'no. they couldn't clear it if NOBODY was in it; it's too big';

'>objective is kill the guy
>Have jets tanks helicopters
>Nahh lets send infantry in instead of just sending them after bombing the place to poke around the rubble making sure the dead are indeed dead
>Not capture him and put on a trial so you can lay out his crimes explaining why he should be punished and essentially do the victor writes history thing';

'>>61469612

>>dont destroy a landmark in the process
>>slay a hated tyrant
>>whichever fireteam finds him first gets the kill';

'>>61469612
>>61469624
trump isn't president though';

'No. The Secret Service is on regular rotation, has armor defeating munitions, are largely former special forces, can't be "snuck up" on, know the layout inside and out, and the grounds are too large for one team to maintain. They'd be found, funneled into a killing zone, and dealt with. Hollywood makes the Secret Service look as useless as the Emperor's Red Guards, but reality is a very different story, especially after John Hinkley and the Pope shooter.';

'>>61469664

The movie had them outgunned and outnumbered, literally the last men before the bitter end.';

'>>61469678
> The movie

Anon, what did I JUST say?';

'>>61469630
Perish commie.';

'>>61469664
It is much easier to make the opponents look like literal retards than it is to make the guys who are supposed to win look competent, and film makers are fucking lazy.';

'>>61469664
okay, what force would it take to capture the white house? Could an infantry battalion do it? Or 1st Cavalry Division or V Corps?';

'>>61469730
you can't really "take" a heavily fortified structure with panic rooms, unmapped underground areas, nuclear bomb shelters, and prepared defenders. You probably couldn't even destroy it without bunker busters.';

'Secret Service would just engage in a fighting retreat where they stall for time until everyone can get to a secure location (either off-site or in a defensive panic room). Now what? It's you looking at some giant steel door. Do you have the ability to get past this? Likely not. And in this time the real military is showing up which is now just as well equipped as you are.';

'>>61469752
so what options does an attacker have if the defending position is completely invincible and impervious to all weaponry? just surrendering?';

'>>61469821
there are three options:
>bunker buster
>try unconventional shit like flooding or smoke until you run out of ideas
>sit on them until they realize they didn't bring any porno mags and surrender

#1 usually works for the US
#2 worked a few times during WW2
#3 worked for Russia at Azovstal';

'>>61469821
prepare the trebuchets and organize the engineers, for the scouts reckon they are set in for a 36 month siege at the soonest and the king wants this keep before snowfall';

'>>61469730';

'>>61469706
a completely unhinged response';

'>>61469730
Realistically? A building that size is BN objective to do it right. If you didn't have to worry about inner and outer cordons you might get away with using one company.';

'>>61469593
>>61469612
yeah this scene was retarded, it would be beneficial for all parties to negotiate a surrender

honestly I hated how the movie never really showed the rebelling/opposition governments, I understand the movie wanted to be "non political" or whatever but everything was so fucking vague';

'>>61469706
There's a 95% chance you don't even know what capital is, let alone gommunism.';

'>>61469664
>are largely former special forces

Source?';

'>>61469664
And what arms and armor do they have though';

'>>61470199
This is the most retarded shit I've ever seen.

>>61469593
White House Down did it cooler IMO. Probably even had more of an agenda to say than Civil War.';

'>>61470219
Forgot pic';

'One of Delta Force's job is to test the security of government installations. There's a youtube video of a former Delta operator talking about how they secretly parachuted into the White House and were not detected. He showed a picture of them parachuting in, I didn't think to save it.';

'>>61470194
arent usss almost all former delta and seal team 6?';

'>>61470417
No. Anyone can join.';

'>>61469593
Nah dude';

'>>61470417
Haven't you seen female Secret Service?';

'>>61470468
>Asking me to do my job is colonial patriarchy rooted in the oppressive systemic norms of white male cultures of structural power imbalances
Kek yeah I think one squad ought to be able to capture Joe Biden just fine.';

'>>61469706
100% corn fed midwestern chad right there';

'>>61469924
The surrender already happened. They say so before the final scene. Its supposed to be a dictators last stand with what few remnants are left.';

'This movie looks awful';

