'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>449656';

'>>449658';

'>>449659
No more, O musical maidens with voices ravishing-sweet!
My limbs fail:—Ah that I were but a ceryl borne on the wing
Over the bloom of the wave amid fair young halcyons fleet,
With a careless heart untroubled, the sea-blue bird of the Spring![';

'undefined';

'Hands down.';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>449652
very sweet';

'I like marmosets, I lift dumbbells.';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>449649';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'Sorry if too risque';

'>>449713
This anon gets it.';

'>>449649';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>449649
Sorry to burst in here, but does anyone have those pajeet poo in the server room pics?';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>449649
Fairly new to the whole AI art scene. What do you generally use if you want to recreate from an image? Shit like Bing won't recognize the character I prompt it for.';

'>>449649
>AI
>from an artistic viewpoint
Not for another 5 years';

'undefined';

'>>449924
Look at this thread...with very few exceptions the images were clearly prompted by people with ZERO imagination, who wouldn't dare step outside of the box.

It's like if someone created a machine that could make any type of food and/or meal imaginable without any need to understand cooking or food science, and when people got ahold of it they told it to make "steak and potatoes" or "a burger, fries and a milk shake" or "really crispy fried chicken".

The only chefs who would be threatened would be the ones who couldn't already make those things well.
Meanwhile, real chefs who struggle to create compelling new dishes that are both unique and satisfying would be happy as pigs in shit for such a tool that lets them simply imagine things that have never existed and can have them executed with little need for direction.

This has already happened with music composition and recording, btw...machines exist that can create any combination of sounds and rhythms imaginable, in ways that humans simply can't match for technical difficulty, speed, endurance, etc.

Accessing them is cheap and easy, its revolutionary...and the vast majority of what is produced using them is boring AF- totally derivative, trendy, hopelessly unimaginative and predictable and trite.

People also complain that all of the above = "soulless" music but what they miss is that it's not the equipment that makes it that way, its the thoroughly talentless and unimaginative people prompting it to make that dreck.

AI art can't supply imagination or the desire and bravery to create one's own standard that goes outside the lines and breaks rules and doesn't just ape what already exists....that's why it can't create art by itself. But in the hands of a true artist it can absolutely make art.';

'>>449824
good morning sir';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>449824
Sir kindly redeem pictures and revert with closing ticket

Survindarajanahashameshejeet V.
+91 6969 420420
Chief Senior Technical Engineer
Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India';

'>>450094
Who fed the AI pictures of poos shitting?';

'india just can't recover from these';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>449649';

'>>449649
>>450148';

'undefined';

'ignore this post.

>Typical fight with an anon.
>Anon says something
>I reply
>And tells me i am an idiot
>I reply
>Anon calls me a name fag
>I lose.
>Anon wins and here's a medal.';

'>>449649';

'>>449649
(2)';

'undefined';

'>>449653
The weird hands actually work well here';

'>>449649';

'anons, is it possible to upload an image to GPT 4, and have it make variations of it?';

'undefined';

'>>449987
agree with u 100% u articulate ur thoughts very well';

'>>449987
To put it short, if you don't have anything to tell no amount of tools will help you.';

'undefined';

'>>449759
keked';

'>>450071
>>450072
>>450073
>>450074
>>450075
>>450076
>>450077
>>450078
>>450079
>>450080

prompt?';

'undefined';

'>>450897
This is glorious';

'>>450421
more like this please';

'I feel like I missed something, was there a recent incident involving Indians shitting indoors at a tech establishment?';

'undefined';

'The beverage from the heavens';

'The falklands war in the style of wallace and gromit';

'How would you define the "AI art aesthetic"? What makes these images so easy to clock as AI, even at thumbnail sizes?';

'>>450950
it's a great question. I've been thinking about the same thing recently. Beyond the trivial and obvious (fingers, fringes, certain recurring textures, escher nonsence), the thing that immediately pops out to me is the impeccable framing, styling, and shot composition - it's like these things have become so fantastic at composing a subject/background etc that "good framing" alone now makes an image look AI-generated. Not to mention that many people include such adjectives in their prompts (perfect shot, great framing, fantastic composition, etc) or such adjectives are baked into the model tweaking (bing AI, midjourney, etc)

I forget what it was, but I recently saw a well composed photograph, and I immediately thought it was AI-generated (it was not)';

'>>450950
They look like overwrought youtube thumbnails but without having any of the signs of a manmade shoop';

'undefined';

'>>450995
that whore told me she wouldn't send it to anyone!';

'>>450948
kek';

'I like proboscis monkeys.';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>450970
The quality of the technique being emulated also factors in; the number of people who had the skills to do photorealistic airbrush illustrations was always limited and that further limited subject matter so that you simply didn't see many "unserious" or surrealistic images made to that impeccable level of skill.

