'>>61469144
>autism simulator for tank fags
Because tank autists are cheap lazy retards.';

'>>61469144
>Why are all tactical tank sim experiences so fucking ass?
>mentions three games that are not tank simulators
Well done, retard. Truly, in an age where we are actually getting full-on tank sim games and you unironically bring up 3 games that are not simulators in any way shape or form.';

'>>61469144
>arcade gulag
>arcade gulag
>tenth remake of a 15 year old game
shit enough to probably be a slide thread but I'll bite and tell you to go play GHPC like the rest of us Armored Fist grogs';

'>>61469144
You know DCS exists right OP?';

'>>61469144
>eastern euro jank
It was eastern euro jank this entire time';

'>>61469144
gunner heat pc is big fun';

'>>61469144
GoH ostfront is about minmaxing as much as possible and still getting RNG’d by a 203mm howitzer that just spawned in the corner of a map, the tanks are just a side piece';

'>>61469144
GHPC and Sprocket exist, one covers the tactical autism and the other covers the engineering autism.

>>61469283
>DCS
>tanks sim
Anon pls';

'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLRSAJl7Vgw';

'>>61469336
Are the tanks in DCS not accurate enough for sim? I never played combined arms before.';

'This faggot has not heard of GHPC nor Steel Beasts';

'World of Warships is fun. It has nothing to do with reality though,';

'>>61469327
It's mostly about having some guys hiding in bushes as close to the enemy as possible, given that all your units have extremely limited vision range, and vision is absolutely everything in that fucking game. The moment you lose vision, you get obliterated, because the enemy's endless unit spam means they'll always have some of your units in vision range and they don't care about losses.';

'>>61469144
>World of tanks
>War Thunde
>Gates of Hell: Ostfront
Give Aces High a whirl. It's just a fun fucking game and beats the ass off all of that junk, even tho it is more geared towards us wing enjoyers,
>hitechcreations.com';

'Just make your own';

'>>61469648
I quit solely due to the sheer amount of bullshit overpowered russian paper ships.
Those fuckers had the audacity to put an entire russian destroyer line with half paper ships (for destroyers for fucks sake) before RN had any full line.';

'>>61469144
I can never get over the fact that both teams are a mixture of Allies and Axis in WoT and WT. Diminishes my internal roleplay';

'>>61469144
GHCP?
or even ARMA modded for your autismo flavour?';

'>>61469771
Poor countries are the bread and butter for a lot of F2P games';

'I wish armor in Squad was better, instead tencent bugmen make ZTZ OP and drop new emotes. I hate this timeline.';

'>>61469144
what about IL2 Tank Crew?';

'>>61469144
Cry and pay big bucks for Steel Beasts. The visual fidelity is terrible, but at least it's a proper tank sim.';

'>>61469144
>WoT
>Chinese


R-r-retard Kun';

'>>61469655
I’m pretty sure on the highest difficulty turning fog of war off is near-mandatory because of how a couple big losses in the first few missions ends a conquest run with how punishing losses are';

'>>61469144
War thunder is a highly accurate tank simulator that is not biased at all.';

'>>61470009
This but unironically. The only people that complain about "bias" in War Thunder are either wehraboos who can't accept the Germans had bad planes or Ameriboos who can't accept they have mediocre tanks.';

'If you're not a filthy casual Graviteam Tactics: Mius-Front is the best battalion level war sim out there. It has changed since release in 2016 but nothing compares to this day.';

'>>61470021
Warthunder is definitely not an accurate tank game.';

'>>61470074
Wehraboo or Ameriboo.
Call it.';

'>>61470028
>4 hours of watching the AI bumblefuck around
>incompetent dev can't implement a basic replay feature and is an asshole';

'>>61469144';

'>>61469459
>tanks in DCS
>combined arms
don't. just trust. don't.

>>61470152
they're not assholes, they're literally ukrainian and esl you dumb fuck.';

'>>61470082
Ya i'm sure that's why';

'>>61469144
In depths tank sim cannot explain why do any armored vehicle carry so much munition not intended for other tank.';

'>>61469144
None of those are Sims. Play Steel Beasts, Retard. OR if you don't want to buy the retarded dongle to play the game then maybe try GHPC.';

'>>61471026
Or ARMA.
>that's not realist-
I KNOW IT ISN'T. But if you're competent and willing to put some time in you can make somewhat real, if flawed, scenarios to show you what various types of engagements look like. You'll have to work around the AI hard as fuck though. But if you want to know what being a Russian conscript under a proper artillery barrage and tank assault looks like, that's the way to do it.';

