'>>61469298
360/1=360
360/2=180
360/3=120
360/4=90
360/5=72
360/6=60
360/7=51.4285714286
360/8=45
360/9=40
360/10=36
Conclusion: 7 shot revolvers are satanic aberration and should not be made';

'>>61469350
wtf why do circles do this mathniggers please help';

'>>61469298
why is it in .32hr instead of .327mag?';

'>>61469350
mased circlemath poster owning the furfags. pi is 2 you fucking retards';

'>>61469442
327 federal magnum is cope, 32 H&R knows its place';

'>>61469298
There's not enough space. It's already a 6-shot J-frame, giving you +1 capacity over all other center-fire J-frames.
>>61469475
More power, and being able to shoot the other caliber is cope now? Sounds like your poor and/or stupid.';

'>>61469547
*you're poor and/or stupid
Apologies for a grammatical mistake you probably wouldn't have noticed or understood.';

'>>61469547
Not him, but you really shat the bed there.';

'>>61469547
No it’s cope because more power not more better';

'>>61469350
My xd literally has 666 on it but it never raped me. My 686+ however causes my sleep paralysis nigger to whisper "retard retard retard" over and over again in my ear.
Pls explain.';

'>>61469350
Mathematical proof that I want a 1cd shot revolver for a ...well rounded gun.';

'>>61469547
if it was 7 then it would actually be a cool gun people would talk about instead of it being a meme for boomers and a marketing ploy to sell 32 caliber barrels nobody wants';

'>>61469442
Because this uses an aluminum frame, and .327 Federal is almost twice the pressure of .32 H&R.

Hopefully, the success of these revolvers leads to S&W making steel-framed J-Frames in .327. I like my Taurus 327, but I would absolutely buy a S&W equivalent.';

'>>61469658
Even if it had 7 rounds, you wouldn't buy it';

'>>61469298
Geometry. The J-frame cylinder window is not tall enough to accommodate a 7-shot .32 cylinder.
>>61469442
Because 32H&R is significantly easier to shoot.
>>61469658
>if it was 7
It cannot be 7, 7 rounds do not fit in a j-frame. It was not a conscious decision to exclude the 7th round. If it held 7 you would be saying "they had to make the "small" gun big for the meme round". Your complaint is with basic physical reality.
>marketing ploy to sell 32 caliber barrels
A saving grace of conspiracy nuts are also extremely stupid, you're "our" retards.
S&W does not profit from "selling barrels", they are not a barrel company, they are not members of the barrel cartel. They don't specifically benefit from people choosing to shoot either .38 or .32.';

'>>61469475
32H&R is the biggest "small" round IMO. Small meaning you can hand a light defensive gun, loaded with defensive ammo, to anyone, and so long as they wouldn't reject shooting a .22 they also won't reject shooting the round you handed them. It's a little round for little guns.
327 is over the line. If it was made in the 30's it would have become a "duty" cartridge.';

'holy shit the amount of faggots acting like .327 is going to rip your arm off compared to HR is sad. Is SW making these threads? Stop making trash no one wants, get that faggy hole off your wheel guns, and if you make a .32 magnum have it accommodate .327. Then you can chamber HR if you want, and whine about follow up control because you're a giant puss.';

'Holy shit the amout of faggots that think you can make an aluminum framed revolver in .327 mag is sad';

'>>61472668
>but it has to be the way I did it, because I already fucked up.
dilate';

'>>61475014
Why get mad about it when we already have 2 companies making steel .327, ruger and taurus, I think we need more aluminum .32s because the only one made now is charter.';

'>>61471028
True conspiracy chads know that Smith & Wesson is a zombie corporate slave to the Saf-T-Hammer corporation which exists to pay exorbitant license fees to the private owners of Saf-T-Hammer for every Hillary Hole they sell.';