'Aldo will get killed. He doesn't have the power to get Martinez out of there.';

'>>140542782
Never in doubt!';

'>>140547695
is this the /bet/ headquarters in merica?';

'>>140549986
It’s the Peppermill sportsbook in Reno, Nevada. We have probably 100 sportsbooks like that scattered around the country. It’s a nice one for sure';

'Thinking about Inter for a large bet, what bothers me is that they're already champion @1,45
but they don't play anything else so they might as well trash Sassuolo';

'>>140550317
>It’s a nice one for sure
Would be, if you could pour a whiskey or two, smoke a cigar and watch something lounging in there';

'>>140550508
You can do all of that';

'>>140550525
I can't do it because im not in America, but you could do it and think of me while you're doing it';

'is everton like easy money?';

'Any long shots juicy bets going, lads? How about some UFC predictions?';

'>>140552732
yeah';

'now accepting apologies from third orders who lost their soccer bets yesterday and missed out on bruins +2.5 plus pacers ML parlay that I posted';

'>>140553886
when you're saying like bruins or earl grey or some anglo shit like that i have no idea what to look for or what sport that is or where the lines are or where to look for it, i don't understand any of it so i naturally just ignore it and put 5 dollars on everton to win';

'>>140546572
Yeah the H2Hs were probably specific to my bookie so I just threw them out there. Still don't like most of the horses on the inside. Society Man's odds went from 50 to 59 for some reason. And he's ran long disatance races while West Saratoga hasn't but is being bet down. It wouldn't be a bad idea to pivot to his stablemate Dornoch who is from Big Brown and is more experienced. Although I still like him because Mage only ran 3 races too before he won last year. Resilience is who beat Society Man in his last race at Aqueduct and was blazing fast. It's a good trainer jockey combo. He could follow Fierceness on the outside and is the best horse and has good odds. Fierceness speaks for itself. He has the most upside even though some think he's overhyped but you don't want to not have him in a race like this. I saw some tips for Just F Y I in the oaks today so if he places I'll have money to add Dornoch.';

'>>140554060
do they not have search engines in bulgaria?
Why is that when a flag I don’t recognize posts a bet between KfDb and FC United #2764 in the fourth division of the Tartarian league I’m able to find it with ease, but you can’t find literal playoff bets in one of the most popular sports leagues in the world?
Is there a direct correlation between low intelligence and living in the third world?';

'>>140553886
You're lucky auston matthews still had the flu otherwise he would've spotted a dramatic goal to make it 3-1 in the 3rd and you would've been caught down bad by an empty netter. Paying that much for a goal and getting away with it is not really the flex you think it is.';

'>>140554060
Holy fucking based
Soccer bettors are the SOVL of /bet/
Angry yanks can’t compete tbqh';

'>>140554850
>>140553886
stop replying to yourself';

'What’s the biggest /bet/ you’ve ever made, /bet/?

Doesn’t have to be a large amount of money. What was the most significant bet for you personally?';

'>>140554891
Oh wait, kek, it was 2-0 leafs and the bruins had an empty net going. Lucky bastard.';

'>>140554781
$5 on resilience top 5 finish @ +350';

'>>140554891
lmao
faggot got blown out
now everyone is the boogeyman who made him cry';

'>>140554850
keep crying faggot';

'Thank you schizo burger for ruining /bet/. I’m out';

'>>140554836
im the ceo of seo
>Is there a direct correlation between low intelligence and living in the third world?
Well? Feel free to tell us but keep your future posts shorter because I'm barely read this one';

'>posting winning bets ruins /bet/';

'i am going to tail the next posted betslip with a $15 free bet.';

'lens and over 2.5';

'>>140555403';

'>>140555468
i cant use it for horses.';

'>>140555004
Resilience 5th out of 20 seems likely. He's gotta break past Stronghold and ride behind Fierceness don't let up and that's your top 5 right there. You never know how it's going to shake out with a race like this but it's interesting to cap.';

'>>140556500
Come on bro there’s no analysis in the derby. 19-20 horses. It’s pure luck especially with the post position';

'>>140556784
Derby's are rigged with juiced horses and insider betting';

'>>140557324
>insider betting
it's parimutuel bro there's no such thing lol. it's all fixed revenue for the house regardless of which horse wins, places, shows.';

'>>140556784
I wouldn't say it's pure luck. You can be in tune with the entries, look at their strides yourself, and decipher the post positions and if they set up well for the type of runner. It's all depending on what you think and that's what makes it popular because they're all good horses and any drunk auntie who likes a name can win more money than a serious horse bettor. The thing is you can make a solid sports bet and some stupid shit will happen and you'll be even more frustrated so if you go into something with low expectations it feels like a better way to gamble.';

'>>140557663
Final odds of the last 5 winners
>16:1
>81:1
>13:1
>9:1
>66:1
It's pure luck anon. A field of 19 horses makes it almost impossible to come back if a horse gets squeezed at any point. Favorite hasn't won since 2018 and only six top 3 odds horses have won since 2000';

'>>140557874
tbf the 66:1 horse finished 2nd but the 10:1 winner got DQ'd';

'this is precisely why I never bet on a horse to win, only show
or in this case top 5
It’s a total crapshoot';

'>>140557874
I don't disagree with you. That's just racing. For what it's worth I knew Mage would get a good run because he was inbetween slow horses. Two Phil's and Angel of Empire were heavy favorites and got 2nd and 3rd. If you spread your bets out right you can win just like anything else. If you were a total degen and bet the longest shot in 2022 you would've had the biggest rush possible seeing Rich Strike win at the end. I'm betting the favorites this year because I'm not very smart and should know better, but it's what I'm betting this Saturday. Low risk high reward.';

'>>140558270
** to clarify the favorites aren't high reward but maybe I'll win something tonight to put on Society Man to Win';

'>>140557874
Most people don't bet the odds as much as they bet the perceived strength of the horse. The favorite is almost always going to be inflated so you have to get creative if you want to include them in your ticket.';

'UFC picks from last thread >>140538750

Thought about making a few more bets, just not feeling it with this card. Don't care about most the fights and don't see much value. Might sprinkle on Brenner ML at +200. Not sold on Oralbai who is a takedown merchant';

'>>140559163
thoughts on borjas?';

'>>140559655
No opinion. Least interesting fight on the card for me and that includes WMMA';

'>>140518968
Not sure if anybody even saw this but both Sherif and Vacherot won. Vacherot's match got moved to today and he won a close 2-1. Playing Tabilo next. Might be interesting if his odds keep rising but for now I'm staying away. Sorry for the bad Madrid calls but at least the challenger stuff won. Rybakina had an insane choke. Definitely should have won that match but thhat's bound to happen, especially in WTA. Too bad calling line movement correctly doesn't help you if the bet still fails anyway.

For tomorrow I like Safiullin to beat Munar @1.8 and Siniakova to beat Osorio @1.8';

'>>140560008
>2.3 winner
based tennisanon';

'Canucks close out Nashville tonight tbqfh';

'>>140560900
I’m gay';

'Has anyone on here ever posted a winning football bet?
Serious question btw';

'>>140561058
no, only american sports and german tennis anon have posted winners';

'>>140520832
>>140521277
>>140521425
>>140520991
>>140521167
???????
Series is tomorrow and you're on Day 2 of going to your casino to get a slip';

'>>140560900
G1.... 2-4 Canucks
>SOG: 24-21
>Blk shots: 14-11
>PM: 4-8
(nucks win despite being outblocked, outshot, more penalties)
G2.... 4-1 Predators
>SOG: 16-18
>Blk shots: 30-8
>PM: 8-8
(preds win despite being outshot by blocking at an insane rate)
G3.... 2-1 Canucks
>SOG: 12-30
>Blk shots: 28-11
>PM: 14-10
(nucks return the favor with blocking shots and kill penalties)
G4.... 4-3 Canucks
>SOG: 21-30
>Blk shots: 12-10
>PM: 6-6
(nucks score 2 quick goals and win in OT, are getting more effective shots off)
G5.... 2-1 Predators
>SOG: 22-20
>Blk shots: 15-19
>PM: 4-8
(preds take advantage of power play in lowshot game)

I think the Canucks are better on offense and haven't put together a complete game. Game 4 on the road was a big comeback for them and may give them the confidence to attack this game. With Desmith yet to play on the road and everyone going all out in Game 6 I also like the over 5.5.';

'holy shit this is one of the worst cards ever';

'both the women on espn bet took magic -3.5 tonight
so hammer the cavaliers ML while you still can';

'>>140563329
Nah. Definitely lowest name value outside the Apex though in quite some time. The fights aren't bad at all though.';

'>>140563329
Lots of no name Brazilians but the crowd will be so hyped it’ll be a fun card';

'>>140562577
Hope it was a small over 5.5 wager';

'>>140561058
Soccer bets win about 30% which is predictable with bad bettors in a 3-outcome market';

'>>140562437
Why don’t you post your bet to shut him up permanently? Sounds like you’re making the bet either way';

'>>140565903
post one (1) winning soccer bet that anons have posted here';

'>>140566062
this will be first the one.';

'>>140566062
>>136972621';

'Bit worried about the Mariners under 7.5 tonight';

'>>140563778
>utterly BTFO by female bettors
OH NO NO NO';

'>>140560900
Damn that was a scary last 30 seconds';

'>>140566062
looked at previous thread and it appears soccer bets went roughly 2-15 while americans won 60% of bets lol';

'>>140566433
post slip, faggot';

'Big day in horse racing with the gold cup on post ya slips lads and ladettes';

'Does anyone have that whitepaper from the guy that was doing spread betting based on Dallas Cowboys tweets? I think it might have been 2022 but he made VERY good money off of betting against Twitter keywords.';

'AFL wuss bets

GWS Sydney either team by <24.5 @ 1.75. Can’t split them.
Dons beat Coast by at least 3.5 @ 1.60. Harley Reid is back but Dons still dispatch of Coast easily, could have been more greedy.

