps why there are almost no zoomers and late millennials practicing it. I could tell 70% of population are boomers (the real ones, between 60 and 80 years old).';

'>>21952685
kys, gay faggot';

'>>21947684
That's a beautiful boob right there.';

'>>21952651
I think I agree with the general spirit of this at least with regards to differences between men and women. I certainly agree that there are differences between men and women and while there is room for outliers and even subversion on the margins (death by snu snu, step on me mommy, etc.), the attempts to flatten or deny these differences and their dynamics come at an enormous detriment to romanticism, eroticism and gender relations generally. I don't want to fundamentally change that dynamic, but there's certainly fun in playing with gender roles to a healthy degree with stuff like CFNM. I can understand your revulsion at certain dismal scenes at your work, but (not that I need strangers online to approve my fetishes) since you seem chill and reasonable I hope we've reached an understanding even if my fantasy >>21951433 isn't your thing.';

'>>21949307
Kill yourself retarded faggot';

'This thread went from ass & titties, to political arguments, studies, and insults...?';

'>>21952221
I remember her from the sunflower pics! Love her body. Please post more';

'I've been to nude beaches many times. It's so nice not to *have* to wear clothes, although I often will still wear a swimsuit if im laying around in sand, going swimming, just because I don't like sand in my butt. But being able to lay down on a towel, take off your clothes, and just soak up some sun, is an incredible feeling. It highlights just how bizarre it is to hide and shield our bodies from public view. Especially for women, it sucks. Can you imagine having to wear a swimsuit top every time you go to the beach or park, at the exact time you probably don't want to?

You don't go to nude beaches to stare at people's bodies, you go because it feels good to not wear clothes, and it feels good that no one cares either. It's very non-sexual. Although if I'm with my wife, things can *get* sexual because she's right there next to me, and, well, naked.

Really every beach in the world should be clothing optional. Just on principle. It's the fucking beach!';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21952136
several studies have shown links between tattoos and mental illness';

'>>21953739
Don't need studies to see the link between 4chan and mental illness.';

'>>21948511
Never seen that one before (or the gallery) but I have a couple more pics of that chick & her fantastic tits';

'>>21954194';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>21946301
>Personal choice except that people have to put up with your coughing, spitting when you talk, flinging crumbs from your mouth when you eat, etc.
right, except that you were also supposed to stay six feet apart, which eliminates this problem entirely. it's funny how your kind always conveniently forgets about this when you're trying to tell other people what to do. you can't even follow your own rules correctly, and you expect us to follow them too? when are you going to just admit that the whole thing was an excuse for you to be an asshole to other people and none of it had any basis in saving lives or good hygiene?';

'>>21931952
IA nudify shit';

'>>21954223
Is it weird that I prefer the one with the small tits? she also has the nicest hips.';

'>>21952651
Only gay retards like thongs.';

'>>21954922
pretty sure ai nudify was not around in 2013 you spastic retard';

'>>21952221
Dumb ai shit.. byou can fucking see it..';

'>>21942061
Can’t wait for it to warm up. Probably could have gone today.';

'>>21955199
Show us yer whaletail';

'>>21955485
Speak for yourself, stupid retard, if anyone asks you anything at all. Fucking fag..';

'undefined';

'>>21948403
I am not a virgin at all and am still worried I that I would get an accidental boner';

'>>21931952
don't know if i could resist pulling my dick out and sticking it in her ripe butthole. i could always say "oops! didn't see you!"';

'>>21948403
>Unless youre a virgin cuck that can't stay soft around women
There comes a time in a man's life where he has to accept they he has erectile dysfunction.
You have already crossed that point. No need to project your insecurities on other people.';

'>>21952136
Shut up you stupid male feminist cuck, he's right.
Tattoos are foreign objects and ruin womens bodies.';

'>>21949446
face looks AI generated.';

'>>21953662
DAMN! Look at those baby-choking nipples on that blonde!';

'>>21954327
It was fun asking people to show me the study proving social distancing worked and stopped the spread of covid. Or that those blue paper masks everybody wore even worked.