When you did it was often sort of a "fuck you" to people who would judge what subject matter was "worthy" of that treatment and dismiss the efforts of people with skills up the ass as "not art" because it didn't play by their rules.

Those same gatekeepers are the ones pissing and moaning about AI now because of that ability to say "fuck you" has been spread to the masses, and because so many of their "rules" were predictable formulas that are the antithesis of creativity and imagination have been thoroughly exposed as such by making dumb machines that can replicate their favored output.

Now they are rushing to create the illusion that they value human artists and are their saviors, when it's those same gatekeepers who have always created and manned the roadblocks that prevent living artists from making a living making art.

It's the visual art equivalent of how technology allowed artists to break free from the stranglehold of movie studios and record labels that not only controlled the means of production but also publicizing the work of real artists who wouldn't subjugate themselves to their systems. Those people didn't give a shit about "art" amd the people who want to make it and get paid, and neither do the people crying about AI and the fate of professional artists and designers.

Pretending that they care is pure marketing.';

'>>450950
its not an "aesthetic". sure the average anon can tell de3 slop is AI, but those who are in the know do not need to see the bad hands, perfect framing, styling, incomprehensible details, etc. to tell a given image is AI. once you understand how the image is generated, its simple.';

'>>450083
>microoft';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'seems someone is literally shitting this board with Microsoft Meme Generator de3

I personally think square images are not very good for aesthetic images. Also you need software that allows a finer control of composition and art style.';

'1';

'2';

'3';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>449650
That guy looks exactly like my late grandfather. Creepy as fuck.';

'>>450394';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'/pol/ made some good pitbull ones.

Remember, kids, it's not the breed, it's the owners.
Euthanize pitmommies and their widdul dindu doggs too.';

'>>451786';

'>>451786
>>451787
BTW:

Threadly reminder that you can feed shitbulls 0.5g per kg of body weight of xylitol and most will drop dead in a few days. Median weight 30kg shitbull, 15g of xylitol. "XL Bully" 90kg "shitbull mix", 45g of xylitol.

Xylitol is a sugar substitute that is safe for humans (and also kitties!) but lethal to dogs. It is widely available in granular form in health-food stores. (IOW, no, you don't need to feed the dog ten packs of chewing gum.) Just mix it into a doggie treat like sausage or cheese balls.

Xylitol has two separate modes of lethality in dogs: first, the chance of putting the dog into a hypoglycemic coma (within hours), second, liver failure (within days). The above doses are the LD50 (meaning half will die from it) to cause liver failure; the hypoglycemic coma dosage is only 20% of the above. There is no antidote, but it can be treated if caught early, and only about half of dogs will die from a LD50 dose (by definition). The two different modes make it very likely to kill a dog with this dose.

Avoid getting caught on video or making it obvious that you're the prime suspect by complaining constantly ahead of time.

Good way to rid your neighborhood of dangerous dogs.

Common counter-suggestions and why they aren't as good:
>just shoot it!
* obvious intent
* police investigate gunshot wounds/deaths
* dangerous to bystanders in suburban or urban neighborhoods
* unless the dog is actually attacking you or someone else, this will get you criminally charged if caught

>antifreeze!
* takes literally 3X the dosage to reach LD50
* now has bitterants added to stop children and animals from drinking it
* weird options like boiling hotdogs in it makes your intent obvious

>rat poison or other poisons!
* obvious intent
* can be fatal to children or other animals you don't want to harm
* much more recognizable and hence treatable by a vet
* some "rat poison" products are just warfarin, which only works because rats often fight and bleed out';

'>>451786
>>451787
>>451788';

'>>451787
ouch';

'>>451786
>>451787
>>451788
>>451789
Dogs in general are the niggers of the animal kingdom.';