'>>61471060
I just like steel beasts because it lets you pick individual crew positions and a lot of the tanks are modeled on the inside, which is cool.';

'>>61470082
>ghost shell
>ghost shell
>volumetric eats the shell
>optics eat the shell
>ghost shell';

'>>61469767';

'>>61469144
thats why i switched to helo only in war thunder
sniping tanks from almost 4km with TOWs and make the enemy seethe in chat will never get old';

'>>61469958
SB is pretty terrible in general apart from the sheer depth of the systems modeling
Yes, you can experience the computers on a CV9030 BSODing, no you can't have a non-ass multiplayer component or a map that's half as usable as that from 2001's OFP';

'>>61471656
Yep, and I'll surely never forget the times my round was eaten by tanks tracks, fuel tanks, or tiny pieces of armor that happen to be super strong at one pixel.

>>61474010
Hey hey hey I disdain that sort of behavior; But, its whatever. I've been pollinating multiple nations since the very beginning. So now I just leave early, once the air shit starts.';

'>>61469144
maybe you should post this in /v/, or /vg/'s sim or tactical general
oh wait then you'd discover actual tank sim games like Steal Beasts, SABOW on your own power rather than being a begging fagnigger';

'Is Gates of Hell a good game?';

'Steel Beasts exists. The pro version is used to train real tank crews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel_Beasts';

'>>61469144
>playing WoT as a simulator game
Unironically just play it as an arcade game and it's plenty of fun.';

'>>61474308
basically its Men of War on life support
if you dig this shit and soak up every content its worth the money';

'>>61469144
Red orchestra 1 & darkest hour had the best tank experience imo, WW2 Online was pretty good as well. Unfortunately all three of those games are pretty much dead with the exception of DH which recieved updates essentially killing the tank servers';

'>>61469344
>2:03
Can tank turrets really aim that fast?';

'>>61474496
Is Gates of Hell aimed at single player?
I liked MoW AS 2, but single there is just a set of skirmishes.';

'>>61474576
it has several campaigns, skirmishes, dynamic single player campaign and 3 DLCs

its really good for a MoW/Soldiers game, but you can feel the ravages of time creeping in';

'>>61474592
What GoH did worse than MoW AS2? Or it's the same but better?';

'>>61474602
everything is improved slightly (better direct control, first person views etc). it just feels like they cant push the tech anymore
Men Of War II is scheduled for 2024, probably same old tech
still, im a huge fan since soldiers and they can milk me forever with this';

'>>61474618
>Men Of War II is scheduled for 2024
I am not sure about this one, it looks cartoony. I hope digitalmind buy it and make MoW 2 AS 4 or something.';

'>>61474623
basically its the cancelled Men of War: Arena released as a full price singleplayer/multiplayer title

i played MoW:A during beta in 2020 or 2021.
it was really good imo, no idea why they cancelled it';

'>>61470021
Totally right. Absolutely no bias at all';

'>>61469144
Steelbeasts or GHPC are for the boomer westaboos like (you).

Enjoy shooting T-72 range targets.';

'>>61474647
The problem with War Thunder is that it's missing 90% of the combined arms spectrum, and pretends that it's not a problem.
And then you have retards like >>61470021 who like to talk a lot of shit about things they really don't know anything about.';

'>>61469144
GHPC is good for an early access game.';

'>>61470021
Warthunder has clear and extreme Russian bias.
They even gave money to donbabwe and luganda terrorists.';

'>>61474687
They also do a pretty piss-poor job of the system that's meant to help alleviate those problems. BR is meant to be the hand on the scales making sure that match-ups are never too mechanically unfair but it just doesn't work a lot of the time.
Perfect balance in a game like WT is never going to happen but there's barely even an attempt to make it close in a lot of cases. The early US ground tree is one of the most famous examples for a reason, you end up with early Shermans up against tanks that can pen them from any angle that they can barely pen back even with specialised ammo, when the entire point of BR is to add a layer of game-ification to matchups to help remedy that.';

'>>61469144
>>War Thunder=Russian dogshit
I don't even play Russia anymore.';

'>>61474733
>Strv 103

listen here you little shit';

'>>61474733
>8 kills
>1 Assist
>2.3K XP
>A new tank costs 80K XP
And my friends wonder why I don't play War Thunder anymore';

'>>61474743
Score is not RP. Research points. With premium account, I probably got 4-6k+ research points for this one.';

'>>61469874
You could be playing post scriptum but you are playing call of duty with hiking.';