'>>61469593
I didn't watch whatever stupid goyslop shit movie you're talking about. IRL no, there are more SS and White House PD people than them, and most SS are very well trained and prior military to boot. And most importantly help would be there in literal minutes in the form of every SS agent and DCPD officer and White House Mall Cop in a 10 mile radius speeding to the scene of the mass shooting you are describing. And then if you did escape you would need to fight and or evade every single FBI agent, US Marshall, State Police, and angry homeless person in the NOVA/MD area for multiple days.';

'>>61469730
>>61469884
I'd think a well trained Company could do it, if they brought an inordinate amount of ATGM's, CS grenades, and Thermite.';

'>>61470691
This, but you'd have to use a suitable weapon for commie and trumptard deletion, like a Mini 14, M14, AR15 or 1911. Something very American.';

'>>61469593
Any actual action/warcrimes leaks from the movie yet?';

'>>61470216
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secret_Service#Weapons

Check it out';

'Honestly, if you want to seize the White House the best way to do it is surround the place and send someone well spoked with a white flag of truce to parley. If they refuse, just burn the place down and shoot them as they flee.
>verification not required';

'>>61470663
Now for the real question, what percentage of American gunowning military families support the current president, Childsniffer Biden, enough to die for him in a civil conflict?';

'>>61470691
>>61470710
Shut the fuck up commie.';

'>>61470859
None, hence the huge push to get illegals and gangbangers into the military to do the work of confiscation that the existing populace won't abide.';

'>>61470859
none but they probably would not frame the conflict as supporting Biden the individual, work on your theory of mind';

'>>61470875
Are you retarded enough to think that illegal immigrants care about the US government at all beyond avoiding deportation?';

'>>61470611
sure, congress was a catwalk on jan 6 but white house is supposed to be a fortress';

'>>61470859
The military swears to uphold the Constitution, not an individual leader or particular political party. You can frame yourself as a patriot good guy, but if you are engaged in the violent overthrow of the Constitutionally elected government then you are a traitor and the US military is your enemy. Full stop.';

'>>61471321
This. The military would have nuked California and Texas before it bent the knee like was shown in the movie.
Vivat Constitutione!';

'>>61470859
'Gunowning' doesn't really matter. The government has access to plenty of stockpiles so that anyone who volunteers or is conscripted to fight for it can be armed.

You also face the traditional problem of rebellion, which isn't that you have to give people a reason not to rebel, but a reason to support the rebellion. Civil wars are typically extremely destructive and anyone starting them has to have very good reasons if they don't want to lose support of the majority of the population the micro instant the government plasters the face of children who died in the fighting across all the news - which they would control, so the worst actions of the rebels would be broadcasted time and time again. The US military has already passed up multiple instances they could rebel or at least force their demands throughout the last century, it would take a LOT for that to change.';

'>>61471321
>The military swears to uphold the Constitution, not an individual leader
lies.
"[...] I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me [...]"';

'>>61471321
>The military swears to uphold the Constitution
Will that apply when they are ordered to confiscate the arms people have the right to keep and bear?';

'>>61469664
>especially after John Hinkley and the Pope shooter
>and Lee Harvey Oswald and Sirhan Sirhan and the shoe thrower
>and Jake Sullivan's home intrusion and the Cartagena scandal';

'>>61471824
Depends which oath you are reading. "I, A.B., do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God"';

'>>61470417
Maybe some of the dedicated tactical teams and counter snipers, otherwise no.';

'>>61471892
Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice a serviceman has a "duty to disobey" orders that are illegal, ie "contrary to the Constitution" or the laws of the United States, or obviously illegal things like criminal activity. A widespread mobilization to oppress the citizens of the US by depriving them of their Constitutional rights would hit resistance starting with the first General to recieve the order at the Pentagon and at every level all the way down to the lowest Private. The only legal way to deprive Americans of the Second Amendment is for Congress or a Constitutional Convention with 2/3rds of the delegates proposing to repeal the 2nd Amendment, followed by 3/4s of the States to ratify it. So you would need 66 Senators and 287 Congressmen to pass the amendment at the federal level, folllowed by 38 states ratifying the amendment. What do you suppose the change of this happening is? I reckon it's about nil.';

