'here are the other choices';

'>>16138213
>reasons Europeans are taller than Asians
how is this something on any burger's mind';

'>>16138316
hey hold up there buddy, not THAT science';

'>>16138329
lmao';

'>>16138211
Grandiose delusions is another topic thats off limits in science. Its not on the list, but nobody is allowed to investigate it';

'>>16138316
>evolution is true and god doesn't exist
but also
>evolution in humans doesn't happen above the neck

so if evolution in humans doesn't happen above the neck then everything above the neck in humans must've been created by god';

'>>16138316
>>16138329
these are same people that will beg you to be sad about satanic tranny books that were burned by nazis';

'>>16140139
I'd like to get to go to a book burning one day. Seems like a fun and a productive activity';

'>Sample size of 500
Why even bother?';

'>>16138223
It isn't. That's why it isn't taboo.';

'>>16138213
Everyone knows trannys are mentally ill, its not taboo to talk about it';

'>>16139745
>everything above the neck in humans must've been created by god
Is that true for all species or just humans? What do evolutionists have to say on this topic?';

'>>16139745';

'>>16139745
>>16145778
Atheists don't feel compelled to have rational and consistent worldviews, atheists have no fixed beliefs, they'll claim to believe one thing if thats what it takes to get what they want and then they'll claim the opposite belief in the next sentence if they perceive that to be to their advantage. They don't care about honesty either, their only care is about satisfying their immediate emotional ego needs.';

'>>16138211
Because HIPAA makes it illegal to show people race-labelled brain scans so they can see the differences for themselves';

'>>16146485
That describes humans generally. When religious people find inconsistencies in their dogma, they explain it away with "god works in mysterious ways". How else could they thank god when they win a football game, while forgetting all the children who die from leukemia.

I'm atheist and recognize there are genetic differences between ethnic groups. This results in shifted averages in various phenotypic traits like physical appearance, IQ, sprinting, susceptibility to disease, etc.

We should still try to uphold a fair system where people are judged on their own merits. DEI is corrupt and affirmative action quotas are dumb. Moreover, we should only have skilled immigration, such as high IQ Asians and Indians. There's even some Africans who do well in the West, like the Igbo of Nigeria.';

'>>16138211
Has this survey been carried out in person or via anonymous surveys on the internet. If it's on the internet, such surveys will suffer from sampling bias.
It already silently pressumes certain topics to be politicized and concordingly to have become tabooized. Why else ask questions such as "is IQ genetic and are there races?".

If you introduce such statements, knowing that a large number of people will act on that kind of dog whistling, you promote participation of those already critical to modern-day politics. These people are more likely to engage with these ideas in the first place and subsequently end up sharing such surveys whereas others wouldn't. Of course, that presumes that the survey has largely sampled its responds by distributing and sharing it.';

'>>16146907
>That describes humans generally.
projection
>I'm atheist
thats why you presume you can speak for the rest of humanity, because you're massively narcissistic and have zero self awareness, like all atheists';

'>>16144404
Just humans
>source
My mom taught me';

'>>16138211
How can I profit from this?';

'>>16148671
Use your newly found knowledge of how to stir up controversy to become a famous controversy instigator, then sell advertising.';

'>>16138211
That's not about the sciences. It's just American taboos generally. You can talk about whatever you want in the sciences as long as you can pass peer review and be willing to deal with any criticism.

Hell, that study itself is the sciences and necessarily discusses all that shit.';

'Another thread where foreign shills imply that their political views are being suppressed by "the man"';

'>>16149438
>blocks your path
retard';

'Remember, if your research contradicts the orthodoxy, your research is faulty and must be rejected. If it were good research, science would have approved of your findings and welcomed it. There is no taboo. There is no censorship. There is only faulty research, which we know is faulty because it doesn't agree with the science.';

'Interesting that the young are more caught up with things being taboo than older people.';

'>>16149463
He wasn't BTFO cause he violated a scientific taboo. He was BTFO because he said baseless racist bullshit in a documentary called "American Masters: Decoding Watson" about him. Science had fuck all to do with it.';

'>>16149476
>Hate speech isn't free speech
Do you have any clue how much of a clown you are?';

'>>16149476
you are a spergy retard that has no business in the sciences. It is darkies like you that have ruined science';

'>>16141605
Because increasing the sample size to *infinite population* increases certainty by less than 1%? Methodology is the only relevant factor here.';

'>>16149483
Do you have any idea how much of a clown you are?

I didn't say the dottering old racist didn't have a right to say what he did. I said he got deservedly got BTFO and it had fuck all to do with the field of science.

You have a right to shut the fuck up. I'd advise you to exercise it so you stop embarrassing yourself.

>>16149507
If you think the sciences have been ruined, you're welcome to leave them. I doubt you'll be missed and it might raise the quality of the field a degree or two.

And just cause you're used to being dominated by black men, doesn't mean you should assume all your betters are black.';

'>>16149528';

'>>16149529
Please don't post your fap material here. Nobody wants to see that shit.';

'>>16149528
>betters
LMAO';

'>>16149540
Yep. Betters. Don't you have a cock you could be cleaning?';

'>>16149540';

'I mean, incest isn't all that wrong anyway, as long as there's no rape involved.';

'>>16149540';

'>>16149263
Hiromoot does this';

'>>16150892
lol
its funny because its true';

'>>16138211
that bottom one - anti-rain discrimination.
when will humanity finally mature to the point that rainy days don't suffer this persecution?';

'>>16149476
>He wasn't BTFO cause he violated a scientific taboo.
He was cancelled for speculating that the cause of an observed phenomenon was related to his field.

>Science had fuck all to do with it.
So it's not a problem of methodology? Then we can conclude it was with talking about the subject at all.
Which is the definition of a taboo.';

'>>16149474
Except for the fact of human evolution, which is the only topic the old considered more taboo than the young.';

'>>16156071
All days are equal regardless the weather, anyone who disagrees is a judgmental bigot';

'>>16148046
>you're massively narcissistic and have zero self awareness, like all atheists
Thats common factor between all of them
They all believe there is no God because they believe they are god.
Ernest Jones, in 1913, was the first to construe extreme narcissism, which he called the "God-complex", as a character flaw. He described people with God-complex as being aloof, self-important, overconfident, auto-erotic, inaccessible, self-admiring, and exhibitionistic, with fantasies of omnipotence and omniscience. He observed that these people had a high need for uniqueness.';

'>>16156260
>He was cancelled for speculating that the cause of an observed phenomenon was related to his field.
spec·u·la·tion
/ˌspekyəˈlāSH(ə)n/
noun
1.
the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence.

So not science.

>So it's not a problem of methodology? Then we can conclude it was with talking about the subject at all.
>Which is the definition of a taboo.
Try again in English.';

'>>16138211
https://odysee.com/@Realfake_Newsource:9/6.20-003-014:5';

'>>16158539';

'>>16141605
>Sample size of only 299 million.
Fucking useless.';