None of it worked. It was all to see what governments could voluntarily get people to do based on a lie of medical necessity.';

'>>21938818
Fuck off';

'undefined';

'>>21931951
Fat cunts';

'>>21954213
Literally perfect.';

'>>21949446
>crops out the toddler
gay';

'>>21943912
you mean she has bigger thicker inner labia? That has nothing to do with having sex. Yea it can get beat up with miles of meat but that isn't this';

'>>21943811
If you were to shrink down to the perspective of a covid particulate, the threads of the mask would be as wide as the grand canyon. You're just ignorant on this topic; masks don't stop anything other than massive things like mucus shooting out your throat.


Please never appeal to others doing the same thing as evidence that it works.... are you familiar with humanity and our history of ignorance?';

'>>21949404
I would have such a strong urge to hurt everyone there. Degenerates';

'>>21945262
republicans don't read studies, they just look for them and link them to each other while everyone pretends to have read it
and honestly if they actually read academic studies half as much as they pretend to, they wouldn't be republican in the first place
but this is all just an observation';

'>>21943970
based
>>21952136
cringe';

'>>21958841
that doesn't even make sense in this particular, are you reading the reply chain? I doubt you can read a study if you can't follow a shitty 4chan reply chain.';

'>>21944618
There's really no freedom to be gained from going maskless unless you have really sensitive skin or respiratory issues or something. And there are special masks designed for those people. Glad you brought up cars, because we have hundreds of laws regulating what people can drive, who can drive, how and where. Which are much bigger inconveniences in our daily life. Some people won't stand for driving the speed limit or obeying a traffic signal, and they get punished for it

>>21958829
A good example of the adage "a little truth is more dangerous than complete ignorance"

The primary means of respiratory viral travel is by hitching a ride on water particles that you constantly spew. Which masks are good at blocking. Absent of those water droplets, the virus can "float" through the mask but can't travel more than a few inches. Which is preferable than traveling 8-10 feet

https://www.livescience.com/face-mask-visualization-droplets-covid-19.html

>Please never appeal to others doing the same thing as evidence that it works

Sure, maybe every medical institution on the planet promoted useless masks as part of a grand conspiracy to....make you look silly. That makes total sense';

'undefined';

'>>21958920
Retard alert';

'>>21958920
Life pro tip: if you ever get outraged at people refusing to wear masks or adhere to lockdown mandates, just use your imagination and pretend they're looting, rioting, and chanting 'BLACK LIVES MATTER!"
Then not only will you completely ditch the whole Covid facade, but you'll justify their actions.
I'm just kidding: shitlibs don't have internal thoughts.';

'undefined';

'>>21958920
I'll be a retard too and take your bait.

That graph doesn't adjust for age, even though COVID mainly killed the elderly and even though Republican states skew much older. You should cite data from reliable sources, not from ACASignups.net (whatever that is). If you're bad at determining what's reliable, then you should default to peer-reviewed articles in scientific journals.

Your advice fails to account for the fact that people who follow your advice will do so imperfectly and might act differently on its basis - such as spending more time engaged in high-risk activities than people who are unmasked.

You imply that the only way this could've become mainstream medical advice is if every medical institution were conspiring, but that's obviously not true. There are many examples of moral panics throughout history where whole societies accepted quack advice to avoid bad luck, sins, etc. Bizarrely, you don't even acknowledge the fact that the mainstream medical advice at first was the *opposite* and then switched... *before* any of the evidence you cited became available!

Fortunately, we now have randomized controlled trials... which have found that masking generally doesn't work: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5/full

But even if everything you said were 100% correct, you could say similar things about drastically lowering the speed limit, but the mere fact that lowering the speed limit will save lives doesn't seem to be a good policy after cost-benefit analysis... for the same reasons as masking!';

'undefined';

'>>21949685
Pretty wholesome.

>>21958830
Jesus fuck. We got an influx of underage edgelords here.

