'>>7135220
Yes. Sculpting and performance art.';

'>>7135220
AI killed art just like 3d printing killed sculpting';

'>>7135230
but 3d printing is only good for little toys, I'm talking about real sculptures made of clay/wood/stone/metal

there's no bronze or alabaster 3d printer (yet)';

'>>7135234
no, not a home use one anyway. Some robot arms can sculpt with some precision though.';

'>>7135239
yes but even in your photo its a human controlling the robot and making the decisions. Applying LLMs to sculpting doesn't work, there's something about going to 3d space that messes up with the algorithm and it gives random garbage. They are trying though.';

'>>7135241
>its a human controlling the robot and making the decisions
"The software takes a 3D model and automatically generates an optimised workflow and tool paths without requiring human intervention. It then simulates the process internally to identify any potential issues before sending the instructions to the robotic chisel."';

'>>7135241
you are a bit behind. text to 3d AI came out last year, it's still crap, but a bit of a leap over what you have in your pic rel.
https://lumalabs.ai/genie?one=62a92557-2a90-4ab6-8883-09c47036632f&view=one&metalness=0&roughness=0.95&color=255%2C255%2C255';

'>>7135234
You can use 3d prints to cast with though';

'>>7135244';

'>>7135246
These look pretty decent, also AI generated?';

'>>7135243
again all these systems are not fully autonomous, you need humans to verify everything and to watch it in case something goes wrong. Most of the models it is trained on are CAD engineering models. Maybe if they had 10,000 chinese artists churn out thousands of cad models of italian sculptures then they might be able to make a general AI for sculpting, but that hasn't happened yet.';

'>>7135248
https://lumalabs.ai/genie?view=create
Yeah. It's at this link. you get a lowres one in a few seconds, and then you choose highres and it gives it to you in a few minutes(maybe more on the server load)';

'>>7135246
that picture must have been some of their best models, the one it gave me looks like crap';

'>>7135249
2d generative ai isn't fully autonomous either and needs a human to identify if something went wrong too, you're coping';

'>>7135249
Sure, you need humans to supervise. sculptors though? probably not. I'm not for this tech, just aware of it btw. recently sketchfab was scrapped so I think we will see more of this generative stuff pop up with higher quality.';

'>>7135251
click "make hi-res" on the right. might take 10 minutes. (am generating one now and it's taking awhile...)';

'Bad hand traced /ic style anime will make a big come back. Venture cap should get on this now.';

'finally. well uh... face is busted. but the chest and back look ok.';

'It's different this time.';

'>>7135262
for me it made the face and wings more detailed, the output is not yet at "artist" level yet, maybe in the future.';

'and looking at it from different angles you can see that it didnt get the nose shape right even though it looks good from front view, side view it's fucked.';

'>>7135272
>>7135273
just pay a sculptor $20 to fix the nose and hands';

'>>7135273
maybe next year...

>tumorwiiks';

'>>7135230
>AI killed art just like 3d printing killed sculpting
3d printing killed sculpting just like digital painting killed traditional painting (kek)';

'>>7135220
possibly ai is going to take over half of the jobs in art and every other field by the next 20 or 30 years but people are blowing this out of proportions, you job is gonna be safe for decades if you are a decent artist with some inventiveness';

'>>7135282
>t. never worked as an artist
nobody pays you for skill and inventiveness';

'Ai is about to plateau and stagnate for like a decade or more, technological innovation is slow as fuck in the real world even if redditors think otherwise.
how much more advanced/usable/game changing has the internet become in the past 10 years?
Vr/ar?
3d printing?
Vocal assistants?
Smartphones?
Computer graphics?
Streaming services?
Cloud services?


The only exceptions that come to my mind are TikTok and AirPods lel.

Nothing. Ever. Changes.';

'>>7135294
are you retarded? half of those have advanced by leaps and bounds without plateauing and I only say half because I have no fucking idea what would even constitute advancement for streaming and cloud services';

'>>7135299
r/singularity is that way fag';

'>>7135299
I think you may be retarded if you think any of those things changed significantly especially in their adoption';

'>>7135307
>t. newfag
you weren't here before smartphone proliferation';

'>>7135307
>streaming and smartphones didn't significantly change their adoption
You have to be 18 to post here.';

'>>7135299
Maybe if you live in the third world';

'>>7135315
>>7135317
Literally pooposters
Lmao
iPhones screens grew larger wow!';

