'I have 2-3x33 Leupold on my 1022. Its ok. Plain crosshair, pretty light and compact, nothing fancy. Works for shooting groups too at 50 m.';

'>>61569768
is that a carbon fiber barrel?';

'>>61569833
hammer forged match bull barrel';

'>>61569768
I mean 2-7x33 of course';

'>>61569897
was it an aftermarket barrel? I want to get a "match" 10/22 but here in europe it's difficult to source custom barrels.';

'How good are these? I really want to get a 22lr revolver.';

'>>61570009
its actually not aftermarket but Brownells web store sells 1022 aftermarket parts including barrels. Theyre expensive with the many taxes but theyre there';

'Is there a more comfy gun than an old 22? I think not.';

'>>61569897
>10/22
>hammer forged match bull barrel
I fell for the "bull barrel" meme.
Don't.
> heavy as fuck
> not really sure if more accurate
> heavy
> only nice part is the suppressor is same diameter so it looks nice
> but 16.1" of 0.92" barrel is just needlessly heavy';

'>>61570810
it is accurate though probably not because of the thickness. that mass and how forward it is helps a lot when I shoot offhand. I think its pretty optimized for rimfire team matches where we have 3 man teams(1 rifle 2 pistols) and plates at 25, 50, 75 and 100 meters';

'Hawke has designated rimfire scopes

https://us.hawkeoptics.com/rimfire-riflescopes.html';

'>>61570035
Get a Ruger Wrangler';

'>>61570035
What are you looking for in a 22 revolver? What price range? Single action or double action?
Lucky for you, there are a shitload of nice 22 revolvers out there.
>>61571005
You need to get some new grips on that. The factory grips just feel so cheap. I immediately replaced mine with some wood grips.';

'>>61570982
damn, those scopes seem to come with a great variety of accessories that aren't a billion dollars like with leupold
i'll think about getting that instead';

'>>61571005
>>61571048
>>61571048
>What are you looking for in a 22 revolver?
Mostly somewhat high capacity, double action and durable so that it will last years. I wanted it to be a revolver so that I could also load 22 shorts for quiet plinking';

'>>61571074
Well, the ruger 101 will likely never wear out. Those things were made to last forever. The only issue on that one is weight and price. They are really heavy, i can attest as I carry a 357 sp101. I paid 500 for mine, but they seem to cost upwards of 900 depending on what scumbag is selling it. I still recommend the ruger though.
An alternative would be the hi standard sentinel or double nine. The sentinel looks vaguely similar to a colt new army and the double nine looks like a single action army, but it is double action with a swing out cylinder.
They are retro, but they still hold up today. They can be had for 200 ish and they have been around for a long time. The fact that they have been beat to shit for 50 years and still work is a good sign.
I have one of each and they are pretty neat.';

'should I get a 10/22 takedown or one of those Archangel Quick Breakdown Stocks and a regular 10/22?';

'>>61570009
how well does a .22lr shoot with a holosight?';

'>>61569755
>best cheap
how cheap we talking?';

'>>61573736
unless you gotta better choice than >>61570982, there ain't much else
i think i'm gonna go with hawke, since they got things like scope covers & other accessories';

'>>61573764
I got a vortex diamondback tactical 4-16x44 and it's pretty good, parallax adjustable, good enough clarity and reticle. I got mine for 350 from a store. I liked it more than the rifle I had it one, which is why it isn't on anything at the moment.';

'what zoom scope should I get if I want to shoot around 100 yards?';

'>>61571005
Based wrangler poster';

'>>61573715
I tried it this past sunday and I liked it. I like that it got zero distortion compared to smaller red dots, but it's kinda top heavy for such a light rifle. I'll probably keep it on till I get a pimary arms 1x prism.';

'>>61572518
I have a takedown 10/22 and personally if I could go back I'd just buy a normal 10/22. I barely ever use the TD function.';

'bump';

'>>61571005
>>61571048
Speaking of .22 revolvers, whatever happened with the diamondback sidekick? Remember some hype for it before it was released then never heard anything about it.';

'bump';

'>>61577402
TD makes it super easy to clean though';

'>>61569755
Don't bother with see-thu rings, it's a bad meme.
Get cheap rings, vortex is fine.
I have a VX-freedom, it's pretty good, though don't rule out a 3-9, there's good reason why it's so popular.';

'>>61569755
Even the cheap Vortexes are pretty decent. Leupold has pretty good glass and built quality but their turrets are a very old, limited design. They tend to be feature barren at the low end but are really lightweight. Athlon also has a very good reputation of quality for money but I have no personal experience with them. SWFA's Super Sniper line is excellent optical quality for money, especially the fixed power models.