'>>61469706
Question.
If teabagging is when you dip your balls up and down in someone’s mouth, what’s the maneuver in the video called? Hacky sacking?';

'>>61473136
shhh anon, you're ruining the boog fantasy, he cant get hard without it';

'i knew a guy that became a secret service agent and protected PotuS. no idea how he passed the background check. he seemed like a guy that was always about to snap. but - i don't doubt he would've taken one for PotuS.';

'>>61473136
>wait until Congress deadlocks
>declare State of Emergency
>Send brigades (cols and brigs) to force Congress to pass certain laws
>???
>Profit';

'>>61469593
Most conventional CQB doctrine recommends a minimum of 2 men for each room in the building and ideally 4, the white house has over 100 rooms.

It would not be possible to secure it with only 5 men.';

'>>61469612
>bomb the complex
>go in to look at the rubble
>everything is super bombed but you don't find his body
>but he's also not been seen since the bombing
so... is he dead?

sometimes it's better to have guys on the ground if you want to confirm that the job gets done. bombs don't have eyes and can't report back on what they hit.';

'>>61469593
Hey, don't sell the "airmen" short! Apparently they can follow faggots around and get into their walls or something!';

'>>61473418
Rent free inside your walls schizo';

'>>61469924
I agree it would make for a better movie but the intent was to shock people into rethinking where polarization is leading us and why.

>>this is the future you are choosing';

'>>61470608

its alright. not great not terrible. memorable scenes held back by weird trying to be cool.

The point is to show how US could look if civil war breaks out. Images you know twisted into perversion. Story is meh.';

'>>61469593
Had two run ins with Secret Service in my time. They seem like a bunch of retarded thugs. I'm sure the one who actually guard the president are better than the cocksuckers I met.';

'>>61470239
How well u reckon gliders would work?';

'>>61469924
The movie wasn't "non-political," you just got filtered by the fact that it wasn't about meaningless grievance-based dog-and-pony-show party politics.

It was about the media's role in our perception of conflict. The war was depicted the exact same way movies and news media depict every single war-torn third world shithole and the protagonists are unlikable adrenaline junkie tourists who don't give a shit about the ideological underpinnings of the conflict because war journos are unlikable adrenaline junkie tourists who don't give a shit about the ideological underpinnings of the conflicts they cover.

The movie isn't about some alt-history shit, that wasn't the point. It's Nightcrawler in a warzone, and the warzone is America because the target audience (America) doesn't think twice about violence when it's illiterate goatfucking retards in the desert shooting each other, and maybe if it was Lonnie from North Carolina who you went to high school with and kinda knew but lost touch and last you heard he got a job roofing then the violence would be a little more shocking.

Every single liberal and conservative film critic who's mad this film didn't turn their perceived enemies into cartoon characters is bragging about getting filtered.';

'>>61473136
desu the significance of California and Texas, the two States with the highest numbers of military personnel in the country, being the force that overthrows the President, is being missed by people whose retard brains are stuck in muh red state muh blue state

The movie depicts a military coup.';

'>>61473888
That sounds gay and somehow even more cliche than if the movie were about partisan politics';

'>>61469706
imagine the aftersex';

'>>61470663
I feel like any true appalachia son with a 12 gauge and birdshot could land a drone';

'>>61473907
>movie portraying journos as sociopathic thrillseeking faggots profiting off and enabling the misery of others is "somehow even more cliche" than another alt-history concept that was done to death 30 years before the zoomer I'm replying to was even born
Ok';

'>>61473958
>you Americans are such hypocrites! How would you feel if this was happening to you?
Seen it literally hundreds, if not thousands of times. No wonder nobody cared and tuned it out.';

'>>61473967
Again it's not about the Americans or not, retard-kun. You could literally set the fuckin movie in any civil war on earth in the last 70 years without changing anything, they just set in America for the shock value to their target audience.

