String fullTitle = 'RX100 VA';
int postNumber = 4296998;
String image = '1711042958043399.jpg';
String date = '03/21/24(Thu)13:42:38';
String comment = 'Toughts on this camera?
Found one for around 400$. Not sure if i should spend more to get Vi or Vii for the better zoom.
Also what differences are between V and VA models?
I would buy one to carry around everyday , videos in vacantion. How is the video quality?
Also what other cameras should i look for? Any Canon's worthy with same specs ...etc?';
'>>4296998
This is the last rx100. The vi and vii are shitty boomerzoom cameras with slower lenses so anyone that isn’t retarded should ignore them. I still don’t understand what manner of bathtub sake the Sony engineers were pickling their brains with when they decided to ruin the lineup, when the super zoom rx10 already exists.';
'>>4297005
so ill have to chose between V or VA.
are these 2 solid cameras? any differences between them?';
'>>4297005
>I still don’t understand what manner of bathtub sake the Sony engineers were pickling their brains with when they decided to ruin the lineup, when the super zoom rx10 already exists.
It's for retards who see people praising the rx100 and would get it but are having second thoughts because, being retarded, they think more zoom = more better and 3x just ain't gonna cut it. You may have noticed that the VA is still being sold new.';
'>>4297052
>. The ' VA' model gains a deeper buffer, new white balance, metering and autofocus options, and the ability to save 720p proxy footage along with 4K video. Support for Sony's PlayMemories Apps has been removed.
ur welcome 4 googling 4 u';
'I'm looking to get one of these but VA+ is way too expensive, and I keep getting outbid on the V
Is the IV or even III worth it for say around the 300-400$ mark? Or are they just dust collector pieces that arn't practical anymore?';
'>>4297163
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-RX100M4 Camera Software DSC-RX100M4 v1.30 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 33 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2018:12:01 22:17:06 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 125 Brightness 1.0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.20 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1280 Image Height 853 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
';
I own a Iv, I love the little thing and the images are nice. But if I had to be honest, if you’re just posting to Instagram or whatever the quality won’t be too different looking than any modern phone. But some of the video modes are cool, and it is better in low light than phones still I would say.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
'>>4297185
Damn, I'm intending to use it for close ups of product photos for my job and then while I have it, use it for cosplay photography.
The RX100 seemed like a great way to keep things light when I travel, but I suppose I should start looking at the mirror less cams then';
'>>4297065
so for a noob like me , what does that mean? is better cus....? explain in dumb words';
'>>4297221
nta, but it seems like a minor iteration. They are basically the same camera, I would just get whichever is cheapest. None of the changes are going to have a gigantic impact on the function. The files are going to look the same.
Typically Sony will release "A" versions of their cameras with minor tweaks some time after the initial release. I would assume that's what this is.';
'>>4297185
>it is better in low light than phones still I would say
Hmm. We visited friends across the ocean and had the opportunity to travel through cities. I had an RX100VA with me, a friend had a current iPhone. In low light, my photos were only better overall when I could take my time to take pictures, i.e. with a tripod or a series of pictures for averaging. Especially with quick shots, shooting freehand or in rain, the ease of use of cell phones make compact cameras appear less than ideal.';
'>>4297229
>putting an rx100 on a tripod
gtfo';
'>>4297163
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-RX100M4 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Elements 15.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 70 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5472 Image Height 3648 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 137 dpcm Vertical Resolution 137 dpcm Image Created 2018:10:23 01:17:20 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness 9.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 25.70 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 3240 Image Height 2160 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
';
The big upgrade with the V over the IV is the phase detect AF, other than that you get 24fps instead of 16fps If you're going to be shooting quickly moving subjects then it could be worth it. That said I have the IV and even with just 25 contrast detect points it's still decently quick and will track objects.
>>4297213
Go for the RX100. It's one of the few decent cameras that are actually literally pocketable without wearing a trenchcoat. To get the same versatility on a mirrorless body you're going to be looking at about double the weight just for the lens, probably the same for the body, and like 4 or 5 times the thickness. You may even need to go with multiple lenses, or extension tubes with a standard zoom. I think this photo may have been taken using an old Canon close up filter (magfilter attachment) but it doesn't make a huge difference, the RX100 will focus pretty close on its own.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
'>>4297242
I’ve done that and even used it with studio strobes before lol. What are you, against having fun and fucking around or something?';
'>>4297324
you just seem retarded, is all';
'>>4297229
Depends on whether you like phone stacking smears more than ISO noise. It's a matter of taste.
Normies view everything as wallet sized photos now so the smears are invisible but ISO noise is not. Yes, things do look waxy and cartoonish, but all zoomers have body image issues so they actually want that especially on skin.';
'Can you get good subject separation with this type of camera? Still kinda feels like a hipster cellphone camera';
'>>4297325
>doing fun things with your camera besides spray and pray snapshitting building corners makes you a retard
Modern /p/ user, everybody.';
'>>4297335
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-RX100M4 Camera Software DSC-RX100M4 v2.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 24 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2018:06:01 23:07:14 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 2500 Brightness -0.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 8.80 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 667 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
';
Can you get a shallow depth of field? Sure. Not a shallow as a larger sensored camera of course but shallower than with a phone, unless you want to fake it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
'>>4297229
>the ease of use of cell phones make compact cameras appear less than ideal.
Try turning the big dial on top until the green "AUTO" lines up with the white line next to the dial.';
'Ok guys i have a mark iii of the RX100.
Which one would you say is the best upgrade for video, it would be a great help to hear.';
'>>4301592
The IV gets you 4K, but if you're mostly or just doing video then take a look at the ZV1 cameras';
'>>4297367
That example doesn't say much, even phones can get a decently shallow dof at that distance.';
'>>4301635
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
';
But not as shallow, arguably not "decently shallow". That's just physics, phones don't have sensors as large and lenses as fast. Would this same photo taken on a phone also have the paw and background out of focus? Probably, but not to the same extent. Just like how an even larger sensored camera would have an even shallower depth of field.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
'>>4301636
I'm not claiming that phones are good, I'm just saying that it doesn't tell much to someone who's concerned about full / half body portraits.';
'>>4301637
Well he didn't ask about that specifically';
'I own a III and it's really cool to use, the screen on these suck ass
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-RX100M3 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 34 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2024:03:27 16:10:56 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 9.9 EV Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.48 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
';
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
'>>4297335
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-RX100M3 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 63 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2024:03:27 16:10:31 Exposure Time 1/1250 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 9.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 22.95 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
';
I don't think shallow DoF is something you should be seriously considering with any of these, at 1.8 or 70mm at f2.8 there's not much, some but not much
>>4297324
I so wish it had a hot shoe, that 1/2000 flash sync is so fucking cool to have
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
'>>4301592
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-RX100M3 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 16.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.5 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 31 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2024:03:27 16:11:03 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 9.9 EV Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 11.45 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
';
The III is hopeless for video, lol
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
'i miss my rx100m3 :[
I sold most of my digital cameras for drugs or music gear a while ago now. rx100 is what I missed the most.
Shame what has ahppened to the secondhand camera market, especially compacts';
'It will do 95% of everything you could ever want to do with a camera. Just get it.
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSC-RX100M5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 70 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2024:01:11 19:55:49 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Brightness 9.0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 25.70 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
';
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
'>>4301637
in portraits you have control over subject to background distance';
'just got gifted an rx100 II, been pretty neat
>>4297335
with like an rx100 III, you get slightly better than an aps-c camera + typical f3.5-f5.6 kit lens';
}