Looking forward to parlaying these profits into UFC bro’s tips.';

'>>140566954
No, no the dons don't.';

'>>140566809
I don’t bet NBA. It’s the only sport worse than soccer for betting';

'>>140559163
Update: do not bet Brener. He posted a video of a hellish weight cut and he’s facing a guy with relentless takedowns and wrestling. Unless the video was a hoax Brener will be exhausted after one round. You can’t deplete your body that badly and fight for 15 good minutes the next day. Oralbai by sub is worth a look if you can get +400 or shorter.';

'>>140567478
no chance the iggles can pull off a win
up the bombers all the way';

'>>140566954
Hasn’t GWS been killing everyone all year';

'>>140568096
>>140559163
After seeing faceoffs I'm doubling my wager on Klose-Silva FDNGD. Those guys want to hurt each other. Klose knocks him out most likely';

'>>140568096
i think you mean plus 400 or longer for that last bet';

'>>140568446
Wouldn’t go that far. And the pricks got done by 29 points due to a goal in the last few mins. Another bet for MY cats to beat the Dees head to head.';

'>>140572698
what's the 'ti lad?';

'Weird how this general went from a schizophrenic alcoholic Romanian blog posting to an utterly clueless American ranting about soccer bets. That guy makes the Romanian look shrewd.';

'havertz over 0.5 shots on target';

'>>140573412
I just got that too abd it seems like a banker';

'>>140574008
Ever since he was in chelsea i always thought he was a forward but it turns out he's a midfielder, would be odd if he doesn't get a shot on target';

'>>140573223
> utterly clueless American ranting about soccer bets
still have yet to see a winning soccer bet posted with slip';

'>>140565883
it was a typo';

'should bet all my money (1k) on canelo by ko?';

'>>140575303
No he's doing it as a charity event to get the guy more exposure. Should be a nice decision and hug at the end.';

'>>140565917
There's no one to shut up. He left with his tail between his legs. The agreement was I would match his wager because he was so sure about the Nuggets winning.';

'Braves on Sunday';

'What horses are everyone betting on? Catching freedom has har a nice run recently.';

'>>140566954
Based AFL bettor. We’re getting more AFL broadcasts in the states this season. It’s a great sport';

'>>140575303
Canelo doesn’t finish anyone anymore. He’s a pitter patter decisionator now';

'>>140575834
Series didn’t start yet right? You should make a $100 wolves bet to make nuggets anon look like a bitch';

'>>140566756
I feel like the only way to bet football these days is to back/lay goal markets and trade out when it moves to your favour. Margins are pretty shit though.';

'>>140566115
Kek';

'>>140584914
We don’t have betting exchanges here. Wish we did';

'Hey pussy, you still here?
>inb4 “you said you’d bet it Thursday”
Man up faggot. Post your equal wager.';

'>>140575834
>>140586943
OH NO NO NO';

'My AI model suggested ENDLESSLY in the Kentucky Derby. Currently 50/1 with LivescoreBet. e/w terms 1/5 3 places.';

'>>140587736
Don't know shit about horses but I don't understand people who bet the favorite in a 20-horse field. Why are they taking 4/1 odds with 19 other horses lol';

'>>140547695
lets go society man!';

'anons who post slips pregame are the lifeblood of /bet/';

'>>140560008
Siniakova won and Safiullin lost. Underestimated Munar. He's been playing well lately. Also think he will win the final against Tabilo but don't like it enough to bet it.

For tomorrow I like Sherif to beat Siniakova @2.4

Also eyeing Boisson to win 2-0 against Paquet but for some reason I don't see the odds right now. Can someone check what odds you're getting for a 2-0 Boisson win in the Saint-Malo final? I assume it should be around @2';

'>>140586914
Honestly if I couldn’t trade on betfair, I’d have stopped /bet/ting a long time ago. I’m stake restricted or promo banned at most of the normie sportbooks anyway';

'>>140588662';

'>>140589013
2.04 on the exchange, probably be around 2 everywhere else so you're about right';

'>>140590599
Exchange takes 6% of your profits. For 100 @2.04 it'd take 6% of 104
t. pro';

'Wolves schizophrenic has 70 minutes to post his slip.
>will he post it yes/no
>no is 1.2 odds';

'>>140586914
You do have some, but possibly not in your state. Sporttrade for example.';

'>>140590599
Thanks, thought so. Would definitely take it for these odds then.';

'>>140591121
explain to me betting on exchange
What’s the advantage over straight wagers?
The ability to live gauge the odds versus the bookie?';

'>>140589768
I think both of these are incorrect
Wolves/boston comfortably';

'>>140591336
>wolves winning comfortably in denver
make the bet lad. you’d get a huge payout on wolves by 6-10 or 11-15';

'>>140591235
Real, marginless odds. The ability to trade. The ability to set your own odds. Never getting restricted.';

'>wolves coward fails to post slip
imagine my shock';

'>>140589768
based slipchad. good luck friend';

'>>140589556
>>140584914
How do betting exchanges work? Never used one. Are you betting against other users rather than the bookie?';

'>>140592894
>>140591025
>>140587476
>>140586943
You waited until 3 hours before the series starts to post a slip when you said would the day after we made this wager. You are a certified bitch and that is the fakest fucking shit I have ever seen. Nonetheless. May the best sperg win. kys amerischizo';

'>>140555468
Cucked by the 2nd tier jap horse. Grim.';

'Wow. Mauricio Ruffy, that guy is gonna have absurd odds in future fights';

'>>140591336
I think the leafs have grown a lot through this series. Bruins had a lackluster performance in game 6 and they'll play nervous in that building. Sort of like the sixers did at home.';

'>>140590938
Varies, betfair have a basic plan that's 2%, as do Smarkets and Matchbook. Not until you're staking huge or winning really big do you get bumped to 5%.
On Smarkets for example you can stake a million a month or 1500 bets before you get bumped to a higher rate';

'>>140593600
>you are a certified bitch and the fakest shit
sorry bud, didn't feel like driving 35 miles Thursday or Friday just to lock horns with a literal retard. Enjoy Denver in 5';

'>>140594281
>10-1 with 10 KO's and only loss is by KO
Ruffy is a real one. Jiriesque';

'>>140594515
Why are you pretending to be him';

'>>140593591
Essentially yes, you're betting against other people with the exchange making it's profit taking a small cut from the win (usually 2% but can go up if you're a big winner/volume better) but for that you should never be restricted, and the odds will be better on every market.
Betting on horses is a madness with inplay betting and experienced traders can secure big profits no matter who wins. There are so many strategies for trading sports on betfair such as arbing and scalping as well.
You'll get them everywhere in the US eventually, you're just having the boom period for new sportsbooks and eventually with that, people move on to the next thing when the thrill (and welcome bonuses) dries up';

'>>140549008
I am live betting 25 smackers on Minnesota amidst the autism';

'>>140595164
Think I'll wait till tomorrow and have a look at Germananon's tennis tip, maybe look at Rangers to win against Kilmarnock as well. Can't get my head around apehoop betting';

'>>140594941
That sounds similar to what we have with PredictIt but since it's political betting the website got throttled and is almost dead. They're appealing but who knows how that'll turn out. You guys can straight wager politics though which is pretty cool.';

'>>140595522
The amount of shit we can bet on is unreal, Politics, TV shows all sorts of stuff';

'>>140595830
>>140595522
the largest win of my life was betting biden in the 2020 election. they fucked up the odds during election night';

'>>140596144
I was thinking of going all in on Trump for this election but genuinely don't think he can win no matter what. I suppose I could go for him to be the Republican nominee but it's like odds of 1.11';

'>>140596298
I’m not a conspiracy theorist but I tend to agree. No matter what happens he won’t win the White House';

'>>140568096
watched the brener video and bet oralbai. thanks for the tip';

'>>140595164
Money';

'anyone got a live bet i can get my bankroll back with? currently looking at costa rican primero division';

'>>140595164
:kneel:';

'>>140600696

pls';

'>>140600696
>>140601084';

'We hit a parlay.';

'>>140603675
>>140540895
And a dog!';