>>21958829
>>>/pol/ Keep it there.';

'>>21949685

And yet I bet you’re a fat cunt with appalling personal hygiene and a wispy chin beard';

'>>21959207

Fuck off back to /pol/ you pathetic little nobody. Nobody likes you. Here or in real life.';

'undefined';

'>>21939560
Nice naked nigress';

'>>21959813
Admit that you personally experienced it on your mom';

'>>21947684
hail, fellow moonkist enjoyer';

'>>21959637
>Your advice fails to account for the fact that people who follow your advice will do so imperfectly and might act differently on its basis - such as spending more time engaged in high-risk activities than people who are unmasked.
Which is the same reason tards have for calling seatbelt laws gay.';

'>>21958292
yea just like how condoms never stopped the spread of stds. still raw dogging even with my herpes desu. fucking fake science bs. little soap and water good as new.';

'undefined';

'>>21936951
The muscles of the lower leg are supplied by the nerve roots from L5, that the lowest vertebra of your back, and S1, by the sacrum. She would be a wheelchair user, something has affected both sides, possibly spina bifida, or a spinal accident.';

'>>21958471
>>21954194
>35x1600)
>>21954196
>>21948564
>>21948511
finally someone with big tits';

'>>21962067
That's a false equivalence. equivalent of condom would be puting a plastic bag over your head and tying it off. you should try it.';

'>>21931951
THAR SHE BLOWS!
We've hit pay-dirt boys! A whole pod!
MAN THE HARPOONS!!';

'>>21937102
Generally that's true, but I've been a nudist for about 15 years and I'm still young.';

'>>21947062
I'm a member of a nudist club. It's in the mountains, so it's really secluded. Such a great place to get away from the city, go climb a mountain and get some fresh air.';

'>>21944513
Lmao you fucking imbecile half the people in the study didn't wear the masks so please go eat shit and die while the rest of us enjoy naked people

"if you are capable of reading and understanding this literature"

Well, what does one of the authors say?

"Authors' conclusions

The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions."

Yeah man wild anyway fuck off';

'>>21963205
no reason to argue with country bumpkin tier iq idiots about stuff that requires years of college education and passing exams to be certified to do so correctly.';

'>>21963205
>>21963381
lmfao';

'undefined';

'>>21958292
put the tin hat back on dude';

'>>21963545
finally a woman that knows what orifice to cover';

'>>21958292
https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2021/09/surgical-masks-covid-19.html
There you are retard.';

'>>21963684
Jesus fucking Christ I hate you people so goddamn bad I want you all dead. Anybody who frequently Reddits deserves execution.

From your own article, belligerent retard:
"We now have evidence from a randomized, controlled trial that mask promotion increases the use of face coverings and prevents the spread of COVID-19,”

How does it prevent the spread of COVID-19, you say? It doesn't fucking tell us. In fact it tells us that fear mongering poor retards in a 3rd world country forces them to stay inside. There was a .08% difference in infection rates, .08% difference in a village that did literally nothing and one where they propagandized people into believing they were going to die if they ventured outside.

How is that an ethical study, anyways? Part of the study involves creating a control group you are willingly exposing to a deadly pathogen, by their logic. Did not examine a single piece of empirical data around effectivity of masks or why individual mask types seemed more effective, did not examine exposure rates of mask wearers in close proximity to infected groups. Did not even test their study group for COVID-19, that portion was self reported by the same fucking group they admitted to confronting with propaganda ad-nauseum by religious leaders, sports stars, politicians and media.

Come back when you have a real study.

I want you to post a photo of your retarded smug redditor face wearing an "I fucking love science" shirt next to your wife and her boyfriend fucking on the couch you pedestrian faggot.';

'>>21963979
Okay you convinced me.';

'>>21963982
Just fucking think. All you types literally look at "the government says so" and "it's from Stanford, you think they'd fake a study?"

Listen, I've ran multiple research groups at a top 50 university. I've submitted multiple studies for peer review. Of there's one fucking thing I know, every single thing you read has an agenda to make somebody money or give somebody power. Don't give your brain the excuse of "this article agrees with my opinion and sounds smart, good enough for me." Actually read shit. Actually pour through the studies and assimilate the data. Compare that data to other studies. Look at who funds them. Ask why they are funding them. What do they gain by funding them.

If you think that the world of academia or your government has your health or interests in mind, you belong in a ditch next to every other faggot who trusted their politicians through all time.

Reality doesn't have to be censored for truth to stand out, truth stands on its own. It thrives in open discourse. Ask yourself why talking about this shit would get you banned on every major platform on the planet but here. It most definitely isn't the off chance some evangelical cunt might drink bleach somewhere in buttfuck Alabama.

