'There are better lightweight ones but for compactness sure.';

'>>4298924
as everything meme design you are paying extra for the brand';

'I bought one last autumn and have been borrowing my friends Ulanzi for about a year before that.

So they are absolutely a hassle to use (too heavy for 35 mm and too light for medium format) however for the traveling film photographer where you absolutely need to keep the camera steady it's kind of a necessity. Think hard on how much you really need one because I promise you you will leave it at home if you possibly can.

Still I ended up going with the peak design version since it is much more serviceable out in the field. The ulanzi is better in many ways including the head, but it's just not as compact and not as easy to clean, with lots of fiddly bits that are kind of cool when you get them but become a hassle once and water and dirt get in between em.

I would also occasionally borrow a friend's manfrotto that he uses for studio work. But that thing is just to cumbersome for hiking.

Anyway my advice is don't get a tripod unless you NEED one.';

'>>4298924
>best
>legs thinner than your pinky
its a over priced meme';

'>>4298978
>best
>lightweight compact tripod
Moron';

'>>4298979
they exist and arent meme tripods';

'>>4298924
Just get a camera with IBIS old man';

'I'm not a fan of it, I got one but I don't like the twisting to lock and unlock. Would really prefer a lever.';

'>>4299101
What would you recommend instead?';

'Flimsiest I'd ever consider going is this style. I'm sure the even smaller/lighter ones technically can be serviceable, it gets to a point where it's barely a tripod and you wonder why you bother to bring it at all.';

'>>4298979
here you go, 40mm/32mm legs, and weighs as much as the aluminum peak design';

'Benro Cyanbird deserves a mention.';

'>>4299183
jeez talk about overpaying, why didn't you order through their ali shopfront';

'>>4299208
you can't you retard, its not there. also its a lot more expensive through their US website.';

'>>4298924
I had a long think about this two years ago, my choice was the current manfrotto be free, in carbon';

'>>4299267
I get the side loop of my backpack between the legs, it's secure, easy to carry, and light enough to forget it once it's there';

'>>4299267
>>4299268
Do you use the manfrotto mount? All of my gear is for arca swiss and it would suck to have to get new stuff. Arca Swiss feels very solid I've never had a complaint about it.';

'>>4298924
If your tripod is light enough to hold with one hand, it's not heavy enough to keep your camera still outdoors';

'>>4299303
I'm using it but I don't love it, however I don't have another head/mount so it's a bit of a moot issue for me now

It works well enough, but I'm sure Arca Swiss is tighter';

'>>4299422
maybe youre just weak';

'I could never pay $600 for a tripod that doesn't come standard with arca-swiss, not to mention the last section of the Weak Design is so flimsy you might as well just not extend it. It seems like Weak Design is still keeping prices high to subsidize all the free/discounted tripods they gave to youtubers to shill their carbon fiber toothpick';

'>>4299524
The plate is arca compatible, if you remove the pins from the head then that will be too.';

'>>4299524
it is standard arca compatible';

'>>4299535
>>4299549
arca """compatible"""';

'>>4299607
Lmfao my $50 chinese “panorama head” fits arca plates perfectly whaddafuck';

'>>4299609
it looks like the quick release mechanism fucks up the angle on one side if the arca plate doesn't perfectly match the weak design plate size';

'So I'm near the beginning of my photography journey and I have finally realized I need a tripod so I can take better pictures of insects on flowers and on the ground. I loathe the idea of buying a tripod manufactured in China and would really prefer if it was made in the USA.

Is Colorado Tripod the best option? (picrel)

Also looking for info on geared vs monoball mount.';

'>>4299628
Based chink hater
If you want good workmanship just buy a Really Right Stuff tripod and cry once';

'>>4299628
Gitzo Explorer and an Arca p0 has been a great combo for me, gets low and points down very easy. Not cheap though, and you'll need to either find the tripod secondhand, or buy a chinese knockoff, as they no longer make it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

'>>4299628
Check out three legged thing for some options from UK, also very solid.';

'>>4299845
>Check out three legged thing for some options from UK
they're just chinkshit with tacky branding. from their own website:
>We design and engineer all of our products in the United Kingdom, and seek ways to innovate in order to create products that photographers love and want to use in their daily workflows.
Which is a classic way of saying, made in China.';

'>>4299662
Did I do it right?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