'>>140587763
If prime Usain Bolt was running against 20 or 200 other people you'd take whatever odds you could get. I know there have been have been horse races in Japan where the odds were 0 to 1 so you're basically betting that your ticket becomes a piece of sports memorabilia you can auction off or frame and hang in your man cave.';

'Permanently fading Steve Erceg from here on out. Zero fight IQ.';

'>>140594471
>Not until you're staking huge or winning really big do you get bumped to 5%
Oh, that explains it';

'>>140600696
You still around? Hope this helps';

'>>140591757
Yeah that range hit.
I’m thinking now it’s time to bet on Denver for the series though once all the casuals get a hard on for wolves';

'/bet/s for today lads, already 1 goal in the Rngers game so hopefully that should come in now - sorry I didn't get the slip posted earlier. Decided to modify Germananon's tennis tip and just go for Bisson to win instead of correct score. Might have a look at Liverpool/Spurs goal markets after this Rangers game as well';

'>>140611540
Damn a soccer bet that hit. I got Rangers ML as part of a penny parlay.';

'>>140611540
What did you do there? Did you accepted bets at 3.45 and 6 for 20$ each? So if Rangers game has 2 goals in it you win 20$, but if it has under 2 goals you have to pay 124.99? And if Bison wins you get 20$, if not you pay 48.99 ? Is this called "laying" the bets as opposed to "backing"? And why are you paying better than all the bookies? Never really understood the exchange markets tbqh';

'just saw that spurs "lineup"
over 4 battering';

'>>140612589
Yes, "selling" the bet in this case means that you are betting against that to happen, so in this case I would want Boisson to win (risking £48.99 to win £20) and over 1.5 goals in the Rangers game (risking £124.97 to win £25)

Not looking good for the Boisson bet though';

'>>140613761
Still think Boisson wins if she holds after this break.';

'Based free bet enjoyer reporting in';

'Timberwolves are +185 for Game 2 lol';

'>>140614872
That is a tempting ML
You don’t think nuggets will bounce back in game 2?';

'>>140613852
Well you were right Germananon, but she definitely made hard work of it. Still take the profit and move on. Happy days.';

'GAMON LEGIA
SCAR SUM FACKIN GOALS';

'gonna quit betting for a bit
so many AFL parlays this weekend that didn't hit thanks to one leg';

'>>140616101
I'm so sorry';

'I don't wanna cause any more suffering. Goodbye /bet/';

'>>140615409
They probably will. Minnesota is such a dynamic team though and they really wore on the Nuggets. I could see them running away with this series. Murray will probably show up for Game 2 though which will be the X factor imo. Jokic look exhausted last game but maybe I'm looking too much into it.';

'>>140618087
Convert to MMA, so much unearthed value';

'I 'knew' this morning 1/3 will lose . Tailed this guy >>140613622 cause always trust people who tip against their own team . I turned profit today. Others (tailing legia) didn't...';

'>>140618087
Tennis and MMA are the answer. Accas/parlays are mug bets and should be disregarded. For team sports I would only ever look at goals/points totals rather than the result.';

'>>140590938
>pro
Why don't you tell everyone the truth about who you really are?';

'That's right. The guy is not even romanian. He's an arab by the real name of Marwan Adbdelkader whose father owns a popular resturant in one of the biggest cities in the country. This asshole never faced any struggle in his life. He plays EAFC24 in his penthouse while pretending to be a succesful sports bettor!! He's a liablity for his family and not a succesful trader. Do not believe his words';

'>>140589013
Siniakova won but it was a decently close match. Was definitely winnable for Sherif so don't regret the bet too much. Boisson won a close 2-1 even though I peddled 2-0 which I couldn't find for whatever reason. Boisson is French so I assume she will get a wildcard for Roland-Garros. Think she can surprise some higher ranked players there who haven't really paid attention to her play because she has been playing ITF/Challenger events.


Some Rome qualification picks for tomorrow:

Vacherot to beat Mayot @1.75

Mpetshi Perricard to beat Barrère @2.6

Vickery to beat Riera @2.1

Over 2.5 sets in Golubic - Ambrosio @2.6';

'page 10 bump';

'>>140630826
Vacherot and Mpetshi Perricard lost 2-0 already so that's a great start. Last minute addition of Kukushkin to beat Garin @3.3 since I think odds have drifted too far in Garin's direction.';

'>>140630355
we know he's a schizophrenic, how did you find out who he is?';

'A few years back this bet was a no-brainer. Today at 33/1 it's a longshot. I did it using a €5 free bet.';

'>everyone I don’t like on the internet is schizophrenic
you have to go back';

'>>140638987
Crazy match. Kukushkin tried to let Garin win it like 10 different times but he was too bad to take advantage of it. Managed to make a 2-1 comeback with 2 really close set wins. Second set shouldn't have even been close since he had a huge lead but he still won anway. Hope anybody saw this in time. Wouldn't have even considered this without the ridiculous odds shift in Garin's favour.';

'>>140639088
you believe that shit? i'm not abdelkader. anyways came here to post that fcsb might throw the game tonight as they are already champions. the two owners are 'friends', they banter each other on the phone after the games, and craiova is in the race for 2nd place. more importantly, they appointed a very good coach like 2 weeks ago, who also happens to be the coach that won the last title with fcsb, 9 years ago. what we know right now is fcsb are not gonna send the first 11, odds already hammered thou. i believe by kick off it could be around 1.60 to 1.30, depending how shit the lineup is; wouldn't be the first time fcsb does this, matter of fact they do it every year. home win now at 1.90';

'Vickery better retire. She's obviously hurt and can barely win a game. Hate when they insist on playing out the match. Going to lose 6-1 6-0';

'>>140646024
Complained too early. She did thankfully retire.';

'Is there ever a point is betting anything shorter than -200?';

'>>140647710
Horses maybe? Especially if you have some sort of inside knowledge.
Otherwise probably not, unless you're a true autist how has a stats based system and keeps spreadsheets';

'Minnesota is now +210 ML
But Gobert is questionable so that's probably why';

'>>140630826
>>140638987
Wins: Over 2.5 sets in Golubic - Ambrosio and Kukushkin win

Losses: Vacherot and Mpetshi Perricard

Push: Vickery (she retired)

Thanks to the Kukushkin win and the Vickery retirement not too bad of a day overall.


More Rome picks for tomorrow:

Albot to beat Müller @2

Sramkova to beat Semenistaja @1.6

Andreeva to win 2-0 against Badosa @2.4

Trevisan to beat Putintseva @2.6';

'>>140643150
Marwan ABDELKADER . Filthy rat. FCSB played the best team, twat. I suppose you're gonna take credit for this "prediction" now, am I right? Hahaha
>>140639088
Trust me. We go way back';

'Earlier this year I bet on Vitesse to relegate directly (17-18) @20
Payout's here baby';

'made a dk horse account for the kentucky derby

now i need some picks for the ponies';

'>>140651321
Based, think I’ll have a look at these in the morning. I really need to get some sleep but trying to profit on the apehoop points spreads';

'>>140647710
You should bet anything you have good reason to believe the true probability is greater than the odds. 1.50 (-200) is only 66.6%, there's no reason to ignore a full 3rd of the probability range.';

'>>140652558
who the fuck is you?';

'PSG to the final @1.60';

'the other finalist @1.50 and winner @2.24 ; there's no doubt this horseshit bayern can't eliminate real';

'>>140648679
Minnesota won 106-80 without Gobert. Hope someone got in on that';

'page 8 bump then bed looms';

'Denver in 5 being a lock looking kind of silly now eh?';

'>>140547806
/bet/ must be under .500 in predictions';

'Just waiting for my wagie payment to come in so i can go back in the rat race
Thia time im feeling confident';

'>>140668637
What's gonna be your new budget?';

'All in PSG to score @1.29';

'>>140673639
Of course you are';

'>>140673943
Not gonna happen with zaire emery and dumbele ofc. I expected that retard would've take them out already';

'>ball hit the post
I never lost a bet in me life. It was all disallowed goals, missed penalties or ball hitting the post';

'"goncalo" ramos? It's that why ronaldo got benched at the wc and they got sent home for it?';

'>>140674335
Its a game of inches';

'Waiting for mavs starting 5 for some props but over 218.5 looks great to me. Dare I say, a lock?';

'My nigga rommy, you're not seriously trusting psg to not shit the bed?';

'>>140661488
You think i randomly got this photo? My vision was barcola causes havoc and brappe scores. Not gon"c"alo ramos. And zaire emery. Thank god kang shit lee isn't playing thou';

'>>140674752
I trusted zaire emery. Who's still playing ffs. Luis enrique the fraud who got eliminated by the moroocans baboons at the wc, piece of shit thinks he's a genius. You won't believe me but i understand football. The first 10 minutes i tweeted dumbele is fucking this game. Barcola kolo muani mbapoe that was the key....';

'Edin terzic is into cuck porn. He will sub in moukoko in the 75th min to equalize the score. Congrats real on winning another CL';

'Cuck porn is in the final. Can you believe that? When you bet dirtmund they put in moukoko';