'>>61474308
If you get it on sale it's great since it has dynamic campaign built in where you can steal enemies vehicles and the campaign admits russian propaganda was complete bullshit which is funny.';

'>>61474772
If you get 4K RP after your premium, that means you got 2K XP.
So if your score is 2.3K, and your XP is between 2K and 3K, then I think it's safe to say that your score is pretty much your XP.
Also, are you trying to say that the grind in War Thunder isn't bad, while also saying you pay money to make the grind less bad?
What's your fucking problem?';

'>>61474808
I'm saying I have 8000 hours played and I lack the perspective of a new player.';

'>>61474822
Every time I unlock a new vehicle, the new vehicle is trash because of the upgrades.
So then I upgrade the vehicle. By the time it's halfway decent, I get a new vehicle.
In practice, every vehicle feels like dogshit unless I decide to go seal-clubbing in a low-tier that I don't get any XP for playing.
So what's the point of the grind? I'm either never going to play the tank again after I get the next one, or it's the one tank in that BR that's worth using, so I'll always use it.
And then when it inevitably gets nerfed I get to throw a temper tantrum and shit up the forums because the meta is incredibly inconsistent and I am an emotionally stunted manchild.';

'>>61470021
Nailed it right on the head, faggy German mains and bonehead amerimutts.';

'>>61474847
>I'm either never going to play the tank again after I get the next one
Well again, from the perspective of someone who has everything, I don't really play top tier anymore.
Right now I play may SK-105 German/French lineups, which are at 8.7. Because I just love this fucker.
I guess i'm past the points of needing to grind, and i'm just playing for fun. But then also I have so many top tier tanks researched, but not bought, because I just don't care. I don't care for 5 flavours of Leclerc or Ariete.';

'>>61474847
The fact that your reward for grinding for a new vehicle is a second grind to make it viable is a fucking astonishing piece of design.';

'>>61469144
Because they are somewhat historical. Would you prefer the Arab-Israeli war? Or Vietnam maybe.';

'>>61474808
You get xp boosts now after a certain number of kills so it isnt as bad anymore with the research but silver lions are a fucking bitch';

'>>61469692
Holy fuck this game is still alive?';

'>>61469144
Here's your 80s-era tank sim.';

'>>61469144
>sims
>doesn't name a single sim';

'>>61475394
Silver Lions aren't an issue below like, 8.7 or so';

'>>61474795
Post Scrotum was bad from the start. And since it shares Squad's engine builds it has the new retarded revive too. I'm a big Market Gardenaboo but not big enough to play PS';

'In my oppinion this is still the best tank sim ever released. The genre is pretty much dead for 20 years now, with the only exception being Steel Beasts, which isn't super playable.

M1TP2 has aged fairly well too';

'Il-2 great battle shas the tanks module that's actually pretty great. It also has a few single player campaigns that are well made. Obviously restricted to ww2 eastern front which is a bit of a downer';

'>>61478283
I think no one mentioned steel beasts because it's the obvious answer when it comes to sims, but op certainly isn't interested in sims. That said steel beasts is awesome and the only drawback is a relatively small community for cooperative play';

'>>61474308
>>61474602
It's MoW AS2 but better in everyway and is 64 bit, so you don't have out of memory errors from fat ass mods
>>61474618
I played the Men of war 2 beta and it was not very good, major downgrade from MoW AS2';

'>>61470021
The thing about bias in war thunder is that russian vehicles are biased to perform better than their IRL counterparts while american and swedish vehicles are biased to perform better relative to other opponents at their matchmaking BRs.';

'I'll take what is Steel Beasts Pro for 400';

'>>61469144
Because no PVP game can do ranged combat justice. It has to do with everyone using different spec PCs and having to create a competitive playing field that's fun for all. You can't have 2 players sitting thousands of meters apart with fully rendered foliage and all the rest of the simulated nature in the landscape in between them, it's too demanding, especially to sync for online play when you start to multiply the number of players by magnitudes. And consoles can't even render any of that stuff for 1 player offline anyways, so forget about that.