'>>4299662
>Really Right Stuff
I recommend checking out ProMediaGear. the RRS is owned by (((mormons)))';

'>>4299870
show me how laughably thin the last leg of the tripod is. use a pencil or pen for comparision';

'>Under main or sub tripod(<1.6m) > leofoto or whatever the fuck that grab your attention. just don't go under 200usd unless it's a mini tripod (like like leofoto MT-03)
>Main tripod > Gitzo

>sub ball head > Leofoto EB-36
>Main ball head > Makins or if you have more money Arca swess.';

'>>4298924
I like that brand but it's cringe as a French man because PD means FAGGOT in french so I wouldn't buy it';

'>>4298924
To you meme lord large format guys that may be in the thread, what sorta tripod setup you working with? I recently acquired a Fuji gx680 and while it’s only 6x8 mf, the bulk and size of the thing is more like a 4x5 camera. My current 3leggedthing tripod whimpered just at the sight of it. Picrel left most one if you’ve never seen one lol

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

'>>4301448
a systematic series 5 tripod, from anyone, from gitzo to leofoto. you can get LM-404CLs on ebay for $300, they have 40mm legs at the largest and go up to 84" tall. I have a LM-402C for use with a gimbal mounted 500 f/5.6 and am happy with it.';

'>>4301450
I wonder if a pan and tilt head like in that photo would be the way to go. A ball head seems too fiddly for this size of camera. I guess it’s just about getting thicker legs innit. My current tripod is good for travel but even my eos r and sigma 105/1.4 can wobble if the wind is strong enough. Fuckin unexpected extra costs eh';

'>>4301451
that or a geared head if you can afford an arca swiss cube';

'>>4301451
>>4301452
or something like, which i think leofoto also makes a knock off of
https://www.acratech.net/tripod-heads/long-lens-heads/long-lens-head/';

'>>4301453
>over 400 bucks
>no mention of payload or weight rating other than “a 600/4, promise!”
Kinda sus';

'>>4301463
acratech makes nice heads, I have their GP and it was even more. weight ratings are retarded and are highly dependent on having the load centered on the head isnt always possible. 600 f/4s are usually as big as they come unless they're talking about meme lenses like Sigma's 200-500 f/2.8. A 600 f/4G is 5kg which is more than your fuji.';

'>>4301463
>>4301467
also if you think $400 is expensive, the acra swiss c1 gp is over 2000 euros';

'>>4301468
After tax it’s over 3000 Trudeau coins. Thing looks like 100% metallic sex though, I want it. Watched some videos and it seems like the ultimate tripod head.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

'>>4298924
I got one on a black Friday special two years ago.

I honestly have little complaints about it aside from using really heavy setups (I use it for video too, camera + 70-200 + v-mount + monitor).

For photography though, it's nice. BUT, I think it's too short in max length, and it's annoying the way the head only lets you shoot vertical in one specific spot.';

'>>4301450
>50kg tripod
Oh yeah, now we're making gainz.';

'>>4298924
The PD is the most compact. The ulanzi one is close, pretty damn good and half the price';

'>>4299962
That’s one of the selling points of the tripod anon. It’s compact.';

'>>4301954
>selling points
you've never used a tripod if you dont understand why long pencil thin legs are a terrible idea.';

'>>4301724
>ulanzi one is close
which one?
The Zero Y?
The F38?

I have 300 bucks and would like to get a lightweight travel tripod.';

'>>4302042
Only the head is different
zero y is standard arca compatible clamp
f38 is their proprietary quick release
But a simple google search would have gotten you that answer you lazy motherfucker';

'What do you guys think about Benro tripod heads? Looking to get the IB1';

'>>4302015
You’re responding to my photo. You don’t own a travel tripod, or a studio stand, or anything nice in between.';

'Manfrotto Element Traveller (small) in carbon fibre was my choice. works well for my gripped a7iii and i can (sometimes) put my RZ67 on it';

'>>4302042
Zero y for sure. The f38 just uses their own mount for some stupid reason. Zeri y is Arca Swiss, weighs very little and is quite compact.';

'>>4302155
>travel tripod
I have a leofoto lm-402c

>studio stand
robus 5570

both have leveling bowls, acratech gp ball heads and benro geared head.

you still dont understand why the peak design is a joke of a tripod for people who dont know how tripods work';

'>>4302206
You have no idea what a studio stand even is, lol.';