>>61573935
3x to 5x is plenty if you are shooting gongs or cans or rats or something. If you are shooting for groups from a bench, the most magnification you can possibly achieve without optical degradation is extremely beneficial, with no upper limit.';

'>>61584135
that stock is sexy as fuck';

'>local shop got an old Savage 64 in
>polymer stock has been rattlecanned camo
>$100
I don’t need another semi auto .22 and brand new 64s aren’t much more than $100 but damn if I’m not always tempted to buy every non total garbage gun for $100 that I see.';

'>>61581462
if you care about groups the zero shifts a little even when tightening it back down to the max.
>>61584176
>SWFA's
based. I used their 10x42 on a long range course and I loved it. they are tanks. I wish they were more easy to find in europe.';

'>>61570009
It looks like one of these. I saw one of these at an outdoor show and holy fuck are they pretty in the sunlight. Actually it was a custom built by Ruger too with a special S/N. I wish I bought it.
https://shopruger.com/10_22-Target-Barrel-Blued/productinfo/90550/';

'>>61572518
Why not get a folding stock instead? I like my B-TM but I know, $250 for a stock lol.

>>61573935
Probably 3-9x. What are you shooting and where/how would you be using it? If hunting squirrel I think you might want to bump zoom up a little but I've taken them out to 70yds. 100 is pushing it for my skills at the very least.

>>61584135
>get cheap rings
Do not get cheap rings; they have caused immense issues for me. Leupold rings are only like $30. Vortex would probably be okay but still. Also what gun is that shoved into the B-TM stock? That looks like a nice PCC.

>>61570009
>>61586068
Fuck, the gun had a custom S/N I'm retarded';

'>>61578683
It was released and just became another revolver in the mix. My LGS had one awhile ago and it sold pretty fast. They'll order one in for me if I want, which I'm considering. I always get a new revolver for myself for my birthday.';

'undefined';

'I have 3 big calibers, but no .22's. Should I get a 10/22?? I've been debating, but I live in Illinois and PICA won't let me buy anything more than 10 round mags. Another question is, if I get one, can I buy airsoft bipods and an airsoft optic on .22's? Or should I just buy regular firearms accessories.';

'>>61590288
If you think you'd like to shoot a semi auto .22 a lot heck yeah. I like bolt action myself.

Bipods, who cares, all it has to do is not break and chinese stuff is cheap. You can get Harris knockoffs for like $20 (non swiveling) or $40 (swiveling) that are finicky to mount but very solid, I have a few for my .22s, they're great. I think pivot locks/podlocks are very helpful too for the swiveling Harris design they're about $10 extra

Optics no don't buy toys, buy "real" optics, but you don't need to pay that much. There are lots of very respectable rimfire optics from $150-250, like OP is asking about';

'>>61590288
>I have 3 big calibers, but no .22's. Should I get a 10/22??
Yes, huge aftermarket.
>I've been debating, but I live in Illinois and PICA won't let me buy anything more than 10 round mags.
That sucks but the 15 and 25rd mags can be finicky anyways.
>Another question is, if I get one, can I buy airsoft bipods
Maybe? I mean they're cheap anyways and really a lot of chinky bipods are somewhere inbetween.
>and an airsoft optic on .22's? Or should I just buy regular firearms accessories.
Fuck no, still buy a decent scope. I've gotten to the point where a $300 Leupold is my go-to but I'm sure a $100 Bushnell from the nearest sporting goods store wouldn't be much worse. Else if you go cheaper (Barska $75 scopes) prepare for "why did my zero shift" the game which you can never quit, which only gets more fun when you hunt. And big groups which are unexplainable. And the "fuck my ring screws came loose again" game.';

'rim this bussy lmao';

