'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'This website still has tiny filesize limits so have a sample';

'undefined';

'>>2824965
Here's your pic without that weird filter.';

'>>2824963
Only wolf better than Liru';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'While this thread isn't going anywhere.
What is better on or off model and why?
I say on model because then the character looks how they should adn cannot be mistaken easly for another.';

'>>2832081
/e/ is always slow dont worry about it.
for me its on model, but it can somewhat deviate.';

'Holo is the most beautiful and hottest wolf girl in all anime.

I feel like I'm in a harem with these images';

'>>2832081
i like on model too, because it gives legitimacy to the drawing sort off
like off model fan art is nice, but its a bit like deepfakes irl, its jarring
if i want a different bodytype or age, there are other characters for that';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>2832141
>Holo is the most beautiful
Yes.
>hottest
No. That would be Liru. >>>/h/7512033
Holo is for marrying and lovemaking and holding. Liru is for dating and fucking and howling.';

'>>2832825
wait a minute. hear me out. how about both in a threesome? ehh? that be something.';

'>>2832993
>how about both in a threesome?
hmm
yes
i could definitely get behind that idea';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>2832081
Ugh, personally, I really hate it when people go WAY too far off model. Like, say, if the character is a loli, but then they draw them like a tall, curvy, busty woman. At that point it's like "do you even like the original character"?
... I said "like" a lot lmao';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>2827983';

'undefined';

'I never watched the anime. Should I?';

'>>2837693
yes';

'>>2837693
>Should I?
Absolutely
Also there's a remake coming out this year
Hopefully they continue farther in the LNs';

'>>2837693
it's more /biz/ than /e/ but yeah

>>2837742
>Hopefully they continue farther in the LNs
if they don't get to Myuri I'll demand my money back';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>2832081
On-model, I DESPISE hack artists turning slim, supple girls into fat bitches with cowtits.';

'>>2840205
I have a name for that. I call it the trailer park version. When fan artists downgrade the character from the original model to something that looks lumpy and trashy.
I think the worst part is when they put a completely generic face on the girl and whipe out all of her personality.';

'>>2840374
Those kinds of "artists" 100% deserve to be driven out of business by AI.';

'>>2840767
It's already happening';

'Anyone know when the new series is supposed to appear?';

'>>2842257
April';

'>>2842295
Thanks!';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'AI allowed in these threads?';

'>>2850782';

'>>2850782
>>2850800
No.';

'>>2850782
I hope someone with enough of the same autism I have but more drive and knowledge trains these models specifically on skirt lifting, because they all look so bad in every pic I've seen
the entire rest of the image can be perfect but the fabrics of a lifted skirt, shirt, etc always look fucked and it kills the whole image for me

used to get the same peeves in video games and was the number 1 reason I learned blender and papyrus to mod cloth physics into skyrim SE, shit just bugs me so fuckin much

thanks for reading my cloth rant';

'>>2850896
Sounds like you have the perfect amount of autism and drive. All you need is a handful of okay images to train something and a GPU that has a minimum of 12GB vram. If you want to make it very robust, your training set would need to be fairly large. Say 5 images for each scenario.

Skirt length
Camera angle
With underwear
No underwear
Bush
Bald
Weight

Say 5k images total with random combinations of the variables above if you want a very robust skirt model. Or 20 images if you want something quick that gives you the idea someone is lifting their skirt but don't care if it gives you the same angle and skirt every time.';

'>>2850782
If only it actually looked like her at all.';

'>>2824963
Is it furry if she isn't fully a fox?';

'>>2850908
i don't have a GPU with 12gb of ram nor do I really have the skills to do any of that
>>2851968
*taps the sign*';

'>>2851968
she isnt a fox you fucking faggot';

'undefined';

'>>2853232
stay in your containment thread';

'undefined';

'I for one am enjoying the new Korbo.';

'undefined';

'undefined';