'>>4302206
that's not a studio tripod lol

on the other hand what's the fixation on arca swiss compatible plates?
it's not like I can afford a 2000€ gear head anyways';

'>>4302261
>what's the fixation on arca swiss compatible plates?
That's a bit of a dumb question. Obviously it's nice to have stuff that is interchangeable, not having to swap out plates. Many types of plates come standard in arca fitment and often aren't available in anything else, like L brackets. Some lens collars even have the dovetails cut into them so you don't need to stick an additional plate on them.';

'How is the Smallrig AP-01? Anyone has it?';

'>>4302652
>flip locks with no hex adjustments
no';

'>>4302705
never had problems with them on any of my 3 cheap manfrottos';

'>>4302261
>on the other hand what's the fixation on arca swiss compatible plates?
Fucking everything uses them except $35 best buy tripods? That's like asking what's the obsession with 1/4 bolts';

'>>4302716
this being thread mostly about travel tripods
my manfrottos don't use them
and to be honest I've never understood the fixation either
small quick release plates are awesome';

'>>4302720
nobody gives a shity about your shitty manfrottos';

'>>4302726
dunno about that anon
the Made in Italy ones are pretty nice';

'>>4302728
>the Made in Italy ones are pretty nice
Did they stop making tripods in Italy?
I have a Mf 190GO Carbon tripod made back in 2016. Happy to own this.';

'>>4302731
not all of them were always made in Italy
only the mid to high end stuff was';

'>>4302261
It’s not a fixation it’s just industry standard';

'>>4301468
The Linhof equivalent is even more expensive.';

'>>4301471
I have it. It really is amazing, but not sure if it's €2000 amazing.';

'>>4299628
>no chinese manufacture
You're shit out of luck then';

'>>4302759
>You're shit out of luck then
not him but why? I only buy things made in Europe. Try to. But there are always options to buy stuff which America or not cursed Asia made (India and Chaina are cursed if you would ask), and it doesn't do my life harder.';

'>>4302966
Made in america is a meaningless label. 90% of stuff "made in america" has just had its final assembly done in america. Western labour is way too expensive for anything else';

'>>4303000
nice digits
but not how it works in Europe';

'>>4303000
>Made in america is a meaningless label. 90% of stuff "made in america" has just had its final assembly done in america. Western labour is way too expensive for anything else
This is the way how complex things made (this is also the reason why chinks want to grab Taiwan). The last country that tried to use parts made exclusively inside the border died in 1991 (thank God)';

'>>4298924
I have a 3 legged thing Corey and I really like it. It's like you take one of those cheap ass compact folding tripods you see all over Amazon...then make it actually nice. I don't see any reason to upgrade basically ever.';

'>>4303000
Bike industry is a good example of this. We can buy frames made in Asia exactly to our materials & processes specs without our own QC/QA people overseeing every step, finished, decaled and shipped directly to our shops for $35. Just that frames metal tubing, that very same tube set, costs us $300 to buy in this countrry, and we still have to build a frame out of it and finish it. We have a cottage industry of botique builders in the us that build a frame with the same level of quality that China puts into their frames, but when you have to pay for the american cost of living for even one employee in a sole proprietorship, like Chris Chance for instance, that Fat Chance frame retails for $3000+ by the time it makes it on to the market. The american economic system just cant compete against chinas, theres no way around it. As long as you want the owner class to make as much $ as possible, the costs of everything are maximized to that end and every otter country on earth becomes a better option to do business with.';

'>>4303000
Western labour is too expensive for the culture of cyclical upgrades, but if people could go back to putting up with the concept of not having every toy imaginable RIGHT NOW and having the best one RIGHT NOW it would be fine.

Like paying an extra $400 for a bicycle - how many fucking bicycles do you buy?

If anything cameras, bikes, etc should be more expensive.

>>4303080
China is part of the american economic system. Our government has been purposefully propping them up and ensuring they stay cheap. We allow their industrial and economic espionage specifically because of the arrangement you stated: it allows american businesses to buy incomplete assemblies for less than they can make them as long as china is worse to live in than the US.