'>>61586103
Oh by "cheap rings" I mean that price range, i don't mean like bottom barrel chinesium.
It's a Volquartsen summit, toggle lock .22lr.
The bolt handle was quite tall so it was sent off to be machined back a bit so that the stock could clear it.';

'>>61588586
not bad, kinda makes me respect those olympic 50m pistol shooters more when they show that they usually group all in the 10 or 9';

'heres your gun bro
>captcha: M NAH V';

'>>61594550
thanks bro';

'>>61594636
Holy fuck, that EOTech is like adding a fucking Beretta 21A on top of that thing. Massive.';

'>>61594550
>>61594636
Mace Windu gun';

'Is the Sako Quad a meme or actually worth getting for multi caliber use? I also just think they look cool.

>>61594550
>purple, black, and gold
>not purple, green, and gold
It's so over for us Piccolo bros.
I suppose you could just paint the lower recover green yourself though.';

'Lower receiver...';

'>>61594700
surprisingly comfy (not really)';

'is the Walther PPK/s .22lr good?';

'>>61595920
my little brother has one. the double action is a bastard, and it prefers mini-mags, but otherwise it's a good gun. I've got the P22 also and I like it as well, but it isn't as nice of a gun in terms of durability.';

'>>61594636
>>61595783
hey';

'>>61596055
sexy.
>ultradot
that's nuts';

'Bought me a H&K MP5 in .22lr to fuck around with. Its the pistol variant so it doesnt have the big ass fake suppressor. Anyone else got one of these? It was on sale for like $300 so I figured it would be a cool plinker.';

'>>61584135
What stock and what reciver? Was that receiver a 80% build or did you just straight up buy a complete custom one?';

'>>61595682
>make reasonably pretty blued .22
>make pretty nice laminate stock
>laser etch a huge massive fuck ugly billboard on the side that will more than likely age like milk or look awkward when customized by (you)
Can companies stop fucking doing this?';

'>>61595682
barrel swap works well but outside of places with limited number of guns/person why not just buy 2 rifles. Barrel is like 2/3 of the price anyway';

'>>61597126
Shut up';

'>>61570810
Bull barrels aren't more accurate, they're just heavier, which means less recoil and they heat up slower. Cold bore from a pencil and a bull is the same.';

'>>61596938
It's a friend's gun. Volquartsen Summit with a B-TM stock. Gun was complete with a more generic 10/22 stock and was just swapped out.
The summit is like a 10/22 pattern toggle lock manual action.';

'>>61597479
Is it possible to flute a bull barrel without fucking the accuracy?';

'>>61597932
absolutely';

'>>61571005
>Fumo
>Revolver
Hi MentisWave';

'>>61597377
not nearly as bad as what they did to the "premium" lmfao';

'>>61597932
One has nothing at all to do with the other.';

'>>61598006
>>61597938
Cool, just checking since I heard some fuddlore about barrel harmonics changing or some shit. Sick of how poorly weighted my 16" T-bolt is thanks to the bull barrel so considering either a barrel change or getting it fluted.';

'>>61597909
NTA. Is it manual always or optional semi? And is it sold as a stripped receiver or built as rifle only ? Might be an interesting pistol build; my state doesn't allow hunting with semi pistols because of unknown retarded reasons.';

'>>61597984
>chases ur checkering
>problem solved
Seriously though at least that can be removed. Why is it only .22s that get this treatment? They're still like $500.';

'>>61569755
Primaryarms or leupold fixed power';

'>>61597909
Neat, thanks. Sadly I can't afford anymore custom stocks right now because I wasted all my money on pic related.
Hopefully it isn't complete trash.';

'>>61599270
>Why is it only .22s that get this treatment?
GRIPZONE™';

'>>61598026
Bull barrels are just a fat rod with a rifled hole down the middle. No one is machining them down by .017" or some shit to get the perfect harmonics. Assuming barrel harmonics are actually important (they're generally not), you're not any less likely to get good harmonics from an arbitrary sized bull barrel with an arbitrary symmetrical fluting pattern than just the arbitrary sized bull on its own. It's all just random luck.';