It comes down to the fact we simply don't have commonly available powerful hardware to simulate properly. So you're stuck with 2 players sitting on bald hills shooting at each other arcade style.';

'>>61481917
shit internet cope';

'>>61470009
War Thunder engine and model is ok, actually very good considering how good it runs and number vehicles.
Problems of WT
1. It's build around """free to play""" model and "balance". Means you have WWII tanks fighting post war paper projects with jets zooming overhead on battlefield designed to get every player "equal chance"
2. Most players play arcade not sim, so tanks observation optics, crew layout etc doesn't matter because everyone have same 3D point view. Also 3D point view looking over the. corner/ridge exploits. This kills the simulation.';

'>>61470021
>Abrams didn't get spall liner equivalent because nothing in documents indicates it has one
>but this russian tank gets one, no we won't show the documents that site it because it's classified:)
>oh and we won't use classified documents of western equipment for modeling them ingame )))';

'>>61474725
Addition of HEAT slinging vehicles that get matched against late ww2 tanks is stupid as fuck too.';

'>>61470234
>hey're not assholes, they're literally ukrainian';

'>>61481940
There's no ground Sim anymore in War Thunder. There used to be a normal matchmaking, but then they neutered it and replaced with the rolling "events".';

'>>61481940
>>61482463
Sim battles got absolutely forgotten by gaijin
And they refuse to even attempt at doing anything with it other then listing some event modes
Doesnt help the fact that you can only play it with certain vehicles
And that there are now entire copypasta tech trees now which makes identifying between friends and foes a fucking bitch unless you somehow know all the small differences of those vehicles
Also nobody fucking plays it so you need to wait always like 5 mins to get a match';

'>>61482810
>And that there are now entire copypasta tech trees now which makes identifying between friends and foes a fucking bitch unless you somehow know all the small differences of those vehicles
That's fine. My first premium was the German captured KV mit 76mm. So I had to plaster it with balkenkreutzes from every side to minimize friendly fire.
And back in the day we had no IFF hints, like there are now.

But yeah, I'm flabbergasted as to why Gaijin won't lean more into ground sim mode. Develop something like approachable GHPC with matchmaking. It would print money.
Alas, the whole company is ran by Russians.';

'>>61471656
>Optics eat shell
Vision blocks are one thing but I saw one my shells penetrate and M109 hit a periscope and just disappear';

'>>61481940
There is absolutely no logical reason for War Thunder to have this perverse amount of grinding. The developers are straight up psychopaths and pieces of shits. I started playing in 2013 or something, when it was only planes and you could unlock an entire badge of planes by just grinding to a new tier. Even with all those years on my account, the best I could do with long pauses of not playing is getting late WW2 vehicles in Germany, USA and Japan. Even to this day, nobody fucking flies jets. Those games are always 10 players at best. There just is no logical reason why grinding has to take as long as it does in Wart Hunter, no fucking normie with too much cash would ever decide to play for free as much as I did. The only reason why War Thunder still exists is because it has no real competition. World of Tanks is arcade garbage with absolutely fucking retarded game mechanics like invisible tanks.';

'>>61482964
>There is absolutely no logical reason for War Thunder to have this perverse amount of grinding.
f2p';

'>>61482982
I JUST EXPLAINED EXACTLY WHY YOU FUCKING NIGGER';

'>>61482987
I stopped reading after the first sentence.';

'>>61482860
>It would print money.
it won't because sim autists are a tiny minority';

'>>61482964
>There is absolutely no logical reason for War Thunder to have this perverse amount of grinding
pic related.
Premium time, golden lions, RP conversions all exist to make money by letting you skip the grind.';

'>>61469144
>I'm increasingly irritated there's no super in depth autism simulator for tank fags like me
Go fucking enlist. Believe me, actually working in a tank will kill your desire to even simulate the experience.';

'>>61474709';

'>>61483114';

'>>61483114
NTA but
>he doesnt know RASSIYAN GAME caters solely to RASSIYAN audience
It has extreme levels of soviet bias dimwit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLlNLyNbKoc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xME0AeMdZn4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I-DFd3ULMg&t=52
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaNgEvCwAhg
Biggest of them all, 50 nonpens against stalinium-made armor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K48UI0PctZo&t=53
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMFZTDRqqRg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ympznvROrX8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4Kw6gaUx98

How many more prooooofs do you need, old man?!';

'>>61483794
thanks for the links, should be useful for the Encyclopedia Dramatica article.';

'>>61483114
>>61483794
And about donbabwe
From 2021, a year into war:
>War Thunder publisher buying ads in a DPR combatants video
>The games ads are integrated on YouTube channel “Кpyпнoкaлибepный Пepeпoлoх” (Heavy-Caliber Turmoil).
>The video blogger of “Кpyпнoкaлибepный Пepeпoлoх” shoots videos with DPR combatants in the occupied area of Donetsk region.