The movie is about the journalists being sociopaths.';

'>>61473967
>Seen it literally hundreds, if not thousands of times
Name 10 examples.';

'>>61473988
By your own account it was presented in a
>you Americans are such hypocrites! How would you feel if this happened to you?
Manner, which you seem to think would shock the audience. It doesn't. It makes their eyes glaze over.';

'>>61474005
The entire anti-Western genre';

'>>61474021
>first the 100-minute movie filters anon
>then a post with less than 2000 characters does the same';

'>>61474036
The concept is boring. Sorry, dunno what else to tell you.';

'>>61474021
>you seem to think would shock the audience
anon sure rustled your jammies with it so it appears to work just fine';

'>>61469593
>"Mr President, come with me"
>"There's been a breach in the west wing"
>Hide the president in an underground bunker
>Lock the door

Yeah, don't think it's gonna happen';

'>>61475019
And then he either an heroes or eventually starves to death inside the bunker.';

'>>61475681
If you think that the bunkers underneath the White House A) don't have exits and B) don't have several decades worth of supplies then I don't know what to tell you.';

'>>61475783
> A) don't have exits
Into a city that will be crawling with enemy troops since they would know that the President is free
>B) don't have several decades worth of supplies
They don’t. Because they were never intended to hold up to months and years long sieges. They’re just there to keep the President safe long enough for the Calvary to arrive and rescue him.';

'>>61475809
I think you forgot the part where the thread says "can 1 fireteam clear the white house", and the answer is a resounding no.';

'>>61475809
>city crawling with one fireteam
Your dick is so hard you forgot the topic of the thread.';

'>>61473888
You remind me why I wish X-men went a little bit further with character depth, or in other words probably a smaller cast per movie.
Comic book fans love X-Men for its emotional weight, beyond most other comic book stories. But I'm not a comic book nerd myself, so instead I'm always at "man this is so close to being good."
They must be good movies though, because I still remember a lot about them. Whether or not I complain about them.';

'>>61473888
nigga I dont care about strawmanning my enemies, I just wanted a cool movie to watch
> It's Nightcrawler in a warzone,
ok yeah I see this you're right, the real problem with the movie is it sucked';

'>>61470663
Ya no, the fucking secret service tactical team would slaughter them. They are better trained better equipped, on home terrain. And it's not normal terrain it's terrain, with hidden cameras and shielded doors. Probably gas barriers and other shit. You would need that full BN going in at once.';

'>>61470859
Lots, you just don't associate with them, like I don't associate with gunowners who support Trump. We'll except in this palace of schizo's.';

'>>61473967
Name 1 fucking example. That isn't this fucking movie.';

'>>61475821
>>61473825
>>61472490
>>61470744
I mean they only have swat team level shit fighting guys with lmgs anti material rifles explosives and heavy machine gun artillery air support and access to reserve forces also usually if they ever end up in this position they will usually get the president out and let the military handle it';

'>>61471010
Congress was easy on January 6th because the life of the POTUS was not at risk, the VP was being moved to another area, and everyone else involved was heavily pressured not to do the needful and gun down several thousand middle aged rich white people. Someone attempting to breach the White House without warning would result in a massive fucking gunfight immediately.';

'>>61480987
There seemed to be an invitation at one of the entry points, for the sake of incriminating, discrediting, and intimidating the mob afterwards.
I remember there being 3 entry points.
Entrypoint 1 - the mob did get into a shoving match with police and push over the a-frames.
Entrypoint 2 - some of the police were even sympathetic and opened the a-frames. And I recall those cops got suicided a few months later.
Entrypoint 3 - sympathetic cameras were on the spot, the gates were opened, and then the SS guy was filmed running up an interior stairwell, juking & panicking like he was fleeing for his life. Then like 10 seconds later the MAGAtard column casually walk up the stairs.
To me J6 stinks overall. God rest that idiot Ashley Babbitt's soul, eternal damnation for the psycho SS mulatto.

>>61480987
Woah there MacArthur.';

'>>61481036
>eternal damnation for the psycho SS mulatto.
nah she deserved it. do not attempt to break into the capitol building without body armor and rifles.';

'>>61479343
>>61479390
FUCKING.... the FUCKING... FUCKING believe me, holy FUCK. FUCK';

'>>61481045
No, a warning shot would have sufficed.
Also, black tactical gear fully clad, M4 wielding Capitol security were already standing around by the walls, unmolested, among the MAGAtards.
That SS guy bragged on social media about being immune from repercussions thanks to his position, after he was found to have misplaced his pistol in a restroom. He just wanted to kill somebody, anybody.';