'I just picked up a marlin century limited yesterday and was pretty excited about having another vintage 22 rifle. Got it for really cheap from the used section of a c*abelas. Heres the problem, it does not cycle. For some reason the carrier does not lower enough to catch the round coming out of the tube, making it completely unable to chamber a round. Upon disassembling it, and cleaning/lubing it I still cannot figure out what the issue is. While taken down it appears to cycle just fine, and anywhere where there is friction and contact it is lubed. There should be absolutely no reason that the carrier just decides that it cant make it down an eighth of an inch further. When researching the problem, it seems that its pretty rare as I cannot find anyone else talking about the issue. I am pretty pissed off that I was sold a paperweight. I am sure i can figure it out eventually, but still. I figure thats why I got it for less than half of what they go for at gun shows and for a third of what they go for online.';

'>>61586068
yeah its probably that one. I dont have a good photo in sunlight but it does look very cool';

'>>61569755
Whats the run down on lever actions? Been thinking of getting a .22lr rifle for some plinking and general target shooting on a budget, and New Vegas has made me want a lever gat again. Been thinking of maybe a bolt action too.
>inb4 10/22';

'>>61600336
Tighten every single screw that is anywhere near the feeding mechanism. Believe it or not that fixed this rifle and the previous owner left it in pieces probably because it didn't cycle lol. Somehow it backed out despite being staked. Tightened it down and like magic now these two things that kick up the next round are pretty much perfectly even with each other despite one of these guns being WAY more worn out than the other. IDK what the feed mechanism looks like on a lever action (never had one in .22) but you never know.';

'>>61601537
never heard anything bad about .22 lever guns or bolt actions
guess its pretty hard to fuck them up, lol';

'>>61571005
Didn’t know MentisWave posted on /k/';

'Is .22 Magnum even worth it? I know it’s pricier and better in a rifle but I really like the idea of owning a revolver chambered in one.';

'>>61604350
its good, its hung on for this long for that reason';

'>>61602764
Oh, believe me, I have.
Upon looking down the tube with a tiny light, i can see that the riser never goes low enough. It is not rubbing anything though. It is floating on a pivot point.
There is only one thing left to try and thats polishing up some stuff. I may have to buy a replacement carrier if I mess it up.';

'>>61604713
Make sure it isn't something simple like being able to shim a part that's been worn out before going around polishing parts making movement potentially even sloppier. Polishing moving parts may also end up erasing some hints to what wore out or broke by shining up wear surfaces that would otherwise show something wrong. If you can cycle it fine half disassembled, I'd be concerned that it might be whatever side plate or whatever goes on when re-assembled (or something attached to it).';

'Holy fuck I think this thing is the JR-15; it's actually being released. Look at the safety and rail; same design. $454.95 at Centerfire. Oddly not made by WEE1 Tactical, now it's being made by Mountain Billy Gun Lab as the GOAT-15. They even have a different website than WEE1 at mtnbilly.com instead of wee1tactical.com which leads to a 404. Oddly the JR-15 manual is still up at wee1tactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/JR-15_OM_W_V2.pdf. Wee1 was in Heber, UT while Mountain Billy Gun Lab is in Charleston, UT so I'm not sure if they sold the machines to make the guns or moved and rebranded.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kq2APwc_AHs';

'for reference';

'Is that a prototype or an old WEE1 I spot in MtnBilly's age verification background? Note the silver barrel that's unthreaded and how the markings have been shooped out on the magwell.';

'I'm thinking of getting a green Beretta U22 Neos 6" this weekend. Redpill me on them /k/';

'>>61605544
I kinda want one. But not being able to get one threaded or find a carbine kit kinda sucks.';

'>>61605394
>>61605399
So that's where they've been. Man what a joke the media is, idk why these guys rebranded like that. There have been guns marketed to kids that's nothing new, and obvious gun owners would have bought them in droves BECAUSE of the libtard bloggers losing their minds. That 16" barrel looks lonnnnggg lol

>>61605544
Well okay. The grip is horrendously uncomfortable for adults, it's extremely small in circumference and the grip angle is absolutely bonko. There is no room at the web of the hand to choke up with a thumbs high grip so get used to shooting it with an improper grip. The trigger is pretty heavy and can be very gritty without modification, but after it's good. It's pretty nice shooting but it has a unique (and to me annoying) CLANK sound due to the hollow slide/bolt clinking against the barrel every shot. Mag release is in an interestingly unique but awkward position. Disassembly is easy but takes a time to wind the knob 1/8th of a turn at a time out while also holding the knob lock button.

