'>>16142173
>Objective and guided by data
sounds like art to me';

'>>16142173
Is cat a dog?';

'>>16142173
100% art nowadays.';

'>>16142180
They used to be';

'>>16142173
define art';

'>>16142173
art is science';

'>>16142173
is art a science?';

'>>16142173
Science leaves very little room for creativity.';

'>>16142843
The first step of the method is literally to create a hypothesis, the next stop to create an experiment, then created data, then analyze the data you created from the experiment your created to test the hypothesis you created.';

'In the strictest sense, no, but it can be artistically presented or used to produce art. Also, how humans produce and process art can be studied as a science although individual works of art would not be the science there. Likewise art can be used in science, but in that context, its artistic character is simply an unavoidable byproduct of human expression and not a desirous or fundamental component.

Science is built on systematic reproducibility which is fundamentally antithetical to art.

About the closest you get to science being an art is cooking wherein depending on the motive of the person preparing the food it can either be an artistic science or a scientific art.

On a completely unrelated note, Dadaism isn't art either.';

'>>16143354
Science is discovered, not created.';

'>>16143386
Discovery is just the creation of a novel observation.';

'>>16142838
In a way, yes.
People will say is no objectivity in art, but those people are retarded';

'>Is science an art?
umm yes';

'It can be. But a lot of science is rote repetition and that part is unavoidable in experimentation. Designing experiments can be a sort of art, though.';

'>>16142181
third panel, top of camera';

'>>16142173
>is (thing) a (different thing)
no.';

'Are frogposters homosexual?';

'>>16144076
sus';