'>>140674938
Kek who are these people?';

'Last time i betted dirtmund for 400 euros edin "cuck" terzic put in bamba and kept reus on the bench. i used to hate liverpoo now i hare dirtmund the most not to mention they ko'd me in quarter finals out of my eafc24 champions league campaign with porto';

'>>140675035
He's the bum who missed the 6.4 xG chance at 0-0';

'>>140669466
100 dollars
Will try an old method i created that was working but i got too ahead of myself';

'I'm out';

'>>140675889
Dont give up romanian bro no one knew that psg would shit the bed
Also never bet o big leagues and tournaments';

'ABDELKADER HAHAA';

'>>140673639
Mushmania';

'>>140676715
>>140677351
What are you celebrating faggots? 4 crossbars? This is my last post here: 1.000 euros against dirtmund winning the cl';

'>>140673639
the "anti 3D world futballl tips" gonna make fun of us again';

'>>140676124
I lost 200 euros today.. all good. This month on my birthday i'm expecting relatives to donate a bunch and will raise a few thousand dollars bankroll. Yes, it's true. My name is Marwan Al-Bin Abdelkader. I failed betting school. I drink daily. I smoke pot. I lost my virginity having sex with my aunt while my uncle masturbated in the back seat of a mercedes. We're all sick in the head. But nothing is gonna stop me from raising a MONSTER bankroll and drop it on whoever qualifies to the final (proably real) to beat dirtmund and multiply by
.. 30% (1.30 odds). Dirtmund will not win the final. If they do, log in here. You're gonna see a post of me cock and balls choped off';

'>>140674702
I too think there will be a lot of points';

'>>140677419
Thanks. Will probably throw some money on Dortmund';

'>>140651321
Rough day. Only Sramkova won. Everything else failed miserably. Surprised about that Badosa result in particular. Seems less bothered by the recent back injury than I thought she would be.


Picks for tomorrow:

Over 2.5 sets in Mensik - Hanfmann @2.2

Potapova to beat Wang @1.55

Over 2.5 sets in Carle - Siegemund @2.3';

'page 10 bump';

'page 1 dump';

'guys. I got a hot tip about a sure thing. I'll tell you guys in a little while.';

'>>140685837
Still waiting he will surely deliver';

'>>140685837
The sun will rise tomorrow (maybe)';

'>american tells to not bet on aoccer and bet o first world bets
>bet on the german prediction
>lose in the first game
Wow';

'>>140689752

keep betting soccer then favela ape';

'>>140691286
I will loser';

'>>140689752
>german
>first world
retard hue';

'>>140689752
If someone doesn't post a slip you can be sure it's a loser';

'i'm going to be betting a draw in the champions league game today, is there any reason I shouldn't bet the enhanced odds on 365 considering early payout isn't an option anyway?';

'>>140694209
How can it end in a draw if the aggregate is 2-2 and its the 2nd leg? Does going into penalties count as a draw?';

'>>140694280
>american education';

'>>140694302
It's a 90 minute line thing? Then the ref is going to add 8 minutes add time because no one wants to wait for penalties. If i had money left id bet Bayern 3.8';

'There are some rain delays in Rome. Last year had insane rain delays as well. Rain will probably slow down in the later rounds but something to watch out for with less experienced players who aren't as used to the rain interrupting the flow of the game. I think the rain delay helped Siegemund to make a comeback in the second set. Now they're going into the third one.';

'>>140694369
There is no way real will lose this they got the refs on their side';

'Sun in taurus moon in taurus. Tuchel Mars in taurus +, sun, moon, mercury trine Taurus +
Vinicius Saturn conjuct moon opposing ascendant -
Bellingham mars conjuct Saturn -, Jupiter square Taurus -, moon sextile sun +
Ancelotti sun conjunct moon +, natal midheaven, natal mercury sextile mercury +';

'Astrology favors real because kane and muller charts don't line up. Also ascendant is Scorpio which is good for villains. Also like the under 3.';

'>>140695400
and some strong mind have those motherfuckers.';

'What the fuck did i told you? Naaah tuchel, the faggot who fucked us over and over this season, does yoga and eats salads is gonna qualify over real? It's not porto who is the most reliable team in the world. It's real madrid. Or should i say reliable madrid? Tuchel took out kane for jumbo moting. Neuer is a homosexual (who dropped the soap). What i say is fucking true. PSG hit the post 4 times last night. That's how my predictions lose. Won back what i lost yesterday. Good night';

'>>140661675
>>140703445
retard';

'>>140695400
>>140701534
Btw is bokita a good bet?';

'>>140703611
Huh?';

'>>140703631
Today I have Sao Paulo for a little bit better odds and a little bit more reliable IMO.';

'>>140703701
You said a double negative but he couldn't read other context clues because he's schizophrenic.';

'>>140703854
Will tail. Cheers';

'>>140703954
Esl...';

'It's fucking annoying when someone roots against your bets. When i post here i imagine it helps somebody with an opinion or sth, not that some asshole across the ocean is hoping the prediction losses with 4 crossbars just for the sake of it';

'If i'm not here remember to bet on ukraine to beat us at the euros . At 2.30 it's value af too. Should be 1.60 (according to my model : correct score 0-3)';

'>>140678363
1-1 so far with the over 2.5 sets, let's see if Potapova can win tomorrow after the rain delay. Maybe it even calms down Brazil >>140689752


For tomorrow:

Coric to beat Draper @2.2

Over 2.5 sets in Seyboth Wild - Barrère @2.3';

'Atalanta qfs tomorrow @1.39 speaking of which. Got this from a marseille fan. Not that anyone would follow for these 'low' odds. Said 2-0 correct score';

'Ameriguns who don't live in /bet/ states how do I stop being a retard and /bet/? I don't want to drive to Illinois just to lose money.';

'Bros.... I present to you the best good beat in the history of the world from a long time degenerate gambler

1/2';

'>>140710613
3 goals from 89th minute and 4 from the 82nd to cover lmao';

'>>140703954
>everyone I don’t like is schizophrenic
you gotta go back';

'>>140707469
Bovada. Download Exodus and buy coins from whatever exchange and wash them through your Exodus wallet before depositing and withdrawing. I made $1m+ of bets without an issue. I fucked up and didn't wash my coins once and got banned but if you pass it through a private wallet there's no issue. Its also 100% legit unlike some weird crypto casino';

'Fury : Usyk 1:1 odds

hmmmmmmmmmmm

Fury got his shit beat out by Ngannou, but this time all the belts are on the linee....';

'>>140710733
Based, thanks anon.';

'Hated UFC 301 for betting but still made 4 bets like a dummy. Will do better this week. Should be a fun main card.

UFC Fight Night 5/11

>Buckley-Ruziboev under 1.5 rounds
Gonna be a finish either way, I'd be surprised if this makes it past halfway

>Menifield +220 vs Ulberg
Ulberg is a lot more polished on the feet and longer. I think Menifield's wrestling gives him a chance to win. Worth a play at 3.2 odds.

>Rebecki-Ferreira under 2.5
Rebecki is too big a favorite so I'll take the under. I think he finishes CDF, probably by KO. CDF is old and has been KO'd twice in his last 3 fights. This might be his last UFC fight.

>Woodson -200 vs Caceres
Both long and rangy strikers. I like Woodson to control distance and land more to win a decision

>Despaigne wins ITD -175
I don't think Despaigne is capable of winning a decision. If it gets out of the first round he's probably fucked. Most likely he heems Waldo quick. Despaigne's opponents never survive the first round.

>Hooper +120 vs Borschev
Chase's grappling is the difference. He's looked good at 155. If he can avoid getting slept by Slava Claus he'll have enough control time to win by decision, or maybe grab a choke for a submission

>McKinney +135 vs Ribovics
This fight is a coin flip so i'll take the underdog. McKinney has great power and a glass jaw. Ribovics is tough but very hittable. I think T-Wrecks can put him to sleep. Also betting under 1.5 rounds -275 for a consolation prize if Ribovics drops him immediately

>Parlay of Despaigne u1,5, Ribovics FDNGD, Ruziboev FDNGD, and Lewis FDNGD
All of these are heems. Should pay around -110';

'>>140705251
Adding a dumb longshot:

Alexandrova to beat Sasnovich 2-1 @4

Usually never bother with correct score predictions like that but trying it here because I get the impression that a 2-0 win is too obvious.';

'>>140718383
>Alexandrova won 1 single game
Amazing longshot. At least Potapova won. You there, Brazil?';

'Never tried this in my life, whats a good website/app to bet for Poland? Or are these sites from ads in UK and USA worldwide?';

'>>140719731
Doesnt matter now cause i made a parlay with the 3 games. I lost my other bet money because of one goal now i need to wait until day 20 so i can get payed again';

'>>140720626
Looks like you have superbet. It's the best. You can download the phone app too, works really fast';

'>>140721415
Please stop doing parlays. I'm not saying this to be condescending. I genuinelly mean it. It's usually not worth it especially with high odds legs to begin with.';