>The footage is being produced at a small exercise range near occupied Donetsk.
>Facility coordinates: 47.9289343, 38.0001105,343
>The ads are integrated with video demonstrating DPR combatants in the territory of Ukraine.
https://mil.in.ua/en/news/war-thunder-publisher-buying-ads-in-a-dpr-combatants-video/
https://www.thegamer.com/gaijin-entertainment-russia-anti-ukraine-sponsor/
I've tried looking up original video but it seems after this article went live on 4th Jan, he deleted video and reuploaded it on 10th Jan, removing the sponsored fragment and shortening the vid from 18min to 16min https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNi4qVBvywc
Ukrainian article got screenshots with video timeline where it was, and date it was uploaded originally.

So yes, Gaijin does indeed business with donbabwe's and luganda's people.';

'>>61469144
Back a decade ago, I fucking loved World of Tanks.
Nowadays I hate it, turned into a complete cashgrab.
>You MUST get the latest and greatest tank else you'll get powercreeped hard.
>Angling doesn't matter, everyone shoots gold shells
>hull down monsters that you must shoot HE to whittle their HP down, but....
>HE was nerfed to the ground, so is now absolutely useless
>In the process also nerfed all howitzer tanks and made them effectively useless

One of those days a few years ago I selected my Panzer IV to blow off steam with it's howitzer.
I spotted a stug III on the frontline, with it's razorthin armor.
Shot a HE at it, fully confident I would one shot it, or at worst leave him with sub 100 HP. After all, I was a stug III main with some 3000 battles in it.
But the fucker survived, I only did some 130 damage with it. Took another shot and same shit.
Very frustrating, because instead of blowing off steam, I was building more of it.

Only after that match, did I figure out HE was nerfed.
That was also the day I uninstalled

Thanks for reading my blog.';

'>>61469144
ghpc';

'>>61481917
>You can't have 2 players sitting thousands of meters apart with fully rendered foliage and all the rest of the simulated nature in the landscape in between them, it's too demanding
And then allowing people with potato PCs to just disable all the foliage gives people an unfair advantage because all the tryhards will abuse it. Imagine just turning off all of your enemy's concealment because "my poor widdle computah can't handew it".';

'>>61484420
The potato pc players spend the most on the f2p games.';

'>>61484420
Delta Force 2 ran like butter on a 80386 in DOS in 1992. It had detailed foliage, grass and more and detailed bullet physics, destructible environment and penetration of light cover.

Instead of turning off foliage, just do simple foliage to occlude in a fair way. I would prefer that higher graphics settings have a transparency advantage.';

'>>61484843
>Delta Force 2 ran like butter on a 80386 in DOS in 1992
Delta Force 2 came out in 1999 for windows 95';

'This post has been fact-checked by the real gamers.';

'>>61484843
>386
386 couldn't even run doom1 smoothly, you are talking out of your ass, and you got the release year wrong.
I did play it in 2000 on my win98 rig with K6-2 233mhz and no 3D accelerator so I will give you that it ran well on outdated hardware... but thats still about 40+ times faster cpu than your average 386 20mhz is.';

'>>61470021
Naw. I like war thunder but pretending it isn't a video game is ass. Especially the air battles/CAS etc. My God that is a joke.

The tank stuff is gamey, it's like a first person shooter with a tad of realism, as in those tanks existed and on paper they had those things, but it's not realistic.

You want realistic WW2 air combat, play acea high 2. Where the guy at the highest altitude wins and altitude affects engine performance massively. And there's no outside the cockpit views, LMAO.';

'>>61484420
Have you even played a video game in the past 5 or 10 years? Dear fucking lord, I've never met people more willing to open their mouths to spew utter shit than on this website.';

'>>61469459
DCS is an aircraft sim foremost, the ground stuff is there to have a battlefield with combined arms.';

'>no Mechwarrior-style customizable mercenary tank sim in a bizarro-modern setting a la Ace Combat
I still don't understand why no studio has made such a game yet. I would buy it immediately';

'>>61488931
Friendly reminder that the vanilla game had not even a fraction of this level of customizability. I don't know what they were thinking';

'>>61488963
they were thinking about console players, I believe.';

'>>61488931
which mechwarrior is this? i have 5 in my steam library but haven't played it, is it this one?';

'>>61488931
>>61488963
Doesn't matter how much customization the game, or the only mod that saves it has. It's still boring as all fuck with retarded AI.';

'>>61488981
it's Mechwarrior 5: Mercenaries, with a shitload of mods.
a real 6/10 game overall, but it occasionally has its moments.';

'>>61488981
It's 5 with mods.';

'>>61488968
You're probably right. Kind of like arms reforger. I really, really hope to the bohemia gods that they don't go with the console ui in 4';

'>>61488997
>>61488999
>online game
>mods
How's that work? Is it online in the same sense Helldivers is?';