'>>61481124
>actually mentioning
>warning shots
>on /k/
>>>/pol/';

'>>61481124
>a warning shot would have sufficed

Bitch deserved to die and so did every traitorous fuck with her.';

'>>61481187
>>61481175
Escalation of force
Policing context';

'>>61481215
Yes, the escalation of force is when they shoot you for trying to gain access, as a mob, to the Capitol Building while the VP is present.';

'>>61481187
May you reap as you have sown.';

'>>61481215
say what you will about Bush Jr., but he was a fun president (if you ignore all the people he got killed)';

'>>61473347
You can have Santa Claus personally lead the troops into Congressional chambers, followed by the Easter Bunny and Tooth Faerie gunning down any politicians who object.';

'>>61470194
they're not, they're police';

'>>61481124
>He just wanted to kill somebody, anybody.
It's a good thing he was presented with a traitorous retard attempting to violently breach a secure barrier right there in front of him.';

'>>61470859
>enough to die for him in a civil conflict?
a spattering of wackjobs, effectively 0';

'>>61479361
>Lots, you just don't associate with them
Yea, because they're retarded. Genuine and unironic Biden supporters would resemble something out of the Fetterman family because you would have to be that dumb/inbred/malformed to not know what the play is here. These retarded people reasonable anons don't associate with aren't exactly threats that anyone is worried about, because they're simply not capable of doing much.';

'>>61481244
I see Bush and Biden as ironic mirrors.
The entourage around Bush got a lot of people killed by being arrogant and hawkish beyond their talents.
The entourage around Biden is presently getting a lot of people killed by being tepid and bumbling.
Both find miraculous levels of difficulty with expressing whole sentences in English.
Both are seeing a surge in military spending to save either today or tomorrow from their mistakes.';

'>>61470151
Apparently the other countries where it failed didn't either what it was either';

'>>61481363
Oh boy I wonder what the next "terror attack" is going to be that gets America all frothed up for another pointless foreign war of "revenge". That's the next logical step in this never ending ride.';

'>>61469593
Lol no, they are going to have to move extremely fast before every LEO, Military and National Guard unit within range gets there.
They don't have time to clear shit.

If the goal is just killing a politician why goto one of the most secure places on earth when they spend half their time standing in the open at golf courses?';

'>>61469924
Historically the best way to end a civil war without another starting instantly is to get the old government leaders to publicly surrender and hand over power.

>>61473802
The media and politicians have worked hard to make the voting public as politically and economically illiterate as possible, they are never going to understand the consequences of that.
Their last words will be "why" because they won't get they are the cause.';

'>>61481381
The next act will be real just as the last was and just like last time they'll already know which countries are going to be invaded even if the guys that did it turn out to be in neither.';

'>>61481443
Do you think Russia will be behind it, or maybe they'll blame China?

I'm fully expecting them to do something with China, the debt is insane and eventually those bugmen are gonna call in that debt but America won't be able to pay it. Nor will Canada.

WW3 bebe';

'>>61481482
China is the new USSR and just like the USSR it'll only be proxy wars and chest thumping.
US politicians have been gagging to invade Iran for decades and the guys in the Pentagon that have been telling them it's a terrible idea the whole time will be coming up on retirement.
IMO the next major war (think Vietnam not GWOT) is going to be a US invasion of Iran.';

'>>61469706
The best part about this is the restraint at the end.
Later seen on reddit:
>A literal nazi almost killed me AMA';

'>>61481499
That would be very disappointing, we just wrapped up 20 years in that desert and I was hoping for some jungle vibes or maybe the Marines could actually do some Marine related stuff in the pacific. GWOT was kino for a while but then it just got boring.
You're probably right in that it will be in Iran, and that'll lead to a nuclear strike by Iran combined with global terrorist cells attacking Western countries. Maybe then we can finally all get digital IDs that are read by CCTV and laser grids everywhere we go and everything we do is fuckin geotagged and timestamped until we die YAY.';

'>>61469664
>are largely former special forces
Lmao at actually believing this. No, the majority of Secret Service agents are basic ass agents who were good enough to be assigned from a field office to a Presidential detail';

'>>61481512
>>61481499
>>61481482
I agree with the Iran target.
It's a smaller target than Chainur, we don't have economic interlinks, and Cassus Belli / narrative is already built with Red Sea Houthi harrassment & missile attacks against God's Elect.
>no public support, youth skeptical
I'm not sure to what extent youth opinion matters until a half-generation down the line. It seems to me that youth opinion is totally irrelevant until the kids are physically occupying the seats of the officials they hate today. At which point, those kids make new mistakes as adults, and are similarly despised by the next youth cohort.