'>>140722438
Since we're both in this general for a few years now, curious what's your progress been so far? What's your bankroll right now and how much are you wagering on these games? You seem like a balanced guy, i doubt you lose control and chase losses very often. Are you flat staking? Do you still not make live bets? Cashout/ hedge when you're in front? Overall are you net profit?';

'>>140722654
Any time of short-term progress I make I often ended up destroying with overly greedy bets and longshots. Also had a rough stretch in late 2023/early 2024 but think I'm doing better now. I have tried staying away from livebets but I still occassionally get baited (generally don't share them however). I don't ever really cashout, no. Rarely hedge if I feel like the player I bet against might make a comeback but that's only really something for bigger bets.';

'>>140547695
>UFC 301
>Kentucky Derby
Wait a minute, this stuff happened last weekend!';

'>>140723015
Alright. Also, does your government charges you a 5% tax for each win or is that fake news? Or what's the tax for deposits/ withdrawls?';

'>>140723272
In Germany there's a 5% government tax on every bet placed, yes. Think it's been that way since 2012.';

'>>140724412
Jesus christ';

'I’m not having fun anymore
bets for this feel?';

'Nadal @2.3 against Hurkacz looks interesting. Given his current form it makes sens but it's still slow clay. Only thing that worries me is that the the damp courts might hinder movement. Nadal at + odds on clay against someone like Hurkacz would have been unthinkable even 2 years ago. Going to keep an eye on the line movement. If he becomes even more of an underdog I definitely think it's worth going for.';

'>>140705251
Both lost. Coric was terrible. Just gave up after the first set.


For tomorrow:

Over 2.5 sets in Shevchenko - Khachanov @2.6

Rybakina to win 2-0 against Begu @1.4

Ostapenko to beat Potapova @1.65';

'>>140728904
If Nadal can't handle Hurkacz in a round 2 at Rome he might as well not show up to RG. Hubie is a guy you can gameplan against and nadal can utilize his skillsets to beat. It might even be the match nadal needs to believe he can win again too.';

'>>140731583
Think you could have made similar arguments for someone like De Minaur who just beat him recently. To be fair Nadal won the rematch but his performances haven't really been that inspiring. Got pretty much hit off the court by Lehecka too. Obviously different playstyles from someone like Hurkacz but still. Didn't look too great against Bergs either from what I've seen. Might just be attritubed to trying to find his footing in his first match in Rome and not wanting to waste too much energy in the first round against a lesser opponent but definitely not a good sign.

As I already mentioned I think the court conditions will be a key factor. If it's still relatively damp by the time they play I assume this will help Hurkacz who still be able to rely on his serve anyway and isn't exactly the greatest mover. Might just end up going with Nadal anyway at these odds because I can't shake the feeling that he will up his level. You might be right about needing that win to believe for RG. Still got some time to consider so I'll see how the odds look like.';

'>>140725127
Drink a beer
Gambling sober sucks';

'>>140732295
It's not a must win for Nadal. He could still be on track and chalk it up to an unlucky draw because Hurkacz is a hell of a player. This wasn't always the case as Hubie was always RO16 cannon fodder for the big 3 in the end of their runs. I'm surprised they haven't played each other yet. But watching the Bergs match it looks like Nadal is still a step behind in his legs relying on his racket too much. Hard to say who the damp conditions will favor. Could hubie just serve him out of the building? I think so they. We had 20 years to profit off Nadal these odds are like morsels and scraps just to have the name on a ticket I mean Federer fizzled out abruptly as well. Not saying the 2.25 is wrong its probably about right.';

'hello /bet/

I have a 15-fold accumulator, £5 staked, returns £3000. The first 8 legs came in last weekend. The second 7 legs are all tomorrow night. They're all straight selections, just "to win", so it doesn't matter about method of victory. Which one/ones of these fighters do you think I should hedge against, so I can guarantee myself a healthy profit?

Hardy, McKinney, Woodson, Rebecki, Ulberg, Ruziboev, Lewis';

'>>140741584
Post your slip';

'>>140739184
I see Nadal @2 now. Probably not worth it anymore.';

'>>140741584
If you're asking which one to bet against, then McKinney is a glass cannon and one of the most vulnerable.
Next tier would be Hardy. Hardy very inconsistent and WMMA is greasy.
Ulberg - good striker but gassy and Menifield can crack, gets better with each fight and looked great against Jacoby who has less athleticism but an even sharper tougher striker.
Ruziboev - Ruziboev has talent but against higher level competition there's not much to look at, Buckley is very underrated imo. If the fight stretches on that favors Buckley big time I think, especially if he drags it to the ground. But Ruziboev is dangerous.
Woodson- Looks lights out sometimes and other times real pedestrian, I don't think Caceres has the power to give him trouble but is very tricky and well rounded enough to present a challenge.
Lewis- always a question mark but I think he's way above Nascimento even on a bad day.
Rebecki - has looked like an animal so far, I think he may just bulldoze through the more weathered Ferreira, but Ferreira is always a live dog, think Rebecki's strength and pace is too much.';

'kike garcia to score';

'>>140725127
correa/nicolas to win at even money';

'>>140742309
will do when I'm at home

>>140743238
thanks lad, good breakdowns. Here's what I'm thinking for each of them
>Hardy
I think she's made big improvements, and from the sounds of things (which may just be bullshit of course) she's been putting in massive amounts of training. I think she's going to look her career best tomorrow. I think she might surprise everyone and actually finish Aldrich, although I'm expecting more a dominant decision
>McKinney
this is the one of the ones I'm shitting the most. I just couldn't pass him up as an underdog against Ribovics, who I don't think is very good. Ribovics got controlled easily on the ground by guys who are equal or even inferior to McKinney on the ground (in my opinion). And Ribovics does seem to leave his chin there for the taking when striking. However, like you say, McKinney has looked glass cannon esque before. I think McKinney gets beat by say... Ludovit Klein, Rebecki, Thiago Moises, Orolbai. Maybe even Drakkar Klose or Haqparast. But I don't think Ribovics is at their level, nor do I think he looks like he is going to get to their level. So I do think McKinney either chins him early, or drops him and then chokes him to a tap. Still nervous though
>Woodson
I really like Sean Woodson, he's so janky looking with his movement and striking, but effective. Must be a nightmare to fight. But I like Caceres for his unorthodox style too. However, I do think this is a relatively good match up for Woodson, and I think he gets a unanimous decision victory, 29-28.';

'>>140743238
>>140743730
>Rebecki
absolute beast, I'm not worried at all with him, and I think he finishes Ferreira long before the third round starts
>Ulberg
smart, powerful, slick enough for Menifield. For me, Jacoby lost his fight against Menifield by being dumb and hubristic. I just don't see Ulberg making the same mistakes. However, Menifield has big power so that does make me nervous. But Ulberg is a guy I believe in, and I'm choosing to believe that it's true about his last fight - that he was half injured, that the day before he could barely walk, and that's why it took him until the 3rd round to finish Jung
>Ruziboev
I think he's a stone cold killer and a level above Buckley. Although Buckley does have some explosivity and he is in his home town. I'd be backing Buckley against an average fighter, but I think Ruziboev is a bit special. I can see him finishing Buckley like he did Bruno Ferreira. Catch a kick and counter into face, clean. I can also see a club and sub for Ruziboev. However, as this is the second to last fight, IF the bet is still on at this point, I think a healthy hedge on Buckley is the smart play
>Lewis
Black Beast by KO, rounds 1 or 2. My second least worrisome fight after Rebecki. Nascimento went life and death with Dantale Mays. He's getting slept, and won't know what's happening while Derrick Lewis humps the floor with his tongue out.

Thanks for reading my blog.';

'>>140741584
For your sake, I hope you win bro, I'll throw a cheeky couple of dollars on it though but parlays are definitely the bookies treasure trove';

'>>140744479
thanks man. The more I think about it, the more I think if the bet is still on by Ulberg v Menifield, I'm going to put some money on Menifield to guard against his power';

'>>140745201
We all hope you win';

'Drank 7 beers before my first night shift at the new job as a security guard at an abandoned factory. Yes, my family's rich but i gotta raise [more] funds for real madrid to lift the trophy against borussia dortmund @1.33 (which i correctly forecasted at 1.30 a day before the second semifinal). There's another dude on the night shift, should i bring booze? I heard in this field drinking on the job is seen as a virtue';

'>>140743238
> Ulberg - good striker but gassy';

'Todays the day. Final day of the regular KKD season, winner-takes-all Groningen vs Roda JC. It's kino. My bet's Roda or Draw but frankly todays fixture is too beautiful to be mingled with and marred by worldly financial concerns. Enjoy the sport for what it is. Don't bet.
Betting against FC Eindhoven though...
>>140710733
my man said bet with Bofadese LMAOOO';

'>>140742309
slip is here

>>140745478
thanks brother';

'>>140748169
>fraction odds';

'>>140742942
Yeah that line dipped like crazy';

'>bet on willem 2 when they were down 0-2 vs Telstar';

'>til double ball roulette is a thing
>picking a number for both balls to land in is 1300/1
>€5 on 20
>both balls land in 14
>14 next to 20
>mfw';

'I need one more goal in the nice - le havre game to win 100€';

'get the fuck out of here. luckiest piece of shits of all time. How is this even possible?';

'>>140730326
Rybakina withdrew so that's a push. Ostapenko won 2-0 and Shevchenko couldn't win a set.