'>>449987
On the contrary, some of the bizarre outputs I've gotten from AI have been quite novel and thought provoking -- specifically because it doesn't think like a human.';

'>>451809
did you even read their post?';

'Lol... Old hardware folks.... What are they doing with server rooms full of a100's? This is amateur work compaired to the reality they simulate for you';

'A100's and you don't know what's real....';

'undefined';

'Real vs fake... None of you know what's going on 'backend'';

'>>449941
Underrated';

'>>450896
"Indian call centre"';

'undefined';

'>>449649';

'>>450099
shits hilarious';

'>>451797
Strong disagree. Pitbulls are shitbulls. They're something like 6% of the overall dog population but are over 50% of attacks on humans, both fatal and nonfatal. I support pitbull extermination.

Other breeds are overwhelmingly less dangerous and range from fun and cuddly to useful and helpful.

I particularly like golden retrievers; I used to think they were really dumb dogs, but then had a houseshare where one of the other people had one. Smart dog, highly trainable, very friendly and just wanted to be loved.';

'undefined';

'>>451062
>>451063
A MAN IS POSTING SPICY MEMES IN LEGO CITY';

'>>451897
>They're something like 6% of the overall dog population but are over 50% of attacks on humans

This is actually even worse than human nigs (13%). Why are pitbulls not outright banned?';

'I have a lot of favorites but I guess I'll pick this one.';

'>>449649';

'>>452053';

'>>449768
it is great but fur makes it awful. Can't enjoy';

'>>450071
>>450072
>>450073
>>450074
>>450075
>>450079

literally every men's rights base';

'>>449987
>This has already happened with music composition and recording, btw...machines exist that can create any combination of sounds and rhythms imaginable, in ways that humans simply can't match for technical difficulty, speed, endurance, etc.

Suno.ai is the cream of the crop, the #1 music generating AI, and its.. Shit.

Granted, I haven't checked for a MONTH, but really? Something much better has come and I missed it?';

'>>452435
>Something much better has come and I missed it?

Wasn't talking about AI, just basic synths and sequencers, arpeggiators, effects, DAWs, etc.

Also sounds like you missed the entire next sentence-

>Accessing them is cheap and easy, its revolutionary...and the vast majority of what is produced using them is boring AF- totally derivative, trendy, hopelessly unimaginative and predictable and trite.

Can't imagine anyone thinking that was a positive review. But the point still stands-

>People also complain that all of the above = "soulless" music but what they miss is that it's not the equipment that makes it that way, its the thoroughly talentless and unimaginative people prompting it to make that dreck.

"Prompting" in this context simply means giving that equipment the minimal commands needed to set up rythyms and melodic patterns, etc. that can be made to regenerate and morph into content that is divorced from someone directly choosing each note or element or interval.

Someone with the smarts to know what's worth keeping and building on can do amazing things with gear like that, just like real artists can do cool stuff with AI art creation tools...but most people aren't like that and just choose whatever prompts and output best mimics something they've been conditioned to think is "good", without knowing why.

That's not very creative, but it's the user's fault, not the fact that any particular machine was involved.';

'undefined';

'>>449987
based,
well said';

'>>450071
Is that a bethesda office?';

'>>450083
lmao';

'>>449655
cool';

'>>450081
What model & prompt are you using to create such beautiful art? I envy your talent';

'>>451725
Darkwood be like';

'My Japanese girl version of a Tom boy. What do you think?';

'>>451192
Can you do family guy?';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>449987
>People also complain that all of the above = "soulless" music but what they miss is that it's not the equipment that makes it that way, its the thoroughly talentless and unimaginative people prompting it to make that dreck.
i agree. the democratization of something creative lowers the output quality.';

'>>452919
hrm.

I'd add 'on average'.
I don't think the very peak to be lowering as well. but it gets harder and harder to navigate the increasingly huge ocean of creations.

look at youtube for example. the amount of good content probably constantly grew!
but the amount of shit just even more so...';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'>>453154
I don't believe you.';

'>>453162
believe what';

'tfw you realize this entire shitty thread is just an excuse for OP to share their scat fetish...