Modern china would not even exist as the strong class divide, genocidal, dog roasting regime it is without us. In 2000, there was an outcry about clinton fully normalizing and extending most favored nation status with them and ever since then china has gotten away with all of the exact same things our overlords say we need to hate and refuse to trade with russia for.';

'>>4303080
The fat chance retails for $3000 because when you can buy incomplete assemblies from a third world country where 70% of the population lives like iron age peasants, the literacy standard is artificially low, and intra-national migration controls are needed to keep the cardboard cities looking nice, making your own thing becomes a premium/prestige thing like buying clothes but italian. It's not a $3000 frame because americans can not make bikes cheaper than that. It's a $3000 frame because chris chance is greedy and wants even more money, and if he only wanted some money, he would max out his profit margins by supporting china.

This is OUR system, not theirs. We invented it. We invented it before we even did trade with china, when importers systematically gutted and destroyed the entire western camera industry via trade agreements with japan, which was china-like at the time, but with less animal cruelty and more pedophilia (they weren't forced to cut it out until the most recent olympics)';

'Speaking of Manfrotto.
Thoughts on the befree travel tripods?
They sometimes popup on ebay for cheap.';

'q999h';

'Anyone else really like these cheap heads where turning the handle adjusts the tilt damping? Makes adjustments really quick. Just wish there was a slightly beefier model with another panaromic adjustment on top so it would be possible to also use it with l-brackets.';

'Basically if this thing had a pano arca plate on top then it would be perfect. just sucks that video oriented heads in general are incompatible with l-brackets without an additional plate for the 90 degree adjustment.';

'Hmm, I think I mostly found what I was looking for. Just wish it didn't have the horizon leveling shit so the whole thing could be a bit more compact, and having the whole thing being supported on one side instead of both sides like the Vanguard seems a bit less stable.';

'>>4302652
I have it. It's probably not as sturdy as some high dollar tripods but it works great for me. I use it with a sigma 150-600 and r6';

'gents, I'm looking for a gimbal head except that it MUST NOT be "arca-compatible".

so far I've found the manfrotto 393. anything else?';

'>>4303753
>MUST NOT be "arca-compatible".
why

>manfrotto 393.
it looks laughably bad';

'>>4303783
manfrotto shill is just baiting for replies. the 393 is basically a proprietary arca plate.';

'>>4303431
is it any good?
what's a nice aliexpress tripod?
preferably carbon one';

'>>4299183
it's also 1/4 the max height at best lol';

'>>4299267
Such a SHIT tripod desu
There are really worlds between this and a proper Gitzo (or even a run off the mill Leofoto)
But GODAMMIT it is a sexy design';

'>>4299628
>Is Colorado Tripod the best option? (picrel)
Sure, if it's ever going to ship lol
They've been out of stock for four years now';

'Smallrig AP-100 thoughts?';

'>>4304856
since no one replied I've bought one
it looks surprisingly good
hope the build quality is nice also but in order to figure that out I'll have to wait';

'>>4305507
It's not very suited for portrait work tho.
And the memeswiss mounting system is not very nice. I would rather have a quick mount solution.
Buying this for $239 MSRP would be retarded.
With a discount it's a nice looking tripod.';

'>>4305508
>Smallrig AP-100
I mean the head looks nice but the spider looks shit. And by shit I just mean the same as every other generic chinese tripod. Keep an allen handy because you'll be retightening the leg hinges until you die.
Get an L-bracket for your camera to shot portraits; this is the tru beauty of arca swiss.';

'>>4305584
>i'm a soiboi who doesnt know what thread locking compound is';

'>>4305508
>I would rather have a quick mount solution
How much quicker than lever-lock do you actually need, anon, this autistic anti-arca thing you’ve been bringing up all thread is really odd desu. Seriously, what is realistically practically (as in not getting into counting milliseconds or some shit) faster than something like picrel?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

'Noob here.
I have a cheap aluminum tripod with a three-way head. Am I retarded for not seeing the benefit of a ball head? I tried one in-store, seems way more fiddly than just twisting my wrist to unlock tilt, smoothly aiming at the composition, and then tightening down with another twist of the wrist.';

'>>4305639
Ball heads suck. Three-way is better. IMO.';

'>>4305584
I don't think that will happen but the correct hex key is inside the central leg as part of the bag hook

>get this bulky accessory for your travel tripod
no thanks
>>4305611
>here put this additional plate on your travel tripod increasing the weight and preventing it from fitting inside the bag
thanks for the input anon';

'>>4305639
Well if your head is fully locked down then you've got three knobs to twist, compared to one or two with a ball head';

'>>4305660
>here put this additional plate on your travel tripod
He's talking about the head that's already on the tripod. You twist that ring to lock the plate in place right? That's just as quick as flipping a lever, and as he said you don't need it to be any quicker.