Next picks:

Under 2.5 sets in Arnaldi - Jarry @1.65

Struff to win the first set against Tsitsipas @2.4

Kasatkina to beat Osaka @1.8


>>140749771
Not going for anything here. Might keep an eye on it live.';

'Pacers win the 2nd half @$1.62 is free money';

'Awful week with MMA. My life on GWS to beat Essendon by at least 7.5 points. Wish me luck.';

'I’m going overs for souths/dragons nrl
I can imagine both teams scoring heaps';

'Celtic to win and +1.5 match goals @2.2 is THE /bet/ for the early kickoffs lads. Rangers have not won there in 6 years and this is essentially the title decider. Neither team will want to lose but Rangers have to win so they will be open at the back even moreso than usual. BTTS is also a viable option if you’re doing a builder or some shit.
>t. Scottish Premiership watcher and enjoyer';

'>>140763820
I also forgot to mention that both Goldson (100% out this game) and Balogun probably won’t play so it will be 2nd string CB’s for Rangers';

'>>140763612
Well that was wrong but I’m going underdog sharks to beat melb because whishart is a disaster';

'>>140763820
Scottish Premiership anon…I kneel';

'nothing fucking works for me. I will quit betting for good. bookies purposely give you shit odds so you have to parlay to get some returns';

'>>140769526
Well yeah otherwise bookies would be brankrupt';

'>>140769723
>Tottenham losing at home
>West Ham losing at home
>Leipzing losing at home
>Newcastle losing at home
>bet on over 0.5 at half-time and the game ends in 0-0 draw
Honestly this shit only ruins my saturdays';

'ufc bets and parlays?
i need some schizo bet that wins half a million with 50 cents';

'>>140763820';

'>>140763878
>>140763820
>posts an actual reasoned football bet that isn't odds on
>actually wins
>even the added extra tip wins
You're not welcome in here anon, we only post losing tips here';

'>>140769526
Just pick one game and split your stakes as the game goes on according to what's actually happening. You'll never win doing parlays and small profits are better than losses. Even if you're making 5-10% on your initial stakes, traders would be more than happy with this.
Simple as';

'>dodged a late bet on sevilla
>>140763820
based';

'>>140769779
>>bet on over 0.5 at half-time and the game ends in 0-0 draw
>had 1000 euros on leipzig to score agaisnt mainz
>this piece of shit misses a 1 v 1 with the goalkepper
>scores in each of the next 6 games
Every goal is just turning the knife in the wound at this point. Ironic thou that all the teams you mentioned equalized or won the game, you probably made bank today';

'>>140753244
2 out of 3 winners. Jarry won 2-0 even though he should have lost the second set and Struff won the first set. Kasatkina was awful. I feel like an idiot going for her but my desire to fade Osaka on clay was too strong. Need to be more careful with that. Also managed to also avoid the Nadal at + odds trap thankfully. Hurkacz dominated. Rough look for RG. Nadal definitely on fadewatch there even if I think he'll do a little better than in Rome.

Most likely going to share some stuff for tomorrow later.';

'>>140750987
Is it you T4TW?';

'>>140772317
I didn't. Newcastle fucked up and some shitters from slovakia also lost against the bottom scrappers. I'm also triggered today because I'm this anon >>140752056';

'WHERE IS HORSE RACING ANON I NEED TIPS';

'>>140776241
>horse racing tips
The biggest tip I can give you is not to bet horses anon. If you insist on doing them, I’d pick horses to lose and lay them instead of trying to pick winners. Historical data tells us that favourites only win approx 33% of the time (UK meetings anyway) so stay away from them.
Also, where are the UFC tips pls';

'>>140777418
>>140743750
>>140743730
>>140743238
>>140741584
>>140715393
it's a big night';

'>>140777418
Just because you're clearly clueless about horse racing doesn't mean they're bad. They're one of the best things to trade on. And a 33% win rate for the favourites is a meanineless stat without context of odds.';

'>>140778313
I literally said it’s better to trade and pick losers anon, not sure why you are so salty. Picking winners on the horses is a crapshoot and anyone who reads anything into form or luck is probably a mug';

'>>140779105
Laying horses is not what trading is and whether you're laying a horse or backing a horse, if you're doing it randomly, you'll end up in the same position in the long run in an efficient market. One isn't better than the other. No other sports betting market moves as much pre-event as horses which is why it's so big. You're disregarding it because you do not understand it like I said.';

'>>140779354
I’m not disregarding anything, if you’re a good trader then fair play to you, but I’m pretty sure the anon looking for horse tips was just looking for winners to pick, which isn’t a good strategy as I’m sure you’ll agree';

'>>140777418
we had a britsh expert on horses. He also had the best writing style I've seen on /sp.
Too bad my bookie doesn't offer horses.';

'>>140775713
Korda to beat Fritz @2.4

Mertens to beat Begu @1.55

Garcia to win the first set against Collins @2.7

I'm also eyeing over 0.5 tiebreaks in Djokovic - Tabilo but don't like the odds enough. Don't quite like 3.4 enough. If by some off-chance the tiebreak odds rise I'll consider it.';

'>>140779354
>Laying horses
hot, I need to lay me some horse pussy';

'>>140779725
there’s also a Brit whose interest in horses is merely a guise to have casual gay sex with french jockeys';

'>>140776241
Derbys are rigged anyways, unless your a friend of a friend of the owner or a monster, you won't make proper bank with it';

'>>140715393
>Also betting under 1.5 rounds -275 for a consolation prize if Ribovics drops him immediately
Glad I made that bet. twrecks has negative chin';

'>>140748169
Good effort. Hope you hedged on Ribovics';

'>>140777418
>where are UFC tips
i made a 1000 word UFC post ITT lad';

'>>140782245
Thanks fren, I couldn’t find it amongst gay jockey fanfic and Romania posting';

'After almost 2 years I've finally made more money than I had lost';

'Damn Rebecki fraud checked hard. Look good early. Cashed out every parlay I could hard during that 2nd round. Borgata is super generous with cash outs. Least I hedged with a cheeky two fiddy';

'>>140785730
Ferreira was like +425 or some shit a couple days ago. Missed out on insane value';

'>>140715393
Got my ass kicked tonight. I'll try harder next event.';

'>>140785730
Rebecki's eyes were fucked. He gassed hard but no way he had more than 50% vision the last couple rounds';

'Good news
Taiwan steel is playing another donkey goal scoring team.
2+ FHG @$2.10
Easy way to double ur money';

'Also titans are going to wreck cowboys in nrl in an hr. It’s such a good underdog league atm I’m already counting my winnings';

'>>140791959
Ez as fucking sin';

'>>140791959
>>140792025
nicely done';

'the time has come... you guys have arrived at the end of a 4 year subscription to "Hunch®: analysis and rants" the magazine that i've had the honour the host here at /bet/ ; i'll be departing in a few days, never to return to this shithole again, so hopefully the gay french jockeys will manage to take the vacant spot for the group's blog for the time being. will try to post my farewell tips in a short moment';

'Ciro Immobile to score a penalty in the Lazio - Empoli game starting in 50 bings';

'computer loading more tips';

'>Brøndby - FC Copenhavn dnb 2 @1.67
pressure on the home side in 1st place. copenhagen in need of 3 pts to regain the pole. the model had them as big favourites to defend the title at the start of the season, would be crazy if they actually pull it off and the model is correct again. i mean they're riding a good momentum (last 3 games 3 consecutive wins) and brøndby has started to slip a few games ago. model recommends dnb (set in coward mode). as always will probably be a good idea to keep an eye on it and bet live on them to score at ... 1.34';

'Hartberg - Salzburg @1.47
title's already kinda gone (not mathematically) and best 4 players are missing but if they don't win here...