'>>61489005
not MWO
MW5
different games';

'>>61489005
Checksums have been a thing for like 2 generations bud. As long as everyone's mods match, everything's kosher. Hell, even if they don't. You'll just likely run into problems';

'Would be nice to have a tank game that'll let me mix & match armaments and components that could be theoretically compatible, and let me do it on one tank instead of making me buy multiple variants of the same tank. But I'm guessing I'm just describing Sprocket at this point.';

'>>61489007
You can still play it online in the form of coop';

'>>61483794
fuck tanks, take the heli pill

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHH4Wmzrh-0';

'none of those are simulators
they're arcade-sim or sim-lites';

'How do people even stand playing W*rth*nder?';

'>>61489088
Because theres no alternative';

'>>61489103
there absolutely are alternatives to badly and incorrectly simulated aircraft and IFVs in a battlefield resembling a counter strike lobby.';

'>>61489088
General rule for the game is Tier 1 - 3 fun, after that it goes downhill fast and anyone who plays past WW2 vehicles is either a paypig, a faggot paid streamer, a masochist or completely deranged.';

'>>61474772
4-6k RP per game, and with premium, is just painful and main reason why I don't touch ground battles. In contrast, non-premium air RB game is 5-6k and with prem 10-15k, and even then the grind is a slog';

'>>61482964
>There just is no logical reason why grinding has to take as long as it does in Wart Hunter,
"Free to play" model, bait with free but make it hurt so people pay for play. It's ok for model starting game when you don't know would game be popular or not so offer it for free but leave pass for monetization. But this entraps game when it's widely popular. At this stage they would be bette for community if they just offering full game with everything for like $150 or whatever number marketing department gives. But this would angry old players who invested much more money and time into grind and this is just unsolvable mess.';

'>>61484052
This.
Also gocarts and fucking autoloaders everywhere.';

'>>61470021
Nigger there were literally Russian tanks with spalling outright disabled for years';

'>>61484843
>>61484420

>Instead of turning off foliage, just do simple foliage to occlude in a fair way. I would prefer that higher graphics settings have a transparency advantage.
This. On low settings Instead of making detailed bush turn it into solid block with few edges.

Also on Arma forums 10 years ago rher was elegant solution how to render vegetation occlusion across entire map with minimal processing power, but nobody still uses this trick....';

'>>61489325
>doesnt name any of them
Curious';

'>>61489062
>sitting there slinging missiles with one hand on the controls while jacking off with the other
cringe. take the actual heli pill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGgymSK3c64';

'>>61469144
Best tank vidya is girls und panzer game and there needs to be PC port';

'>>61489399
Got a link to that?';

'>>61469144
There’s always Star Citizen. I guarantee there will be large scale Tonk battles weekly.';

'>>61489690
No-one is going to fight tank battles unles both sides agree on some fun or there's mechanical/map restrictions like a no-fly zone that blows you up after 30 seconds in place or all fighting is taking place underground.. You can just take the same 2 people per tank and throw them in a bomber or fighter or strike craft and get equal or better result. Infantry support matters less because SC spacecraft can hover';

'>>61489690
unbe-fucking-lieveable, you subhuman Scam Shitizen cultists even come to /k/, FUCKING /k/ to spread your bullshit marketing attempts for a "game" that will never be finished. I sincerely hope you die in a car crash, fuck off and die.';

'>>61489827
Baset';

'There's just nothing else like War Thunder on the market.';

'Tankfags needs their own DCS for ultra dedicated autism';

'>>61489940
There are dedicated autism options, but they don't have the thing I'm interested in the most, multiplayer.
Rather, they don't have a pick up and play style matchmaking multiplayer.
I don't want to devote 2-3 hours for a preplanned multiplayer session once a week. That's not how I do video games, not anymore.';

'>>61469144
none of these are sims though, faggot';

'>>61489905
War Thunder has retarded combined arms and it has some of the worst maps I've ever seen in a "competitive" multiplayer shooter.
It's not even a real game you're just grinding to unlock more grinding';

'>>61489905
>>61489964
WT is the same amount of brainrot as league of legends, the players are already lobotomized so people keep playing.
it's genius.';

'>>61489964
Sure I agree about the maps. They suck, almost all of them.
But I have everything already, I don't grind. I play for fun, and when I stop having fun, I just stop playing.';