>get this bulky accessory for your travel tripod
Do you actually know what an L bracket is? It attaches and stays on the camera. It does make the body a little wider but barely.';

'>>4305639
>>4305640
>>4305669
I like a good ball head with an adjustable ring. Turn the ring one way and it’s was able adjustable to move your camera where you want then turn the other way to lock. If you want to constantly adjust it you can turn the ring to a point in the middle and it will stay where you move it while not being too stiff to easily move. Best system out there IMO.';

'>>4303783
>why
I hate anything arca-swiss with a raging passion, simple as
>it looks laughably bad
how so? serious question, never had a gimbal before. is it the U-shaped frame?

>>4304076
>manfrotto shill is just baiting for replies
gas yourself, jew. I use velbon and slik supports
>the 393 is basically a proprietary arca plate
no the fuck it isn't. it uses manfrotto's Q5/500/501/503 or whatever it's really called, which has a 50mm wide plate that slides in one way only. arca uses a 38mm plate and can be installed a number of ways';

'>>4306042
>I hate anything arca-swiss with a raging passion, simple as
Take a good look, anons, this is the kind of autistic spergatron that you’re out here asking for critique and advice kek';

'>>4306042
>how so?
its a couple shitty pieces of stamped sheet metal and a bushing. it is laughably bad and over priced for what it is. it is the very definition of chinkshit. what the fuck are you even putting on a gimbal when you're poor enough that the manfrotto is even an option?

>I hate anything arca-swiss with a raging passion, simple as
so you're a sperg who doesnt like one dove tail profile and would rather use a different profile only one small irrelevant company uses?

>50mm wide plate
arca is fine for a 600 f/4 and full sized rifles, what the fuck are you mounting which this dovetail wouldnt work for.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

'>>4306042
>>4306085
and it doesnt even fold up

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

'>>4306085
>calls manfrotto "chinkshit"
>using leofoto
ngmi';

'>>4306093
the leofoto is the most innovative gimbal out there. the only other folding gimbal is from benro, and the leofoto is smaller and half a kilo lighter. also it costs more than 50% more than the chinkshit manfroto. the manfroto is so terribad that tightening the pan knob doesnt even stop it from rotating. just try reading the cope in their reviews. but keep on pretending that the manfrotto is better because its label says it is "Inspired by FERRARI"';

'>>4306097
>tightening the pan knob doesnt even stop it from rotating
not a problem
>pretending that the manfrotto is better
I don't care that it's "better" or "worse" than chinkshit leofoto or winberley or whatever. I care that it doesn't have a fucking "arca-compatible" mounting';

'>>4306114
>I care that it doesn't have a fucking "arca-compatible" mounting
And yet you haven't given a legitimate reason';

'>>4306118
Big Manfrotto must be trolling us, only explanation. Any other quick release system will work similar to arca so I really don’t understand what that regard is even looking for. Just screw the camera directly to the stud o guess';

'>>4306125
that or a boomer who thinks this 1970s era design is the peak of gimbal technology';

'Sirui or bust.';

'>>4305679
why would I want to put a huge ass L bracket on my OM-4Ti?
why would I want to make the smallest full featured film slr bigger?
makes no sense';

'>>4306527
>smallest full featured film SLR
Its not a minolta dynax 5 anon';

'>>4306562
the Pentax *ist is even smaller
127.0x87.0x60.5mm
vs
122.0x84.0x63.5mm
no idea if any of these are smaller with a lens included

but let me clarify
>why would I want to make the smallest sovl full featured manual film slr any bigger?';

'>>4306563
>"sovl"
>its just manual focus and rectangular
Maybe if you bought an arca compatible L bracket you would find that it's easy to put on the camera and take back off for tripod shooting';

'>>4306564
Maybe if you've ever used a proper Made In Italy Manfrotto quickmount tripod you would understand that having only one single landscape position is a bad tripod design and that having to twist a metal ring several times to unmount the "quick" release plate is annoying.