Istra - Hajduk Shit @1.70
perisic, kalinic etc. clearly better team. i can understand why the model favours them to win this game at 64%';

'last tip is a penalty in the porto derby tonight. boavista is a team of dumb butchers, and porto creates a lot at home with [potential] dives in the box. ... 2.35 ... model recommended it at ~3.00...

honorable mentions:
mbappe last game on parc de princes . 1.45 to score . 2+ @3.10 , 3+ @9.00 , to score a penalty etc . to score live odds increase!
karagumruk - galatasaray @1.45

atalanta - as roma
roma over 0.5 @1.40

independiente - bolivar X2 @1.40

atl. madrid @1.40 - celta vigo

partizan @1.41 - mladost

nec nijmegen - feyenoord @1.70

manure - arsenal @1.45';

'fade all gypsy soccer bets
he only wishes to steal your money';

'>>140794120
>>140794505
>min 25 immobile dives
>penalty check
never forget';

'>>140795392
All due respect a potential penalty check isn't a penalty gypsybro';

'>>140795534
who's gypsy? do i look like taking plastic bottles out of the trash to recycle them for 10 cents a piece? i was once again robbed by the refs. WE WERE robbed by the refs. make no mistake, these things come around. the prediction won. marking it a win';

'just woke up, my 5$ bonus cashed';

'>>140795623
>>140795534
So, what's the "copper wire" of football bets?';

'>>140796096
you know that feeling when it's 0-0 in the 60th min and you 'know' the favourites are gonna score? (1.40 on red star over 0.5 in 60' in pic related). that's betting. it's why i know i'll never "quit" as long as i'm following the results. play it simple (on another goal). don't look for anything to bet, let the games come to you. and when you MUST bet it's when you unload. but in the meantime you have to keep yourself occupied. so then the formula is described as such: "bet small and med until a special stake arrives". you bet 10, 20 dollars on the wins pregame, and 100, 200 on them to score when you feel the goal is inevitable';

'>>140796415
but every time bayern, olympiakos games ended 0-0 i've lost 1000 € (euros) so it can backfire. however 2k € on patetico to score at home against rayo vallecano @1.30 . that's +600€ and it lands in first half . and then maybe another bet for 200 at 1.33 ; betting is all about the momentum . if you win and feel good you protect your bankroll, if you lose you chase losses. it's what i learned playing fifa online
>don't tilt when you lose
if you are able to not lose your shit when you're behind you'll be able to make a comeback
which brings it back to that other theory: "betting is comebacks". when the favourites are behind you take them to score. most games aren't decided early. sometimes the favourites make a comeback. sure, you can take them to win prematch. but you're not fortune telling. what if they conceide in the first 10 minutes? then instead of having 1000 on the win prematch, you have 100 on the win, and put 1000 on them to score over 1.5 (in case it ends 2-2... ) . does it make sense? am i insane? i made bank like this. my iq is [only] of 116. maybe i'm missing sth';

'for example. djokobitch @1.08 prematch (unappealing)
1.42 live
not watching the game. just a hint for better odds on live comebacks';

'finishing my 9th beer before going to the factory for my shift. last night sleeping on the job had a nightmare. me phone ringed and in a very calm, evil voice the guy told me they know i'm sleeping. found out it was ... thomas tuchel . knew there was something wrong with him. can't trust people who don't eat meat. like this guy on youtube. travels to ukraine, goes to a restaurant says he can't eat burgers at 12 am, orders a salad saying he "really felt the need for a salad". reminds of me cousin. never drinks more than 1 beer (on his birthday). my problem is once i go past 3 beers i can't stop until ...11';

'>>140794248
NOW copenhagen over 0.5 @1.47 min 31'
A L L I N';

'undefined';

'>>140780332
Absolutely terrible picks, Jesus Christ. No clue what happened with Mertens in particular. Think it's a sign I need to take a small break.

One thing I will say though is I'm fairly certain Khachanov will beat Tabilo on Tuesday. Tabilo just got a surprise win over Djokovic and he looks like he can't even believe it in interviews. Usually when that happens the player can't even focus on his next match and Khachanov is fairly consistent when he's not facing one-handed backhanders. He's @1.5 right which I think are pretty good odds given the circumstances. Have a couple of other leans and observations but nothing I'm particularly confident enough to share.';

'My one regret this season is not having bet on Leverkusen more often';

'Mbop goal or even brace. Last home game of season, dude's leaving and everything seems lined up for it to be his night';

'don’t bet on soccer';

'>>140810879
dont tell me what to do';

'West Ham - Liverpool
3,75 West Ham
4,43 Nihil
1,70 Liverpool

what are your bets guys ?';

'>>140812224
Um, they are not playing?';

'Theoretical trustfundstick parlay for next weekend. Mostly like Virginia and Notre Dame. Originally thought Maryland could cover +3.5 after smacking Princeton but Duke looks to be cliqueing as well.';

'>>140820998
*clicking. I don't know why I said cliqueing Duke doesn't have a great history when they clique up.';

'before the games
> ok, minimum bid. if I somehow win it's good
after the games
> daaaymn, why didn't I bet at least five times more?

every time';

'>>140821249
That shit will drive you mad just keep stacking victories';

'I've been following this thread since inception and I have won a grand total of fuck all, how could this happen to me';

'>>140821249
you should be fighting the russians instead of wasting your money betting on kickyball matches';

'rune + medvedev parlay at plus odds THIS CAN'T LOSE';

'Starting to think Ostapenko might win Rome if she makes it past the next round.';

'>>140827988
If Svitolina actually ends up beating Sabalenka I would immediately take the opening line for Ostapenko.';

'>>140832689
Sabalenka actually ended up winning but it was really close. Think she had some problem with her back. Ostapenko @3 is a bit higher than I expected. Think it looks good if the back is still a problem by then.';

'Hey anons, im the chilean hentai coomer who was betting to get money for commissions.
To any of you who still bet on soccer, what do you think madrid will do tomorrow? They play at home against alaves, but they already won the league, so they dont have any reason to win.
Im also thinking of doing a combined bet of madrid and girona winning their respective games (@2.3) but im not entirely sure.';

'don’t bet on soccer';

'>>140836806
What other sports are good to bet on?
It took me months to get enough knowledge about football clubs and players (never really cared about the sport before betting, outside of the world cup) so it would be hard for me to learn an entirely new sport with new teams and players';

'>Turd Esports @1.38
Surprised the chinese league finalists are ~1.40 against G2. I imagined it to be a no contest at 1.08
>Sharta Prague @1.33
Not playing the worst team in the league, but with a win at home and 4 games to go they can take a huge step towards defending the title
>Manchester Shitty @1.36
I think this is THE bet today. Can't miss the 3 pts with 2 games left
>River Shite @1.37
Probably a stomping. 3-0, 3-1, 4-0, 4-1. In control of the ball and plenty of attacking power';

'Odds 3.41 for Mr. Poo's quadruple';

'>>140803996
tailing ur cacanov pick';

'>>140840604
Bad start by Top. No rooting interest but im watching this.';

'>>140843109
well it's best of 5 so it's no stress. i just rebacked at 1.95';

'it's over';

'>>140843204
Thats gotta hurt i see you usually bet on G2 then you fall for the Chinese high IQ myth';

'That's gotta be the most dominate LoL match in esports history';

'>>140843483
>>140843769
well that was embarassing';

'>>140843883
Top had em lined up in game 3 just couldn't execute the ambushes i actually think they gave T1/Liquid a blueprint to go off because G2 should've lost game 3. Basically G2 will be a popular choice but the value is on the other team.';

'>go from losing soccer bets
>to losing ESPORTS bets
third worlders will never learn
don’t bet on soccer
don’t bet on esports
don’t listen to third world era, especially gypsies';

'>>140844348
>>go from losing soccer bets
>>to losing ESPORTS bets
actually audibly kek'd

>>140843976
>T1/Liquid
so T1';

'>>140844548
Presumably T1 but who's going to bet a match like that?';

'>>140844945
you can bet on the maps if you get like 1.20';

'germany anon absolutely getting smoked on his tennis calls lately';

'>guy comes into my shop and drops a £3500 HT/FT on a Gambian relegation race match
You'd think somebody would make it less obvious when the fix is in';

'>>140845962
and then everyone clapped';

'>>140845176
>fairly confident Khachanov wins
Yeah, fairly confident I'm a fucking idiot. Done saying anything more about Rome now. Going to take a look at smaller tournaments leading up to RG. I still think Ostapenko has a decent shot to win Rome but she's probably just losing to Sabalenka in two quick sets now that I've said this.';

'>>140845979
You'd be surprised how often this happens in brick and mortar. Recent ones I've had are on semipro Indian football and Estonian 2nd tier. They usually stick to a couple hundred spread across multiple slips, sometimes throw in some losers around the fix to make it look more legitimate. On the small scale people who get tips for fixes are terrible at it.';

'>>140846012
if there’s one thing I know happened, it’s definitely this';

'>>140846041
If you ever end up with the misfortune of working in any major chain of british bookies you'll have your mind blown by the audacious shit some people try to pull off.';

'>>140845962
Why not go to a different shop and back it yourself';

'>>140845962

so which game is it cunt';

'>>140836642
I got under 3.5. It had decent odds.';

'>>140844348
Do you actually think posting the same thing 10 times every thread is contributing??
Post a bet or stfu you annoying cunt';

'someone kneecap haaland for me cheers';

'>>140850162
just making sure anons don’t waste their money betting on soccer';

'>>140844348
>literally a 50/50% to win a DotA bet unlike any soccer bet
?';

'>nil-all at half-time
GET IN
GET FUCKING IN';

'>88'
>1-0
fuck off fuck a 33% ROI or 4:1 or whatever the fuck i just want to fuck some legal jap schoolgirls iykwim haha';

'wtf nigra fuck this rigged bull shit';

'don’t bet on soccer';

'Just placed my first ever bet bros';

'i got my bet365 account restricted for winning too much money i can take my money but i cannot bet, they told me i should call them to fix the situation let's see';