'>>61489947
the most important autistic option that is missing and that I find the most offensive about War Thunder, is that there's no goddamn way to play historically accurate encounters. I'm not even talking about realism mode or some shit, I just want to play scenarios where planes / tanks fight against each other in the correct historical time period. Yes I know they had those limited events, but they were all fucking realistic only and arcade was mixed teams only (what the fuck?) and they've abandoned this game even years ago. It's so FUCKING STUPID, I just want to shoot down Hurricanes or dab on baguettes in my early Bf109 instead of facing a giant random collection of planes every game. Fuck Gaijin, just fuck them. I hate them with a passion.';

'>>61489774
You can enforce a no fly zone, that’s not going to be a problem. If some dipshit shows up with an eclipse or a M2 to try and ruin everyone’s fun they can be dealt with.
>>61489827
Stay mad. Game’s coming out in the next year or two and it’s playable now.
Still 100x better than war thunder/world of tanks';

'>>61490011
>Game’s coming out in the next year or two
i cant breathe ahfhdahahhah';

'>>61490027
Almost in beta. Dont get mad because your little PC can’t handle its unoptimized greatness.';

'>>61489983
I have a friend who loves War Thunder and he has easily over 5K hours on the game. Sometimes he streams the game and does nothing but talk for an hour or two about what new tanks they added or whatever the fuck
I knew my friend was a bit of a rage-quitter, but I tried to introduce him to Escape From Tarkov, and that boy could not handle it.
From his point of view, Tarkov is a completely unfair game, everyone is hacking and IF ONLY he had better gear he would be able to play it. He even told me he would buy hacks because he wasn't able to compete.
He doesn't get the instant hit of dopamine you get from playing an easy, casual game like War Thunder, and so his frustration goes up. His frustration tolerance is negative one billion, and so he throws a temper tantrum and rage quits.

This is what I see in War Thunder players, low-attention span autists who freak the fuck out when their little world is challenged in any way';

'>>61490040
hhhaahahaha pls stop i cant take it,chest hurtss';

'>>61490048
This is also the guy who pestered me to buy Chivalry 2 to play with him, and then when he did he threw a temper tantrum because some guy killed him twice with a maul, and the maul is the most OP weapon and only a loser and a hacker and a cheater would ever use the maul they should nerf the weapon and anyone who ever used a maul should be banned and have their account deleted
like fuck bro I'm just trynna have fun';

'>>61490048
but that makes no sense, War Thunder is riddled with cheaters. They're sniping you from across the entire map through dense forests 24/7. The amount of rage you feel from just getting killed by Russian Bias alone is enough to give someone a stroke.';

'>>61490050
>average war thunder boomer who can’t afford a real PC
It’ll be okay, little buddy, in a few years we’ll have cheap PCs that can run games too.';

'>>61490079
You are a W key holder.
My friend is the one camping the meta sniping spot.';

'>>61490086
man fuck off I just built a new rig three days ago, you still won't see me installing your half a billion dollar scam on my 'puter any time soon.';

'>>61490109
You can play the entire game for $40, you don’t need to buy expensive ships. Just ask one of the hundreds of thousands of other people if you can fly with them. People in this game are cool as fuck as long as you don’t shoot them in the head and steal their ships.';

'>>61490118
lmao';

'>>61490118
>commits 10k USD ships in shop
War thunder is shit, but scam citizen is down right nasty';

'>>61490118';

'>>61469648
Most people know jack shit about naval warfare, so it's funny in conversation when people spout wows mechanics thinking they are reality. Things like "showing too much broadside is bad"';

'>>61490137
You don't need to buy anything but the bare minimum $40 starter package and join an org.
You will be able to buy any ship you want in the game.';

'>>61469586
>steel beasts
Not OP, but I'm not getting jewed for 100 shekels so I can wait for a codestick to arrive.';

'>>61490190
>so I can wait for a codestick to arrive.
That's not a thing anymore. Rather they have a software solution.
Shit, you can even pay them like 5 or $10 to play it for a month.';

'>>61490196
Is it any better than Arma 3?';

'>>61490202
I don't think it's worth it. It doesn't have multiplayer
(rather you have to find people to play with yourself). The mission editing is like in Arma so I've spent most time just fucking around making some basic scenarios.
GHPC is a better game. Because SB is only nominally a game.';

'>>61470167
That's an RTS/RTT, not a tank sim.';

'>>61490118
Anon can you help me make sense of how $40 gets you the full game but other people are spending literally tens of thousands on it? It seems like either they're paying for an advantage or they're absolute fucking idiots I don't want to share a community with.';

'>>61490259
Whales, they exist everywhere. Spending $25,000 on ships doesn't give you a tactical advantage or anything.