Look at demographic information for any site on the internet right now and what they are pushing, why the fuck do Israeli and United States Airforce IP addresses spam an anime board 24/7 with BBC porn and tranny shit? Why is the number one contributor to Reddit Eglin Airforce Base? Why did the Soviets make antisemitism a capital offense as their very first move during the Bolshevik Revolution then start mass slaughtering Christians? Why did Dr. Fauci deny under oath gain of function research multiple times if COVID wasn't an operational strategem?

Start hating your fucking leaders I swear to God you people will never get this shit right under your nose.

If you're going to fap you might as well think at the same time.';

'>>21963992
Jesus I just came from /x/ this is jarring to see here';

'>>21954211
OMG those cant be real. post more if they are. best fucking tits i have ever seen in my life';

'>>21963979
>How does it prevent the spread of COVID-19, you say? It doesn't fucking tell us.
Lol the desperation of the true moron.';

'>>21963992
>Start hating your fucking leaders
Oh I hate them just fine for thein incompetence, not for some schizo bullshit some glowie psyopsnigger in Russia or China dreamed up and fed to retards on here who ate it up because it makes them feel important and interesting in their otherwise dull and retarded lives.
Say... ain't we all supposed to be dead from the dreaded vax by now? Gotta say, it's coming up to 5 years now and we alll seem to be living just fine, more of us than fucking ever. My wife also gave birth just fine, despite being given a vaccine well pregnant.';

'Holy fuck this thread sucks. Bring back the beach butthole thread.';

'>>21964222
do you have more of the right one? what a pair of melons';

'>>21964236';

'>>21964267
i love those melons. plz continue posting those glorious tits';

'>>21964214
The vaccine isn't a fucking nanochip, it isn't some government conspiracy to kill people. It's a rushed gene therapy that likely has more side effects than they're letting on, but like most experimental medications it is likely fine for the majority of people. It should still terrify you that they're trying to hide those side effects, though.

And that's the fucking point, people like you get so caught up in the weeds of forced schizo posts and bullshit misdirection that you glue yourself to one side or the other.

Look at any major event in world history, take Occupy Wall Street. You had PhD's in economics and former finance executives walking the street with real concerns and points to be made. Where did the cameras go? Flat Earthers and smelly hippies. Iraq invasion protests with former Lockheed executives and war generals under Bush senior, whsitleblowers for mossad and the CIA calling a bluff. What did you see? Violent hippies and smelly urbanites.

Stop lumping every conspiracy event into one camp or the other, read between the lines and look into what they're not telling you. Otherwise you're swallowing propaganda like a hot dick.';

'>>21931951
*Women who need bras and to have taken this shot 10 years ago at nudist beach';

'>>21931951
Are they a family or something? The one on the right is nice but the rest arent girls anymore';

'>>21944744
>>21944747
Arent those kind of saggy?';

'>>21953700
Nice, where'd you get this one?';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'I hope once this thread dies we can have another thread about admiring naked women on beaches or in public places generally that isn't >30% arguing about vaccines and politics, regardless of whether I agree with what's being said.';

'>>21952136
>guy simply says he doesn't like tattoos
>call him a faggot not only once but twice
think you might be a bit of poof yourself if you're this obsessed with faggots mate';

'>>21964530
NIce pose and nice piece of ass';

'>>21943912
Young fella, its just a different set of genitals. Its beaten up when it opens up almost fully without her being horny. Pussies are very much like cocks they're fairly robust unless you do something really stupid eg attaching a adult product to a drill.';

'>>21955485
are you retarded?';

'>>21964506
>The one on the right is nice
Yeah, I think she's underage.

>>21964552
This is the thread /s/ deserves/';

'>>21963381
Try to blow out a lighter at arms length away.
Now try it with a mask on.

If you'll note, that like covid, air molecules are smaller then the holes in the mask.
Yet somehow the mask has reduced the distance and speed of the air to the point that you can't blow out a candle.

Since covid doesn't move itself, it has to hitch on the air (and water) out, so if the distance of the air is reduced, so is the distance of the virus riding on it.

It's almost like if you were to combine masking with some kind of minimum social distancing (perhaps double arms length?) It might lower the amount of instances and viral load passing between people?';

'>>21954926
you like what you like homie';

'>>21964267
I didn't know there was a set of them. Link?';