Prompt: close up of a woman screaming in terror in the style of a rococo fine art piece';

'>>449649
This is actually the best I have seen. I would advice he Monetize the picture on his website via Hydro online without reliance on ads.';

'>>453257
jeets really shit up everywhere they go';

'>>450948
masterful.';

'>>449987
>It's like if someone created a machine that could make any type of food and/or meal imaginable without any need to understand cooking or food science, and when people got ahold of it they told it to make "steak and potatoes"
A more apt analogy would be that it can make whatever food manual but requires you to input ingredients in a speacific order, and obviously most people don't have the willpower and time for that shit. It's not really an imagination problem issue as much as it's not easy putting it into words that an ai can understand.

>People also complain that all of the above = "soulless" music but what they miss is that it's not the equipment that makes it that way, its the thoroughly talentless and unimaginative people prompting it to make that dreck.
They use it for memes, and it just shows that art is no longer about an individuals expression of their ideas but something that encompasses themes. A single art piece can no longer be taken by itself as just an individuals expression, a gestalt which threads together the larger context that it engages with and that it is defined by aswell that it also defines. It's become more phenomenal oriented, the era of individualistic art is long been gone. I would say this socialization (ironic) begin with mass-produced propaganda art in 20s-40s Soviet Union, pic related Malivich, who was also the last to make a novel individual contribution to art, pioneered its socialization.';

'>>449649';

'>>453181
Probably that that is made with AI';

'>>453865
imagine circumcising an astartes, sweet emperor';

'>>449649
I just typed in smashing pumpkins lyrics
> the world is a vampire, secret destroyer sent to drain';

'>>453870
> DESPITE ALL MY RAGE I AM STILL JUST A RAT IN A CAGE';

'>>453874
> but can you fake it for one more show';

'saving the scene girl from all the horrors in the world';

'I made this and it sucks but I kind of like it.';

'>>450948
That's fucking fantastic dude';

'>>451064
who the fuck re you even talking about?

>>450950
not sure you really can at thumbnail scale
but the defining characteristic is really the amount of fuckups - they arent trivial - they are the difference between actual image coherence and images that fall apart. in a sense everything they get correct is really the superficial. the images are recognizable by looking like prompts (x if it were y) and by looking derivative and covered in highly refined bad photoshop without knowing what any of the parts (of any thing) are and how they go. its literally just image mashing and it looks like really highly refined bad photoshoping of a prompt. some times it works out ok though. theres a lot of wiggle room for what is acceptable for the eye and the mind';

'>>454044
>who the fuck re you even talking about?

If you can't figure it out from what was written, there's no point in trying to explain it...you're either just not capable of understanding it and your opinion doesn't matter, or you're one of those dishonest wannabe gatekeepers who live to shit all over things they don't like or understand and your opinion doesn’t matter.';

'AI has/will commoditize image generation for sure -- any monkey can type in a prompt for a "fast car" and shove it in a PPT deck.

But humans are still the only source for human creativity.

As a designers, the way we leverage the tools now is not just to grind out a million more generic Midjourney/OpenAI/Stable Diffusion images and call it a day, but to use those to replace stock images we'd typically spend hours searching for and then hack a million ways until we achieved the desired result.

That means, getting proficient with AI so you can add it into your Illustrator/Photoshop/whatever workflow.';

'>>454090
I'd expect this. Same way you know that someone has used ChatGPT to write an entire letter to you - bloody patronising and impersonal.
But if the writer uses ChatGPT to get a few lines, ideas or tweaks to his letter, that's just a nudge to make it slightly better.';

'>>450995
>gee, bill, 2 wieners?';

'>>453865
>BABY PENIS BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD';

'>>449649
Scary how AI can do realistic photos and videos now';

'>>451812
Dude says AI is a crutch and only spawns mediocrity. Other dude counters and says AI can come up with novel images because it's inherently not human. Seems pretty straightforward to me.';

'>>454090
>But humans are still the only source for human creativity.
And we're starting to realize the human component just isn't necessary.';

'>>449669
Very nice. Hi from /pol/';

'>>449987
As someone who's already made $400 this year selling my A.I. artwork, I am bullish about making it my career before decade's end. I am improving daily and querying with local art museums about an exhibit.';

'>>450948
Can do you Holohoax in this style?';

'>>454458
You're delulu; why would someone pay you to write text in a search box when they themselves can do that just as easily?';

'I didn't know this board existed and this is the first thread i checked
Good';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';

'undefined';