Larger/capital ships require many hands to run. You can fly them by yourself but you're just the pilot, and you don't have access to most of the turrets. You're going to (eventually) need a flight engineer, most ships have their firepower heavily restricted unless you got homies in the manned turrets.

For example, the Redeemer can be flown solo. It's a 3 man ship, you have 2 giant ass turrets on it that absolutely shred, and the pilot weapons are much weaker by comparison.
The Hammerhead is a gunship that has 6 manned turrets and the pilot can't use any of them.
The $40 starter package is a solo flight ship you can pick from that can do a bunch of things you don't need other people for like solo space combat, deliveries, or transportation. The game is also a FPS so you can wear armor and have guns and stuff like that including rocket launchers, railguns, LMGs, whatever.

You do missions, you make money, you can buy better ships with in-game money.
You can make friends pretty easily, all these whales need people in their turrets. You get a group together and do big missions and split the money with your teammates.';

'Why the fuck are we talking about Star Citizen?';

'>>61490358
It has tanks in it, it's a sim';

'>>61490359
I don't think it's a sim.';

'>>61490363
SC is a sim';

'>>61490377
It's as sim as Planetside is.';

'>>61490379
You have a character that has to eat, drink, visit different planets to buy different components for ships/weapons
You have the potential to trade with a ship, there are giant cargo container ships in game right now you can load with commodities and do trade loops and earn a considerable amount of money
There is both NPC piracy interdiction and real players who do piracy and can blow your ship and harvest your cargo for a profit
You'll have the ability to stake a claim on a planet somewhere like a mine and defend that claim with real people and guns
It's a sim.';

'>>61490402
We're talking about tank simulation. War Thunder is more of a tank sim.';

'>>61470167
Gave the demo a try and enjoyed it immensely, but I'm gonna wait for the free dlc to drop before I buy it
also glad to see that the Sea Power devs have started to post updates more frequently, it was radio silence for a long time';

'>>61490413
Arma 3 is a tank sim, War thunder/WoT is a FPS with tanks instead of infantry.';

'>>61469144
Wot was always russian dogshit.
>be in /v/ clan back in the day
>we're all actually good or decent at the game
>because of this we're instantly better than 90%+ of the player base
>wg holds community tournament to celebrate a new map
>we join and sweep it because all the other big clans try to play meta and not just taking the current broken Soviet tank
>afterwards at has us join a chat with the devs
>ask us what we think
>tell them the map is dogshit and doesn't play how they think it should, they should just remove it
>they say they put a lot of time and effort into it and it would take a lot to redesign it then ask about balance
>tell them the state of the game and how most Soviet vehicles are just outright better with the paper stats they have
>they just say they won't be making changes because it would upset their primary audience
At least they got rid of severogorsk.

Is the game balance still a joke? Haven't played in years';

'>>61490196
And to buy it permanently? I just don't like subscription services.';

'>>61490449
$115';

'>>61490402
>its a Sim!!!!
>Describes a MMO';

'>>61490501
It is a sim though, the developers even call it a sim.
The controls are similar to DCS which is also a sim.';

'>>61490345
mate, I've played IL-2 Sturmovik back in the day. Nobody, absolutely nobody wants to sit in the turret for what feels like hourse, in the hopes of getting to shoot at something. Anyone who was unfortunate enough to get a turret position on a coop mission ALT-F4'd the moment he realized what was going on. This is complete and utter bullshit, a retarded game concept with no plan or idea. It's a scam.';

'>>61490522
KSP is a sim.';

'>>61469144
>>World of tanks=chinese dogshit
it's actually russian dogshit';

'>>61490534
tetris is a sim.';

'>>61481667
>american bias
lmao are you delusional
T-80UD: 10.0
base M1:10.3';

'>>61490553
not a space sim';

'>>61490563
it can be';

'>>61490525
It's not like that. The action is as frequent as you make it, and aside from trips to port to resupply/repair you can go from mission to mission in some very target-rich environments.
If you're in an org, they'll have daily events set up where you can join up and make money, or do heavy RP or whatever your org is into.
The larger ships are supposed to be supplied bare and will require a heavy cash flow to finance so people aren't just rolling around in fully stocked Javelins with 50 people inside of them';

'>>61490632
It's like talking to a pyramid scheme addict. Fucking cultists man.';

'>>61470021
>Ameriboos who can't accept they have mediocre tanks.
oh no no no no you done it now';

'>>61488901
>Have you even played a video game in the past 5 or 10 years?
No.';

'>>61490645
I know right, it's almost like if they made video games for people in first world countries.';

'>>61469144
Because crewing a tank is fucking ass.';