Other than that it's an ok tripod but buying it for the full MSRP would be retarded.
Too bad the Ulanzi isn't like 100€ cheaper. Would be a no-brainer.';

'>>4306565
are you retarded? you do realize levers for arca mounts exist?';

'>>4306567

>>4305611
>>4305660';

'>>4306569
thank you for confirming you're retarded';

'>>4298924
>>4298925
>>4298969
Which tripod height is the best for standard?';

'>>4306575
the higher the tripod
the more useless it is
act accordingly';

'>>4306575
those are all laughably short. center columns are terrible, two segment ones even more so. also lol at 5'7" being the male model height';

'>>4305584
the head looks like absolute shit
it doesn't even have a case for the ball';

'>>4306097
>the only other folding gimbal is from benro
RRS has a two-piece gimbal that is quickly diassembled and folds up much smaller
Fotopro has two Gimbals that can be tilted all the way down until they align with the tripod
The Leofoto solution doesn't really look better in comparison';

'>>4306575
>Smallrig tripods
Also nice manlet for scale';

'>>4306892
>it doesn't even have a case for the ball
?';

'>>4306895
The cylindrical metal frame that holds the ball and allows you to adjust tension to control its movement';

'>>4306898
but it does have that?
you adjust the tension with the lever with "smallrig" on it';

'>>4306899
It looks like the frame is way too flimsy to hold such a large ball
There's a reason every proper brand uses a twist knob (or at least offers them alongside levers)
Stability is largely a function of ball head height and ball diameter to case diameter ratio
Half of the smallrig ball sits outside whatever little case this ball head has';

'>>4306901
can't say how it will hold up with time
but without the center column at max extension it's pretty solid
the bonus is that there aren't any knobs protruding away from the tripod (which is what most brands do and what I dislike on a travel tripod)';

'>>4306903
>the bonus is that there aren't any knobs protruding away from the tripod (which is what most brands do and what I dislike on a travel tripod)
Ah well, you do you
If you ever get the chance to at a store, though, just ask them if you can hold and try one of their proper tripods for 5 min
You'll feel the difference';

'>>4306893
>RRS has a two-piece gimbal that is quickly diassembled and folds up much smaller
it isnt smaller and it weighs almost twice as much, 0.85 vs 1.46kg

> Fotopro has two Gimbals
again, 1.3kg. try actually looking at the specs next time

>>4306901
>Half of the smallrig ball sits outside whatever little case this ball head has
most of the case doesnt act as a bearing surface so it doesnt necessarily matter';

'>>4306906
>most of the case doesnt act as a bearing surface so it doesnt necessarily matter
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2013/04/how-a-ballhead-works/';

'>>4306905
as I've stated multiple times when on discount it's probably a nice travel tripod all things considered
remember I've bought it for around 120€ cheaper than the F38 Ulanzi (comparing this tripod bought inside the EU with 2 year warranty vs Ulanzi shipped from China)
especially if you wanna avoid any knobs protruding away from it or having to rotate the legs 180° from the storage position or any strange colours and so on

are the more expensive tripods nicer? yes
would I spend twice as much on a travel tripod? no

So far I've only shot a single day with the tripod. With the 300mm f/4.5 and the OM-4Ti mounted. It was an ok experience even in a very windy (up to 40m/s gusts of wind) weather.';

'>>4298924
I have one, also bought ulanzi one. The PD is still new in box, been like this for months.

The PD cost was far more than ulanzi for the price. Though PD do have a quicker extending ability than ulanzi and also the build will be better. Messed up some photos from Norway as the cameras weight pulled down on the QD plate during a long exposure. Have now thread-locked the plate into the tripod thread to help stop this. The lock mechanism and the tilt system on the PD is so-so. Needs to be re-designed imo.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

'>>4306916
>the knobs stick out too much
> you have to spend half a second to rotate the legs upright
>the ball cup is picometers too small
>yap yap yap
What an autistic set of complaints I s2g, this websight never ceases to amaze.';

'Anybody here use one of these chink arca cube knockoffs? I’m thinking of getting one but even 300 still seems a bit steep.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

'>>4307139';

'>>4307194
Yes that was in fact the reaction the autismo turbo sped in this thread made me have, I see you understand as well';

'>>4307167
leofoto is a decent chink brand, i wouldn't hesitate';

'>>4307167
that isnt an arca cube knock off. the cubes as their name implies are cubes. that is one of arca's lesser geared heads';

'New kino just dropped. Did you ever want to use your tripod as... HIKING STICKS?';

'>>4307673
Anon monopods are nothing new don’t fall for chinkoid marketing nonsense';