Anyway, whatever is chosen as the next trick to trigger action, it will pull in enough warm bodies that vehicles can get underway and ammunition can be reloaded. You don't need a happy or unified population to at least meet that bar.
It doesn't get reported here, but Kurds and Azerbaijanis, and Afghanis shoot at Iranian police and military.
I would guess that an important gauge of the enterprise against Iran, would be to note any changes in organization, aggressiveness, and weaponry used by Iran's various rebels.
I would guess that the US has re-learned not to get stuck into COIN. And also that, although the DoD will probably be able to fool and fill enough billets for maneuver warfare and bombardment, it will not find enough recruiting depth to support a COIN occupation, even if it wanted to.

So keeping tabs on Iranian rebels, and on their popular interpretation of Islam, would be important because Iranians themselves are intended be the occupation.';

'>>61481660
Public opinion doesn't matter, the worst western anti-war protests of the 20th century were over Vietnam and it didn't matter.';

'>>61469730
Just use gas at night';

'>>61470859
It's unfathomable for Trumptards to not support a single leader. Must be the nazi mindset.';

'>>61478701
>ok yeah I see this you're right, the real problem with the movie is it sucked
I seriously hope you don't mean Nightcrawler';

'Liberals be all like "erm why do you need ar-15? The government has fighter jets they will bomb u" then they make movie where president causes civil war by bombing us citizens and poops himself under a desk and gets shot with no one defending him';

'>>61481867
>it didn't matter
LOL';

'>>61482040
>7 years of protests
I guess it could have run longer but I think being longer than WW2 proves they didn't care that much.
Can you even name a longer US war other than the GWOT?';

'>>61473931
bet the dude getting slapped secretly liked it and fapped to this memory for months after.';

'>>61482071
The Vietnam protests were part of what defined American culture and politics in the ensuing years.';

'>>61482110
Different anon
>Vietname protests defined American culture
This seems like a Hollywood distortion. When I look into attitudes and Boomers reminiscing about their concerns at the time, I get the impression they just wanted to grill and not worry about things, same as today. That most Murcans were of the half-hearted opinion, "Well, War's a terrible thing surely, but Communism's bad, so... hey did you catch Browns vs. Redskins?"
The most opinionation I ever heard, was my paternal grandfather saying he was gonna move the whole family to Canada if my Dad or Uncles ever got a Draft notice. In practical terms, even that's mostly passive with regards to protesting the State.';

'>>61482148
The opposition to Vietnam dramatically accelerated everything else that was going on the the '60s. The political hangover from the war lasted in some ways until Desert Storm. A big reason why politics are so partisan and dysfunctional now is because the after effects of the Iraqi insurgency. Public opinion does actually matter even if power structures make efforts to downplay and limit it';

'>>61469598
just get a bunch of those tactical door wedges. seal every door in the white house. no one enters. no one leaves.';

'what shitass movie is op from, i need some new slop to consoom';

'>>61482163
Same anon
>war protesters accelerated the 60's
This I can agree with. It's a step down from saying it "defined."
What I would offer up, as the time&place where the current US cultural course was defined, would be the early 1910's, among the proto-technocrat Progressive movement and their speaker Pres. Wilson...
Admittedly the flow of influence is unbroken all the way back to Grugg vs Ugg, but that's where I see the latest sharp departure/inflection.';

'>>61469699
What movie are they going on about?';

'>>61469593
Hitler was a black woman';

'>>61470239
Hamas-Red cell connection?
It's over.';

'>>61482428';

'>>61482441
>supremacist
Checks out';

'>>61470865
This but unironically, the fags kvetching eternally about CRT (wait, new buzzword dropped, we bitch about DEI now) are massive vaginas.';