'>>7135321
>talk about adoption
>muh screens
Refer to >>7135317';

'>>7135323
Refer to >>7135302';

'>>7135318
>>7135321
Found the zoomer.';

'>>7135325
>resorting to posting data
Didn’t read.
Also, if something grew in adoption it’s just because now every pajeet has an iPhone.';

'I accept your concession, zoomie';

'>>7135325
So? Over half of the population had a phone even 10 years ago. Just like I said.
You proved yourself as a faggot.';

'>>7135334
>In line with the overall growth of the smartphone market worldwide, thesmartphone penetration ratein the United States has continuously risen over the past several years, reaching around 92 percent in 2023
zoomzoom';

'>>7135351
Modern phones are "Party Identification" devices.';

'>>7135220
Sculpture or AI?
Can't they hook up a 3d printer to Stable Diffusion? Then you could do both';

'>>7135504
no it doesn't work, when you try to do diffusion in 3d the usual algorithm fails because for dimension 3 and higher there are too many paths to take when you diffuse a particle. There's a theorem in probability for random walks, in 1d and 2d the chance of returning to the start is 100% but in 3d it is ~34%. This is why random algorithms are hard to optimize in 3d.';

'>>7135723
>in 3d it is ~34%.
So, just run it three times.';

'>>7135321
>iPhones screens grew larger wow!
i mean camera tech did undergo an arms race. instagram filters were an early stopgap to make smartphone pics palatable but have since grown irrelevant.

CPU efficiency (mostly because of mobile) and GPUs have also increased tremendously in the last decade. I'm a die hard nothing ever happens guy though not even trying to argue that AI is reaching diminishing returns.';

'>>7135985
>[AI ...] diminishing returns.
AI hits plateaus, then it makes a quantum leap. We're in a flat time. Re-jiggering and better hardware will provide some improvement 'til the next jump.';

'>>7135229
So just sculpting and nepotism then?';

'>>7135294
AI will never progress because cultural devastation in the US will lead into reversal of progress and economic decline which the government can only respond to with killing as many civilians as possible and since the government knows they lose in every civil war scenario they will kill their civilians by causing a war early throwing disgruntled corpses into a pit.
This will also stagnate the only countries which could improve AI further, like China, because the truth is China is not actually that well developed and a war with the united states is actually terrifying that's why it will be war by proxy.
The US will not recover from this war accepting enormous amount of immigrants leading to gang wars... i.e. civil war anyways. And since they killed their militaries they cannot militarize fast enough to combat the gang militias. Then the US will balkanize due to failure of federal response. I wouldn't be surprised if the entire western side of the internet is completely gone. Ironically enough the middle east will once again be the only vestige of civilization, cleansing it of degeneracy.
But muslims hate art though so not exactly desirable for most artists. Religious empires always fall quickly though, reconquista will happen again in europe. Muslims will prefer to "civilize" asians since there are already many muslims there.
This was all revealed to me in a dream btw. Also this is obviously all avoidable if governments just treated their people better but let's not live in a made up fantasy land here lmao.
So don't worry guy the future of AI is fucking grim since muslims will think of AI as an abomination and will keep it limited so much that it will almost look like it was never intended to replace humans.';

'>>7136081
oh damn';

'>>7135220
Try sculpting a beautiful statue that will stand for more than a few years before the hordes tear it down for being racist or some other gay reason.';

'>>7136081
>But muslims hate art though
Deeply. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_art

> Also this is obviously all avoidable if governments just treated their people better
Government grows from the people. If the people behaved better, gov agents would be better too.

But people don't want to bother being more respectful to each others.

> Religious empires always fall quickly though
That's a good one. When has there been in history a long-lasting empire who wasn't religious... Atheism is like 100 years old. Widespread atheism probably more 50/60 years old?';

'In the future we'll get ABI , AI will be bowdlerized, and we'll all sculpt stuff.';

'>>7136721
Muslims hate figurative art';

'>>7136837
Figurative art is not art. They have a very rich artistic tradition.

The lack of figurative art comes from an interpretation of the Quran, an interpretation which hasn't always been prevalent everywhere.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shahnameh_of_Shah_Tahmasp';

'ai still needs artists too feed on';

'>>7135220
This is retarded. Just make art that isn't vapid hallow and you can "beat" ai. Context and storytelling.';

'>>7135234
There is a company 3d printing rocket engines, also that lady at MIT 3d printing glass but the striation lines are fat as fuck.';