'>>61578271
Its probably better than this piece of trash';

'>>61578276
Not like Italy is ever going to use them anyway';

'>>61578271
Yes, it could only hit a target 4km away.';

'>>61578271
>just hide in the bush bruh.';

'>>61578311
BE the bush.';

'>>61578271
Depends, what is the features you and your doctrine desire in an MBT?';

'>>61578311
kit';

'>>61578315
>>61578311
Why are we posting bushes I don't get it';

'>>61578325
The first one is clearly a cat. Get your eyes checked.';

'>>61578271
It has movable suspension';

'>>61578271
France went from making cheap tanks but effective tanks to a stupidly expensive Merveille Baguette Tank impossible to export...';

'>>61579022
France stopped being a tank military.
Why are you mentioning France?';

'>>61578991
...all suspension is movable, anon. Its one of the main working principles';

'>>61579036
France left a huge hole in the MIC with their Leclerc-misdirection essentially killing 40 years of partnership as clients with a lot of countries. All these L2/L1 licensed variants makes it more evident.';

'>>61578271
Who the fuck ever claimed that they are bad?';

'>>61579436
Probably another germuttistani thread,';

'>>61578271
nah';

'>>61578271
probably
God forbid our government to make good decisions';

'>>61578325
there's clearly a person there blind retard';

'>>61578276
>tank is better than significantly older tank
woah no shit?
also shitriete looks better
it’s the best looking tank in the world after the Challenger';

'>>61578271
nobody has ever said these tanks are bad.
who told you that?';

'>>61579053
Ok it has movable suspension while parked in one spot';

'>>61578271
The only people who say they're bad are butthurt Germans.';

'>>61584814
You, sir, have appallingly shit taste.';

'>>61587531
strongly disagree
t. g*rman';

'>>61587593
Do you love K2?';

'>>61587619
I wouldn't say that I "love" it, but it's a good tank, yes.';

'>>61587591
nice tumor on tracks';

'>>61587682
The Chieftain was pretty good apart from it's awful L60 engine. Export models fixed that and had a pretty modern hunter killer optical system. The platform still exists underpinning the Challengers. Had it got a better engine earlier it probably would have continued the British tank export traditions. The Australians and Canadians were interested in a variant of it with the Continental AVDS engine. The Israelis had a trend of putting that engine into their British tanks like the Centurion. Had the Israeli Chieftain sale gone through, they'd probably have done that too. Instead the Israeli sale was cancelled so the Canadians and Australians couldn't piggyback off of that large order for their smaller orders. The hull mods ended up later becoming the Shir and later thr Challenger 1, but those had a Rolls Royce engine instead of an AVDS.';

'>>61587682
Ah yes, as opposed to your low-poly shitheaps.';

'>>61578271
No, its good';

'>>61578271
Considering the production rate - yes';

'>>61587531
Polish would never say something they bought and localized production is bad.';