'>>61482040
I think anon is uninformed about the protests, that they began to matter when veterans got involved. Seriously look at the impact those protests had and the adminstrations change when veterans were heading the protests

Fuck john kerry though.';

'No. the USSS's SRT is made up of mostly former operators.';

'>>61470468
No? Is she hiding behind the gorilla?';

'>>61470417
>seal team 6
That explains the loose bags of cocaine being found around the fucking place.';

'>>61470744
Some of the secret service codenames are fucking funny. They called JFK "Lancer" kek. Hillary being called "Evergreen" did not age too well either.
They came up with C letter names for the Bidens, wonder what they had in mind for Hunter.';

'>>61469706
Live action foryouposting';

'>>61469706
i enjoyed how when they landed they were prepared to just lay there and act like a victim, but having someone barrel down on them perked right up. Exposed a lot of psychology there.';

'>>61476174
the western forces took the rest of DC. they had "muh tanks and jets" everywhere.';

'>>61482465
>screeching cuckery
>no you're the pussies
>can't even say pussy
seeing these people reduced to this is not nearly as rewarding as I hoped but at least it is finally here';

'>>61469593
The real masterminds are in Tel Aviv. Not the white house.';

'>>61485265
>nooo actually my NPC programming is heckin' based and YOURS is gay
Get over it faggot, you're just the rightoid version of the faggot with blue hair.';

'>>61469593
this is the dumbest part of the movie, everyone knows the white house has a bunker underneath it. Why even send out a diversion suicide mission if you are just going to sit in the oval office';

'>>61479361
>We'll except in this palace of schizo's.
Nice try, ESL. Apostrophe usage is a total mystery to you.';

'>>61473136
Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus, theoretically the President has the right to suspend certain Constitutional rights in certain situations.';

'>>61469715
>and film makers are fucking lazy.
how is focusing on the story and the composition and managing hundreds of different people who all want to do different things lazy?';

'>>61469664
>are largely former special forces
Lol
None of the Secret Service guarding the President are competent, it's a borderline punishment assignment because of what you have to deal with. Everyone who is competent is assigned to dealing with counterfeiting, since that usually involves North Korea or China.';

'>>61488805
So did Obama, during the Boston marathon bombings.';

'>>61488805
That was inarguably unconstitutional (although necessary). If any President tried that today, the Supreme Court would shove a boot up his ass. Lincoln had a lot more leeway due to literally half the country taking up arms and the remaining US Congress having zero tolerance for it. American politics today are very different and far more divided, as hard as that is to believe. Even if some extremists on the left or right decided to rebel, that'd still leave moderates in the establishment subtly defending them.';

'>>61482281
The Vietnam protests accelerated everything that was happening in the '60s once the war died down and the draft stopped, things almost immediately slowed down';

'>>61469821
sappers like in total war games';

'>>61469706
Shame the twink didn't have a gun, fatso would've learnt';

'>>61481499
>IMO the next major war (think Vietnam not GWOT) is going to be a US invasion of Iran.
I don't see it. It'd be an Iraq II against a population twice as large who have reason to hate us for installing a puppet government and then dedicating ourselves to marginalizing and crippling them for having the audacity to overthrow it and govern themselves.
We don't have strong allies in the region. I think even Israel would push back at being used for years as rapesville for US servicemen. While they see Iran as a threat, the US attacking them doesn't really do anything but make that worse. Israel wins more by keeping up a drumbeat about the threat and asking for gibs to stand as the Guardians of the Middle East: "It's us vs them, and we're your 'us'."

The next war is going to be China because they're not going to forever put up with the US running half its fleet up and down their coast, sending daily patrol planes over their artificial islands, and sending nuclear armed bombers over as threats to, "stay contained to within 13 miles of your shores as we operate 10,000 miles from ours... or else."
China is going to break the chains we have wrapped around them, we're going to try to chain them again, they're not going to comply, and we're going to count that as "belligerence" warranting ever-escalating aggressive affronts until China gets fed up with it and does something like start FODding our patrol planes with chaff or declaring them to have violated their airspace and forcing them to land, which we will see as casus belli for sending in the carriers to start bombing them to "stop their aggression."';

'>>61469593
this shit was pretty kino, and I'm tired of pretending it's not.';