BUT those green ones are pretty dang rare and that makes it an extra cool version of a cool gun. Even though I hate mine.

>>61605851
You can have the barrel extended and threaded by the likes of Tornado Technologies but it won't look as clean as factory. Also carbine kits are rare but stocks show up on gunbroker pretty frequently from some guy in PA that has like 100 of them for some reason.';

'>>61606343
I should really bug them to bring it back in an email. Idunno how hot braced pistol sales are right now but I feel it'd sell so much better right now than when it came out. Also consider the following...';

'>>61606541
>>61606343
The Neos was my favorite plinker as a kid. I always wanted the carbine kit, but was never able to get one.';

'>>61606343
>The grip is horrendously uncomfortable for adults, it's extremely small
When it came out here in italy in national ranges they had beretta posters advertising it for young teens';

'is $260 a good price for a 10/22 new? also wat do you think of the models with no iron sights but a rail receiver';

'Got all the rifles out the other day';

'Are any of these two a good deal? I always wanted a single shot 22.';

'>>61607123
Which model? Seems about what a wood stocked carbine should go for ($250+ ship) or a little above the plastic stocked carbine $230+ ship).
https://gun.deals/search/apachesolr_search/736676011032
https://gun.deals/search/apachesolr_search/736676011513
>also wat do you think of the models with no iron sights but a rail receiver
I think the aftermarket (non-Ruger) receivers with built in rails tend to look retarded but the Ruger ones that come with a rail will be removable and look way better. Pic related no doubt has a removable rail and probably something covering the rear sight slot or dovetailed into the slot. Also just me but especially with no irons it might as well have a threaded barrel since threaded no sights is way more common than threaded with irons in Ruger's catalog.';

'>>61608141
What's the one between the Remington pump and the Winchester?';

'B';

'>have old H&R 999
>1950s production, belonged to a family friend since the 1970s
>when I was a kid we used to go to his property to camp and we’d walk though fields and shoot grasshoppers out of the air with .22 ratshot with this H&R
>he gave it to me maybe 10 years ago
>he’s battling lung cancer now, sucks cuz he’s still close with my parents and is a really cool guy
>it’s a well used gun, lots of love and use
>SA trigger is fine but it’s beginning to have trouble in DA
>they’re notoriously hard to work on and few gunsmiths want to bother with them
>want to buy another .22lr revolver to replace it with
>really wanting some flavor of K/L frame S&W, maybe an SP101 but I’ll definitely miss the top break of the H&R
>not gonna get rid of it but just retire it
o7 little H&R you’ve been a great innawoods companion';

'>>61609153
From left to right

Rem 241, Win 62, Win 61, Win 74, Win 190, Mar 80, Mar 25, Mar 39a, CZ 457, Rug 10/22';

'>>61605544
didn't they discontinue it?';

'>>61611058
yes, back in 2019';

'>>61608141
sell me that browning sa22';

'>>61609008
i would get them all but im a shitty old gun hoarder. at those prices why are you even wasting time posting here? that shit is high quality made in 1960s 90% white america top tier manufacturing era. single shots are fun as fuck and you can bring them for teaching new people or your future sons. tube fed bolt guns are equally fun especially with a mag stacked with like 25 rds of shorts';

'>>61609142
this one is the railed version i was looking at
https://www.sportsmans.com/shooting-gear-gun-supplies/rifles/ruger-1022-carbine-blackcharcoal-semi-automatic-rifle-22-long-rifle-185in/p/1538006

the version with iron sights is $40 more
https://www.sportsmans.com/shooting-gear-gun-supplies/rifles/ruger-1022-carbine-satin-blackhardwood-semi-automatic-rifle-22-long-rifle-185in/p/301829';

'>>61610986
literally just buy a new hammer or trigger for it. one of those pieces is worn';

'>>61611864
I will gladly sell you my sa22 (note: I do not yet own a sa22, that is a Remington). Funnily enough, my LGS recently had a Belgian sa22 come through used. I was thinking heavily on it, but let it pass.';

'>>61611957
For the little bit more I'd go with the wood stock. They're way more solid than the hollow plastic stocks; I ordered a plastic stocked carbine fully intending to replace the stock ASAP and it wasn't really a nice stock at all IIRC, though light. Also yes that rail is removable which leaves you options which is a good thing. Having iron sights on it also leaves you more options than not having them in the first place and neither are threaded barrel models.';

'>>61613548
threaded barrel doesnt matter for me because im cucked by commie laws';

'>>61615288
That sucks. In that case then yeah don't worry about it and go with the wood stock to get irons and a more quality stock.';

'>>61615738
thanks. i guess with all taxes and cucked fees im going to be into it at about $375 which kind of sucks but i guess thats the best i can do here';

'>>61616144
That's about what I paid for a (crap) plastic stocked carbine with threaded barrel last Fall. Actually about down to the dollar amount, $340 for the gun and probably around $370-80 by the time it was transferred and shipped. Could be worse. I wouldn't say don't get the plastic stock but I haven't heard flattering things about the stocks when I was researching "accurizing" a 10/22. Not stiff at all, uneven gaps, you name it.';

'>>61616264
thanks man. i really wanted the takedown but cant afford it because its almost double the price and would rather just have something now asap before theres a panic buying spree and shit disappears soon';

'page 10 bump';

'>>61616622
Honestly run subsonics and you're a surprising amount of the way towards silenced in a 10/22. Sounds oddly similar to when I run supersonic through mine silenced but without the crack, though likely a hair louder. Also I was thinking about the TD as well but a folding stock like the B-TM (if you can put on on a 10/22 in your state, IDK) does most of what the TD does without worry of zero shift due to taking the barrel off and putting it back on (when using a scope, red dot, etc. attached to the receiver) as well as being able to fold it whenever, say, during hunting. Doesn't get you super short but without a silencer or threaded barrel especially, it's enough.';

'bump';

'pump';

'also holy fuck muh dik
>$16.1k
https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/71/1056/rare-special-order-winchester-model-1890-rifle-with-scope';

'>winder musket sold on Sunday for 1.6k+

Fucking winchester fags

>NIB nickel Whitney Wolverine 6k+

Should have to pay Ian for making anyone give a damn about muh plastic raygun.';

'I just think these are cool. Are 10/22s the same price and better in every way? Yes. But I still want one for fun.';

'>>61590350

Never looked into bolt .22's except CZ 457, what else is there? Anything within stock 10/22 price range?';

'>>61627086
The ruger american rimfire at around the same price as a 10/22. Otherwise there are plenty of forgotten old .22s rotting away in pawn shops across the states. Not impossible to find a rusted over bolt action from the 60s for $100. A little TLC can make them good again.';

'>>61611878
Is this bad sights or worn barrel?';

'I just got my first can, and I'm now looking for a dedicated 22 host for it. I do have an AR with the cmmg bolt in it but it's not ideal.
Is there anything better than a 10/22 for my purposes of plinking and shooting trash quietly?
Open to suggestions, I like those rimfire mp5s but I hear they are a dog shit umarex product.';

'>>61628696

NTA but the word choice "it shot" as opposed to "it grouped" is weird. If it grouped but a foot to the left it's probably just the sights. Since the previous owner thinks it's the sights, good chance it is, but 1ft off means you may need to take it to a gunsmith and install an entirely new sight, it might have been a combination of ammo and sights. If he remembers, ask him if it grouped well or not.';

'>>61628696
Probably the sights are misaligned. The first .22 I ever had the sights were like .22" off from center and the groups were shit lol. Fix the sights with a brass punch and a hammer on a wood bench to push them back (or with a proper sight pushing tool) and wow, it groups. My first semi auto handgun had the same thing. Both were used. Fucking rear sight alignment. Don't do adjustment on a hard surface or you'll put marks in the barrel; use a wood workbench or something. And use a brass punch, not steel. Also remove the gun from the stock before adjusting unless you want to severely fuck up a stock worth more than the gun.';

'>>61628696
Something like this. Google images pic for example. Take a 1/4" punch, maybe a little bigger, and put its face near the base of the sight channel to push it back to center. Don't use a massive hammer for the punch, but a regular claw hammer will work, just go gentle.';