'Pacers are good value today, I don’t see why nyk are favourite. I’ll be taking the ML';

'bet365 caitlin clark 20+ points and 3+ threes at +140 that’s a no brainer';

'>>140858178
Bro kek';

'>>140859111
strong second half coming for her i know it';

'>>140859284
Kek wow from the jaws';

'>>140861394
told you it was a no brainer';

'Tyson Fury @1.90';

'>>140868700
Lol, I came here because I just saw Usyk @1.80 and it looked good, but I dont know much about boxing';

'Ludogorets to win the cup @2.05 -400
Ludogorets over 1.5 @1.36 - 1000';

'I’m betting on rags and hurricanes to go over 5.5 goals tonight';

'>>140868958
>>140868700
The gypsy constantly gets bets wrong
I’m now extremely confident in usyk to win purely based on the gypsy tip';

'>>140868958
>>140878541
Usyk is ukrainian. I know guys like usyk. I also know guys like tyson fury. A friend from childhood, nicknamed the barbarian (in close circles), biggest guy, built exactly like fury, not quite as big, also kind and funny on the outside, but transformed when fighting. He was the only guy i wouldn't wanna face in a fight. Big long arms, just like fury's. Not big biceps, but hitting those arms feel like having steel in it. Could never get past that guard. Tyson fury has 99 strength, AND fight iq. Size + punch combinations. It's gonna be nothing like the ngannou fight. Usyk has speed. And technique. But not size
And ALSO
Also dropping his famous catchprase "i feel. I very feel" , changing it to "i feel good" to the cute presenter and everyone watching's dissapoinment
And the fact that he got dropped by the black french dude in the last fight, gotta mentione that. With a body shot. A straight "illegal" bodyshot. Or was it illegal? Joshua was finished. Good for him he's never facing fury. That was never a contest. How many rounds do you think will take fury to stop jake paul? And what i mean is going in his face, throwing hammers to his face. Like 13 seconds? Yeah
Speaking of which, does Mike Tyson finally finish jake paul? Odds 3.00
All the mma guys. The college wrestler that can't throw a punch, the black lives matter wrestler tyrone woodley, then two other memes in the legend and hall of famer anderson silva, and the oher hall of famer nate diaz. And his brother making a full of mayweather. First draw. First fight not won. All for "got your hat." . Can 60 year stoner mike tyson get back his demons? What means he's 60? 60 year old people still got power. AND more than the zoomer millenial generation. The legend mike tyson is not gonna ko the youtuber disney star jake paul? Odds 3.00, or is he gonna show up out of shape, gas mid fight and get knocked out of existence?
Usyk can't ko fury. @1.90 is mad value. I'd be expecting it to be around 1.44';

'I’m betting on the stars to win and I’m also betting the score will stay under 6.5 desu';

'>>140881196
And the odds for tyson Fury went down to 1.80 as soon as you wrote these trve nvkes (im betting on Usyk @2.00 btw)';

'>>140878541
some other romanian said he's a mentally ill person and some kind ayyrab sandcoon, probably dysgenic pusslim retard which is very common among them due to inbreeding
Won't be surprised';

'>>140843976
>G2 will be a popular choice but the value is on the other team
Would have never imagined T1 would get @1.65 against G2. Crazy good value here. For reference in the game they played last week odds were 1.16 ; strange, but seriously don't bet this if you hate value';

'PAOK can win another title (with the romanian manager nicknamed the general they won a few years ago) with a win at Aris, the other team from Thessaloniki, that can be very bad at times. they didn't thought they had any chance but AEK slipped, so now just gotta rally to troops one last time and not choke a fantastic season. Seems most books have them at 1.68 right now, others like betano still caught off guard at 1.78 . Unibet as greedy bastards as always the lowest at 1.55 ; odds will drop to 1.50 or less 100% as away win will be a public choice';

'>>140889336
Yes, i'm afraid everything the other romanian has posted about me is true';

'>>140889719
So it seems, you're doing nothing to disprove it but everything you do falls directly in line with what he said.';

'Didn't know there was a general for this >>140889435';

'>>140889483
T1 looked in control the whole time vs TL. That Faker guy they have holding down the resource thing in the back is an elite korean player. Not knowing much about it all I thought G2 was the best team just because they were a big team but TES turned out to be a joke and they took advantage, but T1 won't make the same mistakes. Except for this guy named Oner who kept dying but still T1 all the way here.';

'>>140889764
There is but it's pretty dead. How did you decide on the sizing? Seems like a lot to me.';

'>>140889888
It's definitely the most I've ever bet. Originally I was planning on 100k with a lot of confidence but the more I looked at the odds the more I couldn't believe it and felt like I was looking at an easy comeup. I could afford the loss of course and would make it back with interest by the end of the year, meanwhile the pay-out was bonkers. I'm definitely benefited by the fact that I've never lost a bet so I was riding the high a little bit. But I never lose because I don't sit around like some of these dweebs in here tossing pennies at all sorts of shit they don't understand so they can feel like they earned their gas station cigars.';

'>>140889833
>That Faker guy
You mean the GOAT? Well T1 won the worlds last year. G2 has been the best team in europe for many years now, and are capable to pull out meme wins against anyone, but here they're like river plate against real madrid';

'i also fancy
atletico madrid @1.45 win at home against osasuna (10/10)
>mlada boleslav - sparta praga @1.45 away win. can win the title with 3 pts here before the last round (7/10)
feyenoord 6-1 against excelsior . last home game and no pressure against pure undistilled npc trash excelsior. to be a contest of who scores more goals : feyenoord , or PSV against waalwijk. both visiting teams in the relegation battle. i'm saying psv 5-0
>tonight: napredak - red star belgrade 0-4 . red star over 1.5 goals @1.36 (10/10)
al nassr - al hilal . overs . like over 5.5 @6.00
>rio ave - benfica 2 @1.35 (7/10)
sporting - chaves
gyokeres to score @1.40 (future best striker in europe) (9/10) but low odds...
>galata - fener overs and cards . i'd say btts @1.47 . probably ends like 3-2 for either side

currently in the hunch phase. to be continued';

'>>140889979
>Both teams 1.90 with money coming in on home team Rangers
>Astros make 3 runs at last second and win by 1
>Astros now 1.78 at home as previous years champions
>Bet $15 on them
>get BTFO by underdog team after unlikely comeback win the game before
G2 is the Astros getting nostalgia bets. T1 is the Rangers being undervalued because of opponent. It's the exact same thing.';

'For the first time I actually had a dream about a sporting event I have a bet on
I dreamed that usyk dominated fury from the opening bell and did everything but knock him out.';

'>>140896124
Interesting. I'm all into that weird shit. Sometimes if you really want to know something you can ask the universe before you go to bed and get some answers.';

'For me its Bari - Ternana over 2.5 @2.20';

'>>140881196
>Usyk can't KO Fury
Why not? Fury has been badly cut, hurt, and knocked down several times in his career';

'>>140896732
checking that match.
>first playoff match
I'm skeptic of the +2.5 tho.';

'>>140898890
Already missed a penalty...';

'nuggets hanging around even odds';

'Another shit card. I should take this off after 2 bad events in a row, however I'm a degenerate so here we go.

UFC Fight Night Saturday 5/18

>Yanez vs Salvador over 1.5 -150
Salvador is a weird fighter. Durable, wild, a bit sloppy. I'm not high on Yanez due to a questionable chin, I just don't think Salvador is the guy to find Yanez's chin. I think this likely goes the distance.

>Pinheiro wins by split/majority decision +750
Small play on a meme bet. Angela Hill is an expert at losing close decisions and she's almost 40 now. Toss a cheeky fiver on this.

>Nolan vs Martinez under 1.5 -175
Most likely Nolan finishes Martinez quickly. I'm not quite buying the hype on Nolan enough to lay -500 ML or -225 ITD. Either way someone gets finished early

>Demopoulos +300 vs Ducote
Demopoulos already has a couple robbery wins on her record. In WMMA when it's likely to go to a decision with no damage landed I love betting the underdog.

>Abus -275 over Alves
Big favorite, comfortable laying it here though. Alves is 5 years past his prime and has lost to almost everyone who can throw hands. Also taking Abus by KO/TKO at -110

>Harris +110 over Williams
Carlston Harris is sneaky good. His only UFC loss was to Shavkat. He was getting controlled by Wells but found a way to win. He's crafty and durable and I think has more paths to victory than Khaos.

>Murphy -140 vs Barboza
IMO there's about a 35% chance Murphy gets gatekept, so I'll take the -140 odds on the younger, undefeated favorite. Significant step up in competition for Murphy. Barboza is old though, 38 with a lot of miles. Barboza gets hurt in every fight now and he hasn't won 3 in a row since 16-17. I think his 2-fight win streak ends Saturday.';

'>>140902816
NBA wants a game 7. Only had one in the first round. Minnesota will win tonight.';

'wtf don’t bookies watch Belgian women’s soccer? This shit is a fucking lock.
Rip in